The Home Front

How Barack Obama's Bailout May Differ From Henry Paulson's

By Luke Mullins

Posted: January 16, 2009

After all their griping and groaning about the shortcomings of Hank Paulson's gigantic financial bailout, lawmakers moved Thursday to ensure that Barack Obama will have access to the second chunk of $350 billion when he takes office. By a 52-to-42 vote, the Senate rejected a measure that would have denied him access to the cash. How did this happen? Well, in addition to the still-perilous state of the economy and financial system—Bank of America just hit up Uncle Sam for another $20 billion—the incoming Obama administration has promised to make a number of specific changes to the bailout's implementation. Here's a look at some specific areas where the second half of the bailout may differ from the first.

1. Foreclosure mitigation. Even after being prodded by lawmakers and other members of the Bush administration, Paulson steadfastly refused to use bailout cash for foreclosure mitigation. This infuriated some members of Congress—such as House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat—who moved to impose foreclosure mitigation as a condition for the release of the second $350 billion. As a result, the new administration is promising to include foreclosure mitigation in the bailout. "The Obama Administration will commit substantial resources of $50-100 [billion] to a sweeping effort to address the foreclosure crisis," Larry Summers, the incoming director of the National Economic Council, said in a letter to top lawmakers. "We will implement smart, aggressive policies to reduce the number of preventable foreclosures by helping to reduce mortgage payments for economically stressed but responsible homeowners, while also reforming our bankruptcy laws and strengthening existing housing initiatives."

2. Tracking the cash. The bailout has been slammed for failing to spark renewed bank lending, one of its original objectives. Moreover, critics have been angered by bailout recipients' inability to make clear exactly where the federal dollars have been put to use. The Obama administration intends to tackle this issue as well. "The Treasury will require detailed and timely information from recipients of government investments on their lending patterns broken down by category," Summers said in the letter. "Public companies will report this information quarterly in conjunction with the release of their 10Q reports."

3. Executive compensation restrictions: The Obama administration also says it will put more restrictions on executive pay by requiring "that executive compensation above a specific threshold amount be paid in restricted stock or similar form that cannot be liquidated or sold until the government has been repaid," Summers said in the letter.

4. Limiting acquisitions: The use of bailout cash to finance acquisitions has also stirred controversy. As a result, the Obama administration has made promises to restrict certain deals. In implementing the second $350 billion, the incoming administration will "preclude use of government funds to purchase healthy firms rather than to boost lending," Summers said in the letter.

Make the bastards pay it back

I don't see why these CEOS are still at their desks when most other workers would have been fired for even less, and they didn't WREAK economic havoc affecting millions of people. My god, are these dealmakers even thinking?

Moreover, whoever invented CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS should be made to pay back all of the ill-begotten funds made out of anything that had to do with this unregulated show market.

Incredulous of CT @ Jan 27, 2009 18:08:38 PM

OVERSIGHT

THIS AMOUNT OF CASH NEEDS TREMENDOUS OVERSIGHT. I WOULD CREATE AN AGENCY JUST TO OVERSEE IT. IT NEEDS A PAPER TRAIL AND THERE MUST BE JUSTIFICATION FOR EACH DOLLAR SPENT.

HOW DO YOU KEEP THE DISHONEST CROOKS FROM USING THIS MONEY TO COVER THEIR TRACKS OR BRIBE THEIR WAY OUT OF A BAD SITUATION.

350,000,000,000 = 350 BILLION

JIM of NC @ Jan 27, 2009 11:51:55 AM

Bailout

The senate before any more loans or bailouts should make sure no money goes to ANY bouns for any CEO or Excutive for doing a job they did not do on their salary,if they did the money they should not NEED

Goorsky of IL @ Jan 26, 2009 08:52:54 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!