The Outlook for Investing in Green Energy

How to deal with a sector that has pop—and could go pop, too

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: July 23, 2008

Inflating a Green Energy Bubble
Venture-capital investment in a range of clean technologies has risen steadily. The figures cover North America, Europe, China, and India.

You've probably seen this movie before. Deep-pocketed investors swarm research labs in Silicon Valley and fledgling companies in generic office parks, searching for world-changing technologies and the promise of untold profits. Before long, the great Wall Street hype machine starts to crank into gear as a few highly buzzed stock offerings explode onto the market. Business magazines pronounce the sector as the Next Big Thing. And off in the distance, a few curmudgeonly killjoys start talking about a bubble eventually going bust.

Shades of the dot-com bubble-and-bust cycle are seen again on Wall Street, this time with a green tint. Over the past few years, the media blitz about the threat of global warming, combined with a superspike in oil prices, has enabled green-technology entrepreneurs to raise billions of dollars in venture capital. But stock investors, looking for opportunities in a down market, are pretty psyched up as well. A quick glance at the shares of First Solar, Wall Street's current favorite, is illustrative. The thin-film solar cell maker made headlines as the "Google of solar" with a share price to match. It hit $288 a share on July 16, up more than 900 percent since the start of 2007. Energy Conversion Devices, another thin-film player, has seen its shares jump more than 100 percent this year.

Fueling the fire. But whether companies are developing solar, wind, advanced biofuels, or any of a number of emerging clean-energy technologies, the combination of global economics, investor interest, and a forthcoming pro-green turn by Uncle Sam makes it hard to argue a long-run bear case against green stocks. Of course, that sort of superoptimism is itself a prerequisite for a bubble.

But, hey, plenty of money can be made before a bubble goes bust. And this one probably has a long way to go. "We're still in the very, very early stages of the game," says Brian Fan, senior research director at the Cleantech Group. "Is there a bubble? There isn't. If valuations in some publicly traded sectors are out of whack, I think it's a function of the fact there are too few opportunities for investors and there's too much demand and appetite for exposure to these technologies."

Just as investors in Chinese stocks like to point to market size as a compelling reason to snap up shares ("Hey, if XYZ Co. can capture just 1 percent of the market . . ."), so do green investors. Boosters tout most often the sheer magnitude of the energy market and the minimal penetration of any one green technology. Currently, a mere 1.5 percent of American electricity generation comes from renewable sources.

Over in Silicon Valley, stalwart venture capital funds like Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Khosla Ventures, headed by Sun Microsystems cofounder Vinod Khosla, are spreading huge bets around on a staggering variety of start-ups. In the second quarter alone, some $2 billion in venture cash flowed into the sector, according to the Cleantech Group, an all-time record, beating out a $1.8 billion influx in the third quarter of 2007. Watch the VC funds' spending for new investing ideas once markets improve and start-ups begin going public again in full force.

U.S. government support could soon be improving, too. Almost everyone agrees that the next administration will be kinder to green technology than the current one. John McCain has said he'd like to offer a $300 million prize to the inventor of a battery strong enough to power a car. Barack Obama has made investing in clean energy a core element of his economic plan. Both candidates also want to create a carbon emission cap-and-trade system, an almost seismic event for green-tech firms as companies would rush to meet new pollution regulations by adopting new technologies.

Make mine mini. So how should investors play the bubble? First, they need to understand that rather than one megabubble, a more likely scenario is that a bunch of minibubbles in various subsectors would constantly percolate, bubble, and pop.

That's certainly been the pattern so far. Ethanol makers, for instance, saw a huge jump after a massive round of venture funding in 2005. In 2006, Pacific Ethanol (backed by Microsoft's Bill Gates before his investment arm began selling last year) jumped from around $10 a share to $40 for a brief moment. It's trading under $2 today. Back in 2000, Ballard Power Systems, a fuel cell maker that embodies the first huge run-up in venture investing in the battery sector, surged to $120 a share on hopes it would win the race to power the auto sector. It trades at $4 today, having sold its automotive fuel cell business to Daimler and Ford earlier this year. Others, like VeraSun, have seen their shares slump for years.

Future of Green Energy

As a citizen and investor interested in the advancement of alternative energies, in America's future, and in managing these global wealth shifting trends, I sincerely hope we aggressively drive energy science, provide research and development dollars to these early startups, and reduce our dependency on dirty foreign oil and fossil fuels. We need a 'Hydrogen Manhattan Project' that integrates Solar, Wind and Natural Gas as a source of power to generate distributed onsite hydrogen coupled with fuel cell use. Focused research and development dollars solve problems through science advancements. Innovation and diversification into green energy is the answer for America and the world. For more information visit and bookmark my website; www.go-h2.net

John of MA @ Dec 13, 2008 20:32:19 PM

Automaker bailout 2 ???

It strikes me as odd that we want to save companies that are unwilling to go ahead and use the available technologies to improve their products. Why should we bailout a company that is the producer of mostly large, inefficient vehicles. Instead of looking outside their ivory tower, they focus on making big cars more efficient.... Hellllo!!!!! How about; dump the big cars and start a new trend of smaller more economical and reliable vehicles. I was reading an article (in your magazine) about increasing the ethanol rate to 20% in gasoline. The concern was about reliability and its effects on the durability and performance of the engines. Are you kidding??? There are dragster cars that run on pure ethanol. Cars have been running on ethanol in South America for years. And what is the deal with Flex Fuel? Companies are ok to produce a vehicle that runs on 85% ethanol but are worried about the idea of adding an extra 10% in regular gasoline engines. It doesn't seem reasonable to me. There is got to be something else that they don't want us to know. Besides, look at the advertising of new vehicles; they are, for most of them, portayed as race cars in civil clothes. What's the point? As far as I know, the speed limit in this country still is around 65 MPH!!! Large car manufacturers should show commitment to their country and citizens. It's not that they don't have the means but they prefer to be guided by quarterly reports for their shareholders rather than the public opinion and what the market needs. The technologies are out there, whether it is hydrogen fuel cells, ethanol or anything in between, it's out there and available. My question is, why don't they put it to use? Electric cars? How about a car that would use a small diesel engine (3 cylinders) as a powerplant to generate electricity for motor wheels. Think about it? No transmission, no braking system, only one pedal on the floor and that's it. Hard to swallow? It just proves that our dependance on oil is more than in our driveways. It is a habit that's been formed over the years that cars will always run on gasoline. The first electric car was invented by Henry Ford himself, Thomas Edison was building the batteries for it. What happened???

Michel Beaudry of MA @ Nov 08, 2008 09:20:05 AM

Automaker Bailout???

Talk is being reported of a possible bailout for automakers due to the poor economy and rising fuel prices and once again America fails to see the forrest for the trees!!! Instead of a bailout to continue to produce gasoline vehicles why not simply invest in Hydrogen Fueling stations to get fuel cell vehicles on the road surring our economy for everyone instead of bailing out one industry??? The National Hydrogen Association with the Department of Energy recently completed a tour accross America which spurred investment in at least 3 new fueling stations simply by creating awareness. Why should America continue rolling backwards losing money on frivilous activities??? Just as the old saying, give a man a fish you feed him once, teach him to fish and feed him forever... Instead of bailing out automakers once to continue to produce gss guzzlers which are obsolete, why not begin building hydrogen fueling stations which will feed the industry forever??? America must begin utilizing all information available instead of the hot topic of the day!!! DOE has plans for hydrogen fuel cells to be mainstream starting 2010 replacing gasoline engines by 2020 in all new automobiles so why go in reverse???

http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/index.html

Ray Fisher of NM @ Sep 04, 2008 13:44:17 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

U.S. News Rankings & Research

Best Places

Search for the perfect place for you and your family.

Best Careers

Careers that offer strong outlooks and high job satisfaction.

Car Rankings & Reviews

Make an informed choice when shopping for your next car.

advertisement

Slide Shows

15 Government-Heavy (and Recession-Resistant) Cities

Cities that have lots of government workers have proven recession-resistant.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!