Should Your Credit Report Cost You a Job?

A new bill would prohibit employers from using credit reports in hiring decisions

By Liz Wolgemuth

Posted: July 29, 2009

This sounds like a cycle of pure misery: First, you get laid off. Then, you're one of the 4.4 million Americans who in June saw their job searches stretch out six months or more. The bills keep rolling in—car payment, house payment, medical bills—and your credit card balance is ballooning. You interview for a job and you're one of the top candidates, but a late-stage credit check has the employer going with another hire. The bottom line: You need a job to improve your financial situation, but your finances are now hurting your ability to get a job.

[Search for your best city to find a job.]

A House bill introduced earlier this month aims to prevent such a situation. The Equal Employment for All Act would prohibit employers from using the details of a consumer credit report in making hiring decisions, with exceptions for financial firms and government agencies, as well as jobs requiring certain security clearances. The legislation follows efforts by some states to sharply limit employers' ability to consider a person's creditworthiness in hiring.

While credit checks historically were used to screen applicants for financial and government jobs, the practice has spread. More than 40 percent of employers run credit checks on job candidates, according to some research. Rep. Steve Cohen, who introduced the bill, points to a report that a third of workers making less than $45,000 a year have poor credit scores linked to bankruptcies, loan delinquencies, divorce, medical problems, or unemployment. The bill would give "some of our most vulnerable, 'credit challenged' citizens—students, recent college graduates, low-income families, senior citizens, and minorities—the opportunity to begin rebuilding their credit history by obtaining a job," Cohen says.

[See 10 cities with the most job postings per capita.]

Most employers who run credit checks do not receive details like account numbers—and they do not see the individual's credit score. They also tend to look for specific red flags—for example, trouble paying maxed-out department store credit cards, as opposed to late payments on medical bills, says Matthew Levine, vice president of Checkpast, a Dallas-based pre-employment screening firm.

There are existing safeguards on the credit screening process. The Fair Credit Reporting Act—which the new bill would modify—requires employers to notify candidates that a credit check may be involved in the hiring process, and candidates must authorize the credit checks. It also requires employers who, based on the report, would refuse a new hire (or, say, deny a promotion) to give workers a copy of the credit report and notify them of the company's plans. Individuals then may dispute the accuracy of the information in the report, as many credit reports contain errors.

Critics of the new legislation argue that, because of its limited exemptions, it would prohibit employers in nonfinancial firms from checking out the credit history of employees who would be performing a financial function—a manager of a retail store, for example, or a call center employee who handles credit card numbers. Smaller businesses tend to be especially vulnerable to employee fraud—as many as a third of business bankruptcies are because of employee theft, according to one study.

The idea that some companies would run a credit check because they see a candidate's ability to organize personal finances as an indicator of aptitude in handling the company's seems to cause the most agitation among the bill's supporters. "We just think that how you handle credit is not something from which you can necessarily deduce how you'll be on the job, and it's an unfair reason to tell a person they can't have a job," says Linda Sherry, director of national priorities at Consumer Action, a nonprofit advocacy group. In a recession, as many lose "the income to protect themselves," paying bills can become a challenge even for responsible consumers, Sherry says.

[See more on exhausting unemployment benefits.]

Some in the employment screening industry actually agree with Sherry on this point. The argument that "if you can't handle your own finances, how can you handle ours?" is countered by the fact that "people's personal lives can easily take a wrong turn for reasons not of their making—it doesn't mean they can't handle employers' books," says Les Rosen, president of Employment Screening Resources, a provider of background and screening checks. And Rosen says he believes hiring managers themselves are increasingly sensitive to the limited value of credit checks and generally target checks to candidates for positions that involve access to cash.

This makes me furious!

My husband was a retail manager for 8 years. He resigned from his position to pursue a dream of opening his own restaurant in June 08. Right from the start he was doing well, but around October business started to decline and bills were paid late. There were MANY layoffs in our area as well as business closings. In November of 2008 he decided to start looking for a job in retail management and still try to keep the restaurant going. He applied for a job - they were very excited about him - ran the credit report and decided not to offer him the job. We were crushed. At that point we were a month late with the house and vehicle. He applied for a few more positions in the same field - same thing. It is a vicious cycle. He closed his restaurant in Dec 08 and in Feb was able to find a job in the restaurant field, in another state - not what we want but at least he is bringing in some sort of income. I miss him and want him home. He is more than qualified for ALL of the positions he has applied for the credit report has kept him from the "job offer". I hope this bill passes because I want my husband back home.

GF of OH @ Nov 20, 2009 20:59:34 PM

A STORE MANAGER WITH POOR CREDIT?!!!

That is so obscene that low income people would EVER be under this level of scrutiny, while the wealthy with good credit are seen as WHAT? MORAL?

Please, with so many of THEM under indictment for FRAUDS of various sorts, WHY WOULD WE EVER ENTRUST THAT SOME WEALTHY PERSON DIDN'T GET THAT WAY BY ROBBING OTHERS BLIND, with a pencil, never a gun, of course.

We also have are business world with such integrity, WHINING about legislation that would prohibit goods MADE BY SLAVE LABOR from being bought here.

NO ONE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO A CREDIT CHECK AS A BASIS FOR A JOB HIRE.

Obviously many people with poor credit, ARE HONEST DECENT PEOPLE, if they weren't they'd go rob some of the money stolen by bankers, from taxpayers and improve their credit scores with it.

Let me give you but ONE example. I have BOA account, my child's support payments are collected from the other parent, through the state department of revenue. FOR TWO WEEKS, the checks came in lesser amounts than what is to be paid, and then FOR OVER A WEEK, no check came at all. Meanwhile, being of limited means, I have items hit the account expecting the issue would be resolved. One is an autopay to the Department of Education. BOA pays those THREE items, for a total of , get this: $52.00. They pay it because I've had the account for OVER TEN YEARS, when it used to be other banks, that BOA took over. NOW I learn the 140.00 child support payment is ON ITS WAY, it will hit the account...TOMMORROW. BY THEN THE BOA WILL HAVE COLLECTED 105.00 in overdraft fees, and the $52.00 paid. MEANWHILE THE ACCOUNT STAYS OVERDRAFTED (BECAUSE OF THEIR LEGALIZED LOAN SHARKING) and they now inform me of their NEW FEE, of $35.00 if the account STAYS OVERDRAWN FOR OVER FIVE DAYS.

HELLO, THE MOST IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, SUBHUMANS, ARE NOT THE FOLKS WITH BAD CREDIT SCORES, AND THIS IS HOW THEY KEEP THEIRS: LEGALIZeD LOAN SHARKING

Cindy of MA @ Nov 17, 2009 10:39:04 AM

Poverty as a Moral Failure

In America a poverty is considered a moral failure, so a person's worth, as a human being, is based on his or her assets. This is not only unfair, it is immoral. Still it makes perfect sense to the money-mongers who have duped a substantial portion of the citizenry into agreeing with it, for it will ensure that they will continue borrowing money and paying high interest on these loans to avoid being branded a moral failure. When are we, the working class, going to fight back?

Alexander of AZ @ Nov 15, 2009 19:00:58 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Places to Find a Tech Job

IT service jobs—in engineering and in software services—have fared well in this economy.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!