Overrated Career: Medical Scientist

By Marty Nemko

Posted: December 11, 2008

The Appeal: It's exciting to think you'll have a life of problem-solving and fascinating experiments that will help humankind live longer and healthier. Then there's the prestige: It feels good to tell people you're a medical scientist.

The Reality: You may have a better chance of winning the lottery than of making a significant medical discovery. First, you must have superlative undergraduate science and math grades and GRE scores to get into a first-tier science Ph.D. program, plus the ability and perseverance to complete it and, usually, a postdoctoral fellowship. Even if you do all that, the odds of landing a good research job are modest. Even more discouraging, only a small percentage of medical researchers make even one significant discovery in their entire lifetime.

Then there's the quality of life. Typically, you spend most of your 60-to-70-hour workweek alone in a lab or at your desk, with little people contact. And the pay? According to MIT faculty member Philip Greenspun, "Adjusted for IQ, quantitative skills, and working hours, jobs in science are the lowest paid in the United States.... [You spend] 10 years banging your head against an equation-filled blackboard in hopes of landing a $35,000/year post-doc job," with the prospect, in a couple of years, of getting that rare $70,000-a-year job as a tenure-track professor or a somewhat-less-rare position at a pharmaceutical company.

An Alternative: Medical librarian. Most people choose to become medical researchers because they enjoy solving science puzzles that could lead to medical discoveries. Your chances of doing that are probably greater as a medical librarian because, whether you're employed at a university, a hospital, or a pharmaceutical company, you're solving lots of people's problems daily by unearthing the resources they need. Bonus: Each request exposes you to some new aspect of medicine, whereas a researcher generally plows away at similar things for years. And the training is shorter and easier to complete: A career in medical librarianship requires only a master's in library science. Plus, it's an under-the-radar career, so you'll have less competition for job openings.

Learn more: Medical Library Association.

4th year PhD candidate

Well crap...what do I do now?

notebook_organizer of PA @ Nov 24, 2009 10:03:47 AM

Medical scientists?: job for egomaniacs!

Okay, this is something from someone who has been in this hole for 17 years of my adult life! If any young woman or man is reading this, please run away as fast as possible from a PhD in Biomedical Science. Research is a lot of fun; there aren't many jobs where people pay you to test your thoughts, even when those thoughts are sometimes foolish. However, it appears that this is not a job for people who value modesty. You will work with people with egos as tall as Mount Everest and, before you know it, they will suck you into this extreme ego worship. People doing Life Science research to solve problems are few and far between; most people do it simply to feed their ego! Some are so bad you dare not ask them to rethink their bogus ideas. Biomedical research is the best job in the world if only the charlatans could be removed. But they are so entrenched at the top it is almost impossible to remove them, and they are very good at reproducing themselves!

jamie @ Nov 21, 2009 03:39:09 AM

Only a few percent should EVER do this

So, I agree that you can make more money. But there is not enough money in the world to make me want to do research. It is very lonely. Yeah, maybe you collaborate once in a blue moon, generally via email. Yeah, maybe you talk to your coworkers while interrupting an hour of silence. But there is little to no interaction when you think about the spectrum of jobs available. This is another reason scientists are generally poor at socializing, conversing, and communicating.

Secondly, you will spend your entire life discovering something that will most likely end up being insignificant. I agree that the more science that is done, the more progress we make. But there is a lot of garbage being published that is likely to help no one, and people spend years on it.

I will say that over the years I've met maybe a handful of people who truly belong in research. They love it for everything it is worth. They love discovery and are curious about things that people can't even fathom. But I am telling you the vast majority of people in the career got here because they are smart and wanted to do something prestigious. I can't tell you how many grad students, post docs, and professors complain about their jobs. I do not see a high level of satisfaction. What I will say is that there are a few people out there who LOVE it, but the majority don't. They got into this career for the wrong reasons.

hater of CO @ Nov 13, 2009 18:38:07 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

The 10 Best Places to Find a Tech Job

IT service jobs—in engineering and in software services—have fared well in this economy.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!