The Ticker

Solar Subsidy Mayhem!

By Kirk Shinkle

Posted: July 1, 2008

A reminder about investing today in the solar sector: It's not about technology. It's not about earnings. Right now, it's all about government largess.

Witness Spain's disappointing plans for 2009 subsidies. Basically, Spain is reportedly considering an aggregate subsidy cap of 300 megawatts on new solar installation for 2009 and offering a lower price on electricity produced from solar systems. Discussion includes paying a rate about a third less for energy produced in rooftop systems and 41 percent less for ground-based systems. The total cap is also a far cry from the 3,000 MW of new capacity that some analysts said would be needed to keep Wall Street happy.

Stocks started falling Friday after Lehman's Vishal Shah warned of the possibility of stingier subsidies. Bloomberg is reporting that cuts of up to 35 percent in the rate paid for photovoltaic solar generation systems could be on the table. It cited reports in Spain's Cinco Días newspaper.

Here's the damage so far today (as of about 3 p.m.):

Canadian Solar (CSIQ): down 6.7 percent

Suntech Power (STP): down 6.49 percent

SunPower Corp. (SPWR): down 7 percent

Solarfun Power Holdings (SOLF): down 5.95 percent

First Solar (FSLR): down about 1 percent

Evergreen Solar (ESLR): down 3.4 percent.

Lehman's Shah had this to say today about the solars tanned with Spanish rays:

[Block]In the near term, we continue to advocate a more selective approach toward the sector as increased volatility due to concerns about potential outcomes in Spain beyond September could continue to weigh on stocks with high Spain exposure. Companies with high Spain exposure include CSIQ, STP, SPWR, SOLF (Not covered), YGE. Companies with low Spain exposure include FSLR, ESLR. Maintain longer term constructive view of the sector. [EndBlock]

It's important to note that today's news simply considers what future subsidy plans might look like, not a concrete policy. So shares could move back up. But the day's volatility (and similar swooning around previous subsidy announcements from other big solar markets like Germany) provides a primer on what the near future holds for the sector.

Industry hopefuls point out that with oil above $140 and new technological breakthroughs on the horizon, we could be just a few years from doing away with the need for government subsidies to support the solar energy market. In the meantime, however, investors will remain mired in the challenging business of divining bureaucratic whims.

Disclosure: The author owns shares of ESLR.

What works for NASA doesn't necessarily mean it will work for the rest of the market. NASA also seems to think that shooting rockets into the air at tens of thousands of miles per hour, but you don't see the airline industry exactly rushing to use that technology. I am well aware of the power solar panels can achieve, but in terms of viability it just does not generate as much power as traditional energy sources, such as oil, gas and coal. This is what you AE proponents don't get. You say AE is not just about solar and wind, but other kinds of AE propositions. Yet, none of these ideas have proven viable. It will take years to determine which of these AE proposals are viable, but in the meantime, you have to still use hydrocarbons until you find that viable energy (and even after it is found, we will still use hydrocarbons, just far less of it).

I do have kids, but I sure don't want my kids to look back and see how we were utter buffoons when it comes to energy.

Chris of AZ @ Jul 07, 2008 12:10:09 PM

I wonder why you don't think it's a viable tech.. Have you studied what a concentrated solar array can do? NASA seems to think they work just dandy. Maybe the key lies more in engineering efficient electronic devices, I don't know.

But AE isn't just solar and wind. I like the tidal and algea stuff being born.

Anyway, it is clear as day that we can't continue to burden our children and grandchildren with the system we have grown up with. And when one day you have children and grandkids,there 'll come a time when you may be willing to sacrifice a greater share .

If you believe you will be wiser in your old age, you may think like me., in that I'll take a hit now because all the crap that happened on my watch.Last post, sorry. gopher.

of @ Jul 02, 2008 23:04:13 PM

Actually, I don't mind my opinion being checked. I don't admit I have the answers (after all if I did, I wouldn't be making $35K a year). What I am saying that why should solar get a subsidy if it has not proven itself as a viable technology? All we the taxpayer would be doing is throwing money into a blackhole that benefits the solar industry, without putting out anything in return. That's not smart policy, not smart economics, not smart sense.

Besides, why should solar be favored over other forms of alternative energy?

Chris of AZ @ Jul 02, 2008 22:05:41 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Ticker

The Ticker

Kirk Shinkle is a senior editor at U.S. News. He writes daily about ups and downs in equity markets, sectors and stocks. Formerly, he covered business and economics on both coasts for Investor's Business Daily.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!