The Home Front

Expanded First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit Becomes Law

By Luke Mullins

Posted: November 6, 2009

In the hopes of sustaining the real estate market's recent momentum, Uncle Sam has made more than two-thirds of current homeowners and nearly all first-time buyers eligible for thousands of dollars in tax perks when they purchase a house. President Obama signed the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009 into law Friday, a day after the House of Representatives approved it by a 403-to-12 vote. The legislation includes language that significantly expands the popular first-time home buyer tax credit that was enacted in February. The development represents a big victory for the real estate and home building industries, which had to overcome concerns about the measure's costs while rallying support for its enactment. Here are five things you need to know about the development:

[See First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit Gets Obama Nod.]

1. For first-time home buyers: While the value of the credit remains as high as $8,000, the new law pushes back the deadline by which qualified first-time home buyers must make their transaction in order to claim it. (The legislation defines "first-time home buyers" as anyone who has not owned a principal residence in the three years prior to making the purchase.) Under the previous law that went into effect in February, buyers needed to close the transaction by Nov. 30. However, under the terms of the new law, home buyers must have a signed sales contract before May 1, 2010, but they have until the end of June to actually close the transaction. At the same time, the new law raises the annual income limits from $75,000 to $125,000 for singles and from $150,000 to $225,000 for married couples. The changes make nearly all first-time home buyers eligible for the credit, according to Goldman Sachs economist Alec Phillips.

[Also see New Home Buyer Tax Credit: 7 Things You Need to Know.]

2. For current home owners: In addition, the new law makes most current homeowners eligible for a tax credit of up to $6,500 when they purchase their next primary residence. Under the terms of the legislation, current homeowners must have lived in their home for five consecutive years over the previous eight to be eligible. Qualified home buyers can obtain the credit on homes purchased between Nov. 7 and the end of April 2010. That means they need a signed sales contract on a home before May 1, 2010, but they have until the end of June to close the sale. The income limits for current homeowners are the same as those for first-time home buyers. About 70 percent of current homeowners are now eligible for the credit, according to Phillips.

3. Additional specs: The credit can only be claimed on primary residences purchased for less than $800,000. And as long as they use the property as their primary residence for three or more years after the purchase, buyers don't have to pay it back. Furthermore, buyers can claim the credit on their 2009 taxes, even if the purchase was made in 2010 by filing an amended return.

[Check out First-Time Home Buyer Tax Credit: All Sorts of Sketchy Claims]

4. Fighting fraud: The first-time home buyer tax credit became the subject of controversy in late October, when a Treasury Department inspector general told Congress that his office had identified hundreds of millions of dollars in questionable claims. The suspicious cases included taxpayers who claimed the first-time home buyer credit even though it appeared that they had owned residential property within the previous three years, as well as taxpayers who claimed the credit before actually purchasing the home. Hundreds of taxpayers younger than 18 years old—and at least one who was just four—also claimed the credit. And by expanding the initiative to include more than two-thirds of current homeowners, the potential for incorrect or fraudulent claims has only increased.

To that end, the new law includes measures designed to limit its abuse. Anyone claiming the credit must now provide documentation—such as a copy of their HUD-1 Settlement Statement—to prove that the sale has closed. In addition, it also bans anyone younger than 18 years old from claiming the credit.

5. Price tag: First-time home buyer tax credits have cost the government around $10 billion in lost revenue through Aug. 22. The expanded credit program is projected to cost an additional $10.8 billion or so. Amid mounting concern over massive government spending—the federal budget deficit for fiscal year 2009 was $1.4 trillion—some economists have questioned whether additional home buyer subsidies are really the best use of taxpayer cash. The financial blog Calculated Risk, for example, estimates that the February first-time home buyer tax credit cost the government roughly $43,000 for every additional home sale it generated.

Economists at Goldman Sachs have estimated that the February first-time home buyer tax credit would trigger an additional 200,000 sales by the end of the year. Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, puts the figure closer to 400,000 by the end of November. Nevertheless, Goldman's Phillips argues that the new law won't have a game-changing impact on the housing market. That's because only 14 percent of first-time home buyers who had been ineligible for the credit can now participate thanks to the higher income limits. Meanwhile, the credit's expansion to current homeowners may increase sales activity. "However, these sales would not result in a reduction of the inventory on the market, since every buyer taking advantage of the move-up credit would necessarily be a seller (of their existing principal residence)," Phillips said in a report. Nevertheless, the expanded credit could boost home prices by about 1 percent, Phillips says.

Corrected on 11/09/2009: A previous version of this story incorrectly stated the date when home buyers must have a signed sales contract. The date is May 1, 2010.

Annoyed^2

The Annoyed crowd makes an excellent point. When this credit was initially designed, previous homeowners were set to receive the credit. Those owners were only negotiated out of the original credit in the last hours before it was provided. Now, politicians see the error in their ways and have made the credit available for all homeowners, as was originally intended. This makes perfect sense. After all, isn't it previous homeowners who suffered by the drop in home prices in the first place? First time buyers benefit from the drop in home prices as it is. At the very least, this credit should be available to all new purchases retroactive to the date the credit was initially established, the date when politicians erroneously negotiated previous homeowners out of the credit. I'll be contacting my politicians directly. Those who agree should do the same. You may disagree with the nature of this credit. If there is going to be a credit, it's hard to legitimately argue that previous homeowners don't deserve it from its inception.

thosewhotookitonthechintobegin of OH @ Nov 27, 2009 11:12:44 AM

Agreed^2

The Annoyed crowd makes an excellent point. When this credit was initially designed, previous homeowners were set to receive the credit. Those owners were only negotiated out of the original credit in the last hours before it was provided. Now, politicians see the error in their ways and have made the credit available for all homeowners, as was initially intended. This makes perfect sense. After all, isn't it previous homeowners who suffered by the drop in home prices in the first place? First time buyers benefit from the drop in home prices as it is. At the very least, this credit should be available to all new purchases retroactive to the date the credit was initially established, the date when politicians erroneously negotiated previous homeowners out of the credit. I'll be contacting my politicians directly. Those who agree should do the same. You may disagree with the nature of this credit. If there is going to be a credit, it's hard to legitimately argue that previous homeowners don't deserve it from its inception.

Thosewhotookitonthechintobegin of OH @ Nov 27, 2009 11:10:28 AM

Fern

My problem is with the part in the requirements that keeps a person form buying from a relative. We bought a house with the plan to sell it to our daughter when she could get a loan. This was in Dec. 2008. Now she CAN NOT BUY THE HOME FROM US AND GET THE TAX CREDIT. WHAT IS WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY? We did not know anything about the tax credit (it was a repayable loan at the time) or we would have put it in her name at the time of purchase. Now we are screwed by our goverment!! How about that for a good goverment?

Fern Smith of MO @ Nov 25, 2009 23:20:16 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!