The Inside Job

A Quiet Factor in the Unemployment Rate

By Liz Wolgemuth

Posted: September 2, 2009

Last month, 19 of the nation's metro areas had unemployment rates that reached 15 percent or higher. The national average was 9.4 percent. Of those 19 areas, 8 were in California and 5 were in Michigan. Cities with the highest unemployment rates were El Centro, Calif., at 30.2 percent, and Yuma, Ariz., at 26.2 percent. "In addition to being affected by the economic downturn, these two adjacent areas are highly agricultural and experience extreme weather during summer months," the Labor Department reports.

One interesting thing to look at is how labor force growth, or decline, may contribute to the unemployment rates in these cities.

Between July 2008 and July 2009, the total U.S. civilian labor force actually fell by a tiny margin—about 2,000 workers. Labor force participation generally falls in very bad job markets, as people who are not in need of work, or become discouraged, stop looking for it.

In some cities, however, the labor force has jumped. The metro area of Visalia-Porterville, Calif., faces an unemployment rate of 15.3 percent—and the area's workforce has increased by 3.6 percent in the last 12 months. Grand Junction, Colo., has the highest metro area unemployment rate in the state, but it's workforce has grown 3.9 percent, while the size of the labor force has fallen in every other Colorado metro.

When workers drop out of the market, that can help push the unemployment rate lower, because the number of job seekers shrinks. But when the number of participants increases—and the number of jobs dips or stays flat—the unemployment rate can climb.

Even the Yuma, Ariz., labor force grew by 3 percent between July 2008 and July 2009. El Centro's labor force grew by 2.3 percent.

On the other hand, Bismarck, N.D., registered the lowest unemployment rate among metro areas in July, at 3.1 percent. The labor force has shrunk by 2.4 percent over the same period.  (Certainly, many other factors are at work here. Bismarck has also added some jobs since January.)

Immigration is the main problem here

From US News

"Employers slashed another 263,000 jobs last month, the Labor Department reported today. That brings nonfarm employment down to the level of 2004, when there were about 7 million fewer U.S. workers."

The key issue here is why there are now 7 million more workers in the US than there were in 2004. It is due to immigration, both legal and illegal. The US is currently about 150,000 new legal immigrants each month! Add to that the illegal tide coming across the border, the poor us economy and you have massive unemployment. Its time to start adjusting the number of visas given based on the strength of the economy.

RTC of CA @ Oct 03, 2009 08:21:56 AM

Time marches on.

People look for work for beating out a living. They get a little money ; get credit cards; try to keep up with the Jones's. One day they wake up , & realize , Hey! I can't stretch it anymore! They put in overtime. Taxes take the biggest chunk. They try til they can't sleep anymore. They sometimes wind up divorcing, or in bankruptcy court. Then just when we think it can't get ANY worse, guess what comes along ? RECESSION..... Layoffs , well; maybe we can make it on unemployment til things get better... things rock along and benefits run out . kids need dental work. Wife ( if you still have one) needs surgery. Female problems. Well; you know , if we had just saved our money like our parents taught us, we just might not be in this pickle. Certainly , we would have been in a better situation than sitting here with our car repossesed & our lights cut off. I'll bet you if we get through this ; we ARE going to save that paltry$5.00 a week if that's all we can afford . I bet we'll throw toss credit cards in thr trash next time ; too !! Five years later; NAH... We forgot all about that misery... lol Friends ; I hope not !!

Mike of AL @ Sep 24, 2009 20:16:39 PM

Fed Up with Business as Usual

I agree with RTJ of Florida, and Muser of NM.

The deck is stacked, the game is rigged.

I think that the biggest culprits are corporate execs who get multi-million dollar bonuses, even in years when their company has a loss. It is unjust when these corporate execs reduce the wages of the ordinary workers while simultaneously padding their own pockets with ridiculous bonuses and golden parachutes.

Think auto company execs, think Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Merrilly Lynch brokerage house. It's just wrong. It's not illegal, but should be.

Barack Obama, please spur congress to limit corporate CEO bonuses to 10% of profit, and have it paid out over 5 years, depending on the profit in each of these years. This encourages corporations to focus on long-term, not short term, and it encourages top execs to mentor those under them, because your bonus might be largely dependent on how well your successor does with company profits.

Tax bonuses and stock options at double the average income tax rate. Eliminate capital gains taxes. Stop helping the rich get richer at the expense of everyone else.

Signed, a fed-up mom who hopes the world will be a better place for all of our children, not just for the rich and lucky ones.

Maggie of WI @ Sep 24, 2009 20:06:16 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Inside Job

The Inside Job

You're taking a break from your job-hunting and job-hopping ways and have decided to stay put in your current position. Liz Wolgemuth’s careers blog will show you how to make the very best of your job, each day.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!