The Ticker

The FASB Rally: More Dishonest Breathing Room For Banks

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: April 2, 2009

The Dow finally topped 8,000 this morning for the first time since February. Good news for investors, especially owners of bank shares worried over whether hobbled institutions would survive under the weight of all those bad mortgage assets sitting on their books.

Bank shares are up because rule-setters just made it easier for banks to obscure the value of their toxic assets. The Financial Accounting Standards Board revised its rules to allow companies more leeway in determining "fair value" for assets on their books and reduced the threat of taking big charges against earnings on investment losses. That kicks in this quarter and can be applied to the first quarter as well. Banks will be allowed to largely define their own "orderly" strategy for winding up those bad assets, which likely means fewer writedowns on losses like those required under current mark-to-market standards. Ultimately, it equals breathing room for the big banks, higher share prices in the near-term, and not much else. Today's rally aside, bank solvency is still a question (OK, THE question).

Now however, that question is actually more obscure thanks to looser accounting practices, and that's why this latest fix that should inspire some public anger (and uncertainty among investors). Banks, which got into all this trouble by essentially making up values for huge piles of mortgage-related assets, are being bailed out by easier rules letting them set their own higher values on those very same assets now that they've been deemed (by the banks) to be worth too little in the present market.

In other words, banks are still able to tell the market what they're worth. That doesn't make their balance sheets any more believable.

 

Agree with your assessment

I absolutely agree with your assessment. These are the scoundrels who, in large part, got us into this mess. Now they don't have to disclose the truth of what they've done. They can reflect inaccurate values on their balance sheets, and I presume, not have to show accurate losses on disposal of the toxic assets. Will they be showing inflated income figures, "qualifying" themselves for more huge bonuses? Running up the value of their stock prices and then cashing in? How was this allowed to happen? This has the sound of another "sleight of hand" trick played on an unsuspecting public, a majority of whom have no idea or concern about who or what FASB is. OMG, FASB is one of our regulatory agencies that's supposed to be stepping up to the plate to protect us! I am sorely disappointed.

Leigh of TX @ Apr 03, 2009 18:58:34 PM

Sadly it sounds about right.

This just shows how short sighted the decision makers are, and that we desperately need a change at the top. Playing with the numbers isn't going to affect the long term viable of the company. It is just going to make it harder to understand how much trouble the banks are in. Also, I thought we were suppose to be moving more towards IFRS and fair market valuation for assets, but this just seems to set us back.

Ab of IL @ Apr 02, 2009 14:08:47 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!