Road-Testing Cars of the Future

6 cutting-edge vehicles hint at what Americans may soon be driving

By Rick Newman

Posted: March 20, 2009

If, by chance, you're heading to the Alternative Fuels and Vehicles conference in Orlando in April, bring your lab coat and goggles. There will be a biodiesel exhibit, a "summit" on fuels produced with algae, and seminars on propane, natural gas, and biomethane. And if you thought hydrogen was the holy grail of fuels, guess again: This year, it's battery power.

Ever since the automobile displaced the horse and buggy a century ago, almost all cars have run on fuel derived from oil. But a new revolution is underway, and this time, it's the fuel that's poised for a makeover. At this year's Detroit Auto Show, auto execs who used to rhapsodize about hood scoops and horsepower enthused about emission-free tailpipes and energy independence. General Motors is staking its resurgence on a battery-powered car that plugs into a household receptacle. Other big automakers are seeking the same kind of killer app that Toyota found when it introduced the Prius hybrid almost 10 years ago. "This is about the new DNA of the automobile," says Larry Burns, GM's research and development chief. "The recession and its impact on the auto industry amplifies the need for a diversification strategy."

[See the pros and cons of 8 green fuels.]

There are a lot of compounds besides gasoline that are capable of powering a car, and government subsidies have spurred the adoption of a few, including corn-based ethanol in the United States and diesel in Europe. But gasoline has prevailed because it still offers power and convenience at a lower cost than almost anything else.

That equation obviously shifted for a while last year, when gas prices in the United States crested at $4 per gallon and buyers fled big vehicles. Although pump prices have drifted back below $2—partly because of the global recession and slack demand—automakers are planning for a future in which gas once again hits $4 and then goes higher. Other factors are working against gasoline, too: discomfort over imported oil, concerns about global warming, and technological advances that could make alternatives cheaper.

So, for the next decade or so, there will be a worldwide energy derby as the backers of half a dozen plausible fuel systems battle one another for prominence under the hood. But vehicle design and infrastructure needs will eventually coalesce around one or two winners to take advantage of high-volume production, which is essential to lowering costs.

[See the 12 most important cars of 2009.]

Ethanol and other biofuels are appealing because they'd require only modest modifications to today's internal combustion engines. But so far, biofuels don't seem to represent the dramatic leaps in energy efficiency—or the sweeping transformation of the automobile—that many engineers think is possible. If an automotive revolution arrives, it will probably be powered by hydrogen or electricity. Engineers still have several puzzles to solve, like dramatically lowering cost, getting the fuel to consumers, and determining the best way for it to power the wheels. The following prototypes and early production vehicles demonstrate the most promising alternatives to gasoline. Their success or failure will help determine the kinds of cars Americans are driving a decade from now.

Honda Clarity. This road-ready prototype gets the equivalent of 74 miles per gallon, with good performance and no tailpipe emissions. Here's how: Hydrogen stored in a tank mixes with oxygen in a "fuel cell" about the size of a carry-on suitcase that functions as an onboard power plant. The electricity it produces powers a motor that spins the wheels, while a lithium-ion battery kicks in every now and then to supplement the car's power, just as in a hybrid. The powertrain is novel, yet the driver presses the pedals and turns the steering wheel the same as in any other car. "Honda brought in clean technology without changing the way driving feels," says Jack Cusick, an assistant principal in Orange County, Calif., who is one of about 200 drivers who will participate in a prototype test program.

Comparing things to hell, and safe autos.

Hell will happen. For writers to use the word as if it meant little is for them to misuse what is very real in the future for every ungodly person. Running cars takes and causes heat. Hell will be very hot indeed. Passengers in autos want to be comfortable and safe. It's good to dream about how this can best be accomplished in a land of the free and home of the brave. Hopefully it will be in autos or other vehicles made in the U.S.A. And by companies owned by free citizens of the land.

Ray Downen of MO @ Aug 31, 2009 20:08:23 PM

Re: Build it and they will come

1) The US is the largest supplier of the oil we use, the two top foriegn suppliers are Canada and Mexico

2) You can't use Solar PV to charge your Volt overnight, so no matter how you slice it, a Volt will be primarily a COAL powered vehicle.

3) Someone who only drives 5,000 miles per year will never come close to saving enough in gas, even at $4/gal to pay the $8,000 premium over a Prius ($15,500 premium without Tax Rebate)

Someone who drives 80 miles per day, would put nearly 30,000 miles per year on the car. Even so after 5 years and 150,000 miles, they would still be ahead by over $5,000 by driving a 45mpg Prius at $3/gal.

While people might buy the Volt to make a statement such as: "I prefer a Coal Powered Car" or "Not Zero Emissions, Emissions Somewhere Else", the economics suggest that the Volt needs to come down by about $15,000 to be able to compete with existing Hybrids.

The fact that almost all our Lithium comes from two South American countries pretty much precludes that from happening.

It may not be OPEC in our future, but if we build our tranport future around Lithium Batteries, it will be OLEC.

Arthur Doucette of TN @ Aug 15, 2009 09:01:09 AM

Build it and they will come

I suspect if Chevy does end up selling the 2010 Volt as planned it will get a VERY warm welcome in the states for three reasons:

1) Americans hate OPEC (possibly even more than Al Queda) and buyers can attach 'up yours OPEC' bumper stickers on their car and feel really good that they are helping curb America's reliance on foreign oil.

2) Buyers will get a one-time $7500 tax credit. And SMART buyers can then sink that $7500 rebate into solar products for their home with enough power generation capacity to easily charge their Chevy Volt every night--thereby making their Chevy Volt a 100% 'green mobile' because they then won't be drawing electricity from a coal fired grid and thus no CO2 will be produced in driving 40 miles a day (just as with hydrogen fuel cells). And when they purchase the solar roof panels they get ANOTHER big tax rebate which they can use to buy more electrical solar generation for their home or another Chevy Volt! That's a total win-win solution to both the OPEC AND the CO2 problem. If every American did this--sinking their $7500 rebate into solar panels for their home to charge their Volt--and Chevy could make enough Volts--imagine how this would impact OPEC! (and reduce CO2 generation).

3) Most drivers commute less than 20 miles one way to work or drive less than 40 miles a day. For example, typical retirees drive less than 5000 miles a year and rarely drive more than 10 miles a day. So for these buyers they will never use ANY gasoline at all and this really put the whammy on OPEC in addition to preserving the environment even if they don't buy solar panels to charge the Volt. And if a buyer has to go twice the number of miles as the electrical range (40 miles) and drives 40 miles to work each way, then assuming the Chevy gets 40 mpg on gasoline in gasoline only mode then they are actually averaging 80 mpg which is far and above the Toyota Prius or any vehicle currently in production.

Americans should be more energy aware and realize that the entire energy cycle of extracting coal, to burning it for electricity, and charging batteries for auto propulsion is more efficient than that of extracting oil from deep sea wells (where most of ours comes from now) to refining the oil into gasoline, to transporting the gasoline (by 5 mpg trucks) and finally burning the gasoline in very inefficient automobiles.

The long term future probably lies in hydrogen fuel cells but the technology and capability of converting to a hydrogen economy is decades away--it's simply too expensive at this time for the infrastructure changes. And state IV nuclear plants are still decades away and fusion power 50 to 100 years away to effectively produce enough hydrogen gas cheaply.

So until that day arrives a Chevy Volt makes a hell of a lot of sense. I will certainly buy one and attach one of those 'Up your OPEC' stickers on mine!

wowlfie of CO @ May 04, 2009 09:59:28 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

15 Government-Heavy (and Recession-Resistant) Cities

Cities that have lots of government workers have proven recession-resistant.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!