The Inside Job

In Bozeman, Giving Up Privacy For a Chance at a Paycheck

By Liz Wolgemuth

Posted: June 19, 2009

As if job seekers needed further proof that employers have the upper hand in this economy--city officials in Bozeman, Montana are asking applicants to list the various elements comprising their web presence (blogs, chat groups, Facebook or MySpace accounts, etc.) along with the passwords they use to access the sites.

The policy invites all sorts of privacy questions--the American Civil Liberties Union is no fan--but it also speaks to the challenges facing the unemployed in this market. A piece in the WSJ earlier this month--aptly titled "What Won't You Do For a Job?"--told how a Connecticut toymaker asks applicants to bring three years worth of W-2 forms to interviews, where they are put through a battery of simulated work tasks and surveys. The company describes its process as a bit "rough around the edges." This screening process seems pretty mild, however, compared with some of the other requests job seekers faced--such as supplying 12 references, or giving a business presentation half a dozen times in a day.

However painful for those looking to join a payroll, the fact is that employers can apparently afford to put these kinds of requirements on applicants when they're facing down piles of resumes for fewer openings--they're desperate for new methods to filter the potential hires. I recently wrote about the increased use of psychologists in job interviews--not just increased use of psychological tests but actual face time or telephone conversations with psychologists. It's not a new practice, but it's experiencing something of a revival.

Time will tell if the more extreme methods pan out for businesses in the recovery. In Bozeman, city officials insist that their controversial request is not a requirement, and keeping your passwords private won't get your application tossed out. 

Kazelptg

Hi!wmvp! http://xrjvyooe.com vwxtr cwhfg

Aboutbcpjx of CT @ Jul 21, 2009 05:17:40 AM

No way in hell

My response would be to turn the paper around to them and say "you first, starting with your human resources databases".

Who in their right mind would agree to such a thing? And even if you were that desperate it is trivial to set up a fake account full of fake things like posts about how much you love to work and help people. :P

Not that desperate of OH @ Jun 21, 2009 12:32:22 PM

Something seriously wrong with employers

Tactics such as these raise serious questions about the *existing* staff of the employers. Hiring is a mix of different features and has as much art involved as statistical predictability.

If the HR department requires this much information about a prospective employee, how did the employer ever make it this far? Does the employer have *any* intuitive sense at all? Or is this a sign of no ability to make a decision?

Quantity of information does not make quality of employee. Too much information often clouds the decision process or masks the lack of one.

I'd seriously question the stability and environment of any potential employer using these tactics and if there was any way possible, move on.

Sad to say a municipality using these tactics most likely suffers from crippling bureaucracy.

Ted of IA @ Jun 21, 2009 01:39:45 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Inside Job

The Inside Job

You're taking a break from your job-hunting and job-hopping ways and have decided to stay put in your current position. Liz Wolgemuth’s careers blog will show you how to make the very best of your job, each day.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!