A New Direction on Wall Street

The feds take unprecedented actions to save the financial system

By Rick Newman

Posted: September 19, 2008

Panic and uncertainty have sent markets reeling.

Panic and uncertainty have sent markets reeling.

Whether or not more firms merge on their own, it seems certain that the recent generation of a freewheeling Wall Street is ending. Washington will subject more financial firms to the same kinds of regulations that now apply to regular banks—especially if they're taking advantage of cheap federal loans or other government largesse.

In the end, what does the credit crisis mean to the average person?

There is a smidgen of good news here. Those who invest regularly through retirement accounts are now getting deals on shares that were pricier before, albeit after having seen their nest eggs decline by double-digit amounts, says Brad Sorensen of the Schwab Center for Financial Research.

What's more, mortgage rates have also dropped; the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate fell to 5.78 percent last week from 6.52 percent in August, according to Freddie Mac. That is prompting a rash of refinancing. As investors searching for safe havens in a rough market turn to "quality" vehicles such as treasury securities, the yield on 10-year notes has gone down. Since 30-year mortgage rates tend to follow the yield of 10-year treasury notes, they have also fallen, explains banking consultant Bert Ely. But whether this will last depends as much on overall confidence in the market as much as the economic fundamentals.

At the same time, credit card, auto loan, and mortgage lenders are increasingly picky about their borrowers after being forced to write off an increasing number of consumer loans. So while consumers with good credit can borrow money more cheaply, those with sketchier credit histories are finding it more expensive—if they can get approved at all.

Picky lenders. Higher rates. Hard-to-get credit. It's a scenario that Wall Street understands all too well these days.

Why Not Nationalize Banks?

I WISH SOMEONE WOULD EXPLAIN WHY GOVT BODIES PAY INTEREST?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279 Money As Debt

Instead of printing money, and paying no interest, why does our government (federal, state, and local) borrow money and pay interest?” After all, they do have the power to pay their bills with the money they print. Why does our government pay interest on debt? What am I saying? Just one simple example, New York builds a toll road and the federal government says, “Here’s the cash to pay for it (I printed the cash you need last night) just pay me back out of your small tolls–no interest please.” Where’s the turnpike bonds, investment banks, etc. in this equation? Not quite like aid to a foreign country (because New York would pay the principal back out of fees collected).

David of OK @ Oct 09, 2008 11:45:53 AM

A New Direction on Wall Street

If you want to go in a new direction, you fire Fed Chairman Bernanke and Treasury Sec. Paulson, not SEC Chairman Chris Cox which Senator McCain suggests. Anybody that believes in free enterprise would not want to get bailed out by the government. After all, they're the rednecks. The go it alone people. The Investment Bankers, which are trying to play it both ways, are in bed with the stock market while trying to pretend they're a bank which is a joke. The problem is though, us working people who depend on the Commercial Banks, are really confused about why Senator McCain wants to fire SEC Chairman Chris Cox. Any fifth grader would know that the problem is in the banking sector and the people you would be firing would be Fed Chairman Bernanke and Treasury Sec. Paulson. You definitely wouldn't hire these people to manage the bailout! It definitely is a conflict of interest. Where's the media on this one? It even sounds suspicious about why this has to be done all in one week. Even before the FBI has a chance to investigate, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Lehman Brothers. I believe they will find out that these DERIVATIVES they are selling are WORSE than JUNK BONDS. Also the HEDGE FUND DEALERS selling them, particularly the ones headquartered offshore, should go to jail rather than get golden parachures and bonuses. I hope the media asks the candidates these questions so we have answers before the election so that we don't end up with another Herbert Hoover or worse.

Yours truly, Disgusted Middleclass Taxpayer, LaVern Isely

LaVern Isely of WI @ Sep 24, 2008 15:22:26 PM

Capitalism becomes communism

"Who would have thought that the United States would nationalize its financial assets?" asks economist James Barth of the nonprofit Milken Institute. Nationalization of private institutions and industries is communism, not capitalism!

Roberta of OR @ Sep 23, 2008 17:56:15 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

Sponsored Poll

What factor do you think is responsible for the majority of teen-driving crashes?

View Results

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!