America's Credit Catastrophe

The financial freeze starts to envelop Main Street. Thanks, Wall Street

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: October 3, 2008

The Consumer

No one should be shocked to find out that spendthrifts with a wallet full of maxed-out credit cards are having a tough time getting loans these days. But even responsible consumers—the ones who follow such formerly passé advice as paying their bills on time each month and buying only houses they can afford—are starting to notice higher interest rates and less access to credit.

When Amanda Tossberg, a public relations consultant in Nashville, went to buy a 2008 Mazda Speed3 in late June, she was shocked when the dealer offered her and her husband close to a 10 percent interest rate on a $13,000 loan. "I said, 'What's the point of spending all these years working to build good credit if you're not going to get rewarded for it?' " recalls Tossberg, who says her husband's credit score is in the 800s. She told the salesperson such a high interest rate was a deal-breaker, and after some back and forth, he offered her a rate of 4.9 percent over 60 months.

About two thirds of banks told the Federal Reserve that they tightened their lending standards for consumer loans between May and July. Many student loan providers had already done so earlier this year, and several companies, including student loan provider My Rich Uncle, recently stopped offering private loans altogether. Matthew Towson, a spokesman for Discover, says the credit card company has reduced its marketing in high-risk areas and may offer consumers in those regions lower credit limits.

Bank of America has similarly heightened its credit standards and is now more likely to refer some card applications, especially those from areas of the country experiencing more economic stress, such as California and Florida, for review by credit specialists. At the same time, the average interest rates on credit cards have remained virtually unchanged at around 12 percent, according to LowCards.com, suggesting current cardholders have not experienced any major shifts.

Indeed, it's the people with sketchier credit backgrounds who are getting squeezed. Jesse Toprak, executive director of industry analysis for car site Edmunds.com, says some customers with poor credit are now paying upwards of 20 percent for car loans. Lenders have also started requiring larger down payments; the average for new vehicles climbed to $3,000 in September, up from $2,200 earlier this year.

Consumers close to foreclosure are also under extra duress, says Robert Strupp, director of research and policy for the Community Law Center, because banks have been reluctant to renegotiate mortgage terms while they wait to learn the details of the government's plan to purchase distressed debt. But considering that much of the financial crisis was caused by easy access to cheap credit, tighter lending standards are only to be expected. - Kimberly Palmer

The Investor

After 18 years of do-it-yourself investing, retiree Alice Meyer is stumped. She faithfully stuck by a fairly aggressive portfolio of U.S. stock mutual funds through the 2000-'02 bear market, but today, she says the game has changed. "I'm not thinking as long term anymore," says Meyer, 65, of Faribault, Minn., who invests through an IRA. "I don't need the money immediately, but I don't know if it's going to be enough to last until I'm 85 or 90." Like many investors—especially retirees or those nearing retirement—Meyer is considering pulling her money out of the stock market and moving into more conservative investments. Some $43 billion flowed out of stock funds in September.

Younger investors have it easy: With decades to go before retirement, they can afford to ride out the turbulence. But older folks want assurance that their nest egg will be intact when it's needed. Just days before the Dow's 778-point drop on September 29, a fifth of people polled by Gallup said they'd seriously considered taking money out of the stock market, and 8 percent already had. "People who are most at risk are those that are five years out and five years in to retirement," says Mark Johannessen, managing director of financial advisory firm Harris SBSB in McLean, Va., and president of the Financial Planning Association. "If you just retired, you're sitting there asking, 'Do I need to go back to work?' and if you're a few years away, you're wondering if you have enough."

Biggiest "communist" country on earth

Then, how does this off-shoring impact the company? Let’s have a look at the truth.

1. The large IT infrastructure is very important and critical to our financial security – now the bank has to depend on foreign technical staff to control and manage this critical financial infrastructure of our country

2. The large financial IT infrastructure is not making tennis shoes – it needs a highly educated and very experienced workforce to design, build, and operate. These systems take year to learn. If we do not have our own engineers working on them, soon, (with no exaggeration at all) nobody in the US understands these large and highly complexes, but powerful technical systems. Is this good for our country?

3. Losing these highly paid and highly technical jobs send out a powerful message to our young people who will not get into engineering and technical areas. For example, our computer science education in the past 5 years has consistently gone down across the country.

Our business leaders know all of these, but they will still off-shore IT jobs. Why? Because by all means, the incentive structure for executive compensation does not give them any real motivation to serve the company or the country, but make themselves richer faster. By the way, they themselves and their friends make the incentive packages for themselves. Since they are not the real owners of the companies, they do not really care.

In this particular sense, we have allowed the United States of America become the biggest country in the world in terms of public ownership of businesses. In addition, it is a twisted public ownership because by all means, it is call “private ownership” though in any possible economic means, it is a pure public ownership.

Public ownership does not work. Communism in whatever format will fail. Without fixing the divorce between ownership and managerial power of our large companies, we will get out of one mess only find ourselves in another, possibly a worse one.

Ken Lay of TX @ Oct 15, 2008 23:12:04 PM

Not surprising at all because the USA is the biggest "communist" country on earth - part two

Then, how does this off-shoring impact the company? Let’s have a look at the truth.

1. The large IT infrastructure is very important and critical to our financial security – now the bank has to depend on foreign technical staff to control and manage this critical financial infrastructure of our country

2. The large financial IT infrastructure is not making tennis shoes – it needs a highly educated and very experienced workforce to design, build, and operate. These systems take year to learn. If we do not have our own engineers working on them, soon, (with no exaggeration at all) nobody in the US understands these large and high complexes, but powerful technical systems. Is this good for our country?

3. Losing these highly paid and highly technical jobs send out a powerful message to our young people who will not get into engineering and technical areas. For example, our computer science education in the past 5 years has consistently gone down across the country.

Our business leaders know all of these, but they will still off-shore IT jobs. Why? Because by all means, the incentive structure for executive compensation does not give them any real motivation to serve the company or the country, but make themselves richer faster. By the way, they themselves and their friends make the incentive packages for themselves. Since they are not the real owners of the companies, they do not really care.

In this particular sense, we have allowed the United States of America become the biggest country in the world in terms of public ownership of businesses. In addition, it is a twisted public ownership because by all means, it is call “private ownership” though in any possible economic means, it is a pure public ownership.

Public ownership does not work. Communism in whatever format will fail. Without fixing the divorce between ownership and managerial power of our large companies, we will get out of mess only find ourselves in another, possibly a worse one.

Ken Lay of TX @ Oct 15, 2008 23:05:09 PM

Not surprising at all because the USA is the biggest "communist" country on earth

The US decline is not surprising, because it is the biggest ‘communist” country on earth. Its private companies, the backbone of the country, such as AIG actually are very public, with so numerous owners that by all means they belong to the general public.

However, the false assumption of private ownership, the executives of these companies pay no attention to the long-term health of the companies and the interest of the general public, but focus on how to get fatter faster. The divorce of power and ownership is the key of American business and economy failure. From Enron to Wachovia, it has proven that the leaders of our large “private” companies have no other interest but satisfy their own tremendous greed by all possible means as long as they can get away with it.

The divorce of ownership and managerial power also eloquently explains the constant power struggles, absurd reorganizations, and violent turbulent typical of large American companies. Alas, the best brains of our country are employed with laser focus to fight each other for more power and more money!

Have a look at real private such a SAS where none of such stupidity and absurdity exits. For example, a large bank has off-shored its IT operations. On the paper, with the salary difference, there are huge savings. The executives get big bonus as a result. In fact, due to the loss of productivity resulting from loss of intellectual capital and experience, there are tremendous business losses in IT system stability. However, there are no laws forcing companies reporting how their IT divisions operate. In addition, every company in its right mind will not publish its IT operation problems. Therefore, the fact that this off-shoring is losing large amount of money is not generally known. Therefore, the executives who are responsible for the loss continue to harvest huge amount of bonus. When all the tier one executives have a reward of a few more million dollars, who will speak up and tell the truth that the bank is losing big money on this off-shoring deal of IT operations?

Then, how does this off-shoring impact the company? Let’s have a look at the truth.

1. The large IT infrastructure is very important and critical to our financial security – now the bank has to depend on foreign technical staff to control and manage this critical financial infrastructure of our country

2. The large financial IT infrastructure is not making tennis shoes – it needs a highly educated and very experience workforce to design, build, and operate. These systems take year to learn. If we do not have our own engineers working on them, soon, (with no exaggeration at all) nobody in the US understands these large and high complexes, but powerful technical systems. Is this good for our country?

3. Losing these highly paid and highly technical jobs send out a powerful message to our young people who will not get into engineering and technical areas. For example, our computer science education in th

Ken Lay of TX @ Oct 15, 2008 22:55:01 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

15 Government-Heavy (and Recession-Resistant) Cities

Cities that have lots of government workers have proven recession-resistant.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!