The Ticker

Bailout Bill Passes!

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: October 3, 2008

Late Friday, the House voted 263-171 to pass the $700 billion bailout for the financial sector by a comfortable margin, just days after rejecting an earlier bill, capping one of the most unsettling weeks in Wall Street history. Reports from Congress had markets guessing up to the final minutes before the vote.

What changed:

Congress got an earful. Swooning markets and angry constituents lined up to back an imperfect plan imperfectly, if earnestly, offered up by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. From the NYTimes:

Many lawmakers who changed sides, said they had agonized over the decision amid a torrent of calls and e-mail messages from constituents, and several cited a provision added by the Senate increasing the amount of savings insured by the federal government to $250,000 per account from $100,000.

That FDIC insurance increase, remember, makes the bailout a little bigger. It's a sort of bailout too, only this time the biggest beneficiaries will be smaller banks who hold more deposits rather than mortgage-stuffed investment banks.

Which brings us to the other reason the wheels were greased for a different outcome this time:

Pork. Legislators who originally blocked the bill argued that $700 billion was an absurd amount, picked somewhat arbitrarily by the Treasury, and too incomprehensible to vote for willy-nilly. Then they added on anther $150.5 billion in tax breaks and other extras, and somehow the number seemed just about right.

A failure to pass the bill would have been devastating for markets. The first failure Monday sent the Dow down 777 points for its single biggest drop since the 1987 crash.

What's next: Now, we move to a less dramatic but equally important phase of sorting out the credit crisis. Treasury gets to buy up $700 billion in bad assets held by investment banks and put a value on them. The biggest unanswered question is exactly what that will be. If the price it sets is deemed too low, more banks will swoon. If Treasury overpays, the bailout really does become a gift to fat-cat banking executives bought with taxpayer money. Expect blame to fly in both directions as the plan unfolds.

Best of luck.

pork

I would like to know the congressmen or senators who put the pork in this bail-out so we can throw them out

Nancy of FL @ Oct 06, 2008 09:53:12 AM

Is this the only way?

It seems to me that Congress overlooked tons of options to increase credit facility, without re-rewarding the fatcats that caused it in the first place. Some interesting reading:

http://www.zkeletenz.com/fatcat-bailout-or-replacement?

Ken Richards of NY @ Oct 05, 2008 17:27:24 PM

Bailout for the rich

This bill is a travesty. It does nothing to help the homeowner. It is designed to help Henry Paulson't friends and associates at the banks and brokerage houses.

Te better solution would have been to provide a government guarantee for the mortgages themselves and provide help for the homeowner.

The homeowner would have been helped directly and the banks and others would have been helped when the mortgages were guaranteed by the government.

The present plan is an extension of trickle-down economics -- pour some money into the top of the economy and hope a drop or two makes it down to the bottom.

We should impeach Bush, throw out Paulson and dissolve the Fed.

Barry of NJ @ Oct 05, 2008 15:01:01 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!