The Home Front

6 Things to Know About the Fed Rate Cut

By Luke Mullins

Posted: December 16, 2008

The Federal Reserve on Tuesday cut its federal funds target rate by more than three-quarters of a percentage point to a range of between 0 and .25 percent. The decision signals that Fed Chief Ben Bernanke is more concerned with the rapidly deteriorating economy--which has been mired in a recession since December of last year--than the prospect of stoking inflation. “Since the Committee's last meeting, labor market conditions have deteriorated, and the available data indicate that consumer spending, business investment, and industrial production have declined,” the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee said in its statement. “Financial markets remain quite strained and credit conditions tight.”

Here’s how the Fed’s actions affect you:

1. Fixed mortgage rates: Today’s rate cut will have little if any impact on 30-year fixed mortgage rates, which are determined by factors that operate largely outside of the Federal Open Market Committee’s reach, says Keith Gumbinger of HSH Associates. “Any change in the rate has little to do with long-term mortgage rates,” he says. But in its statement the Fed said it could expand a recently announced program to buy up debt and mortgage-backed securities from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that has already driven mortgage rates down to a very attractive 5.28 percent, according to HSH Associates. It also reiterated that it was looking at the possibility of buying long-term Treasury bonds. Both of these announcements could work to bring rates even lower.

2. Prime rate: The real impact of today's cut will be felt by consumers with products that are tied to the prime rate, a benchmark rate that typically moves in lock step with the federal funds rate. "The only place where you would see a concrete impact at the consumer level would be things that are directly tied to prime," says Mike Larson, a real estate analyst at Weiss Research. Many home-equity lines of credit and certain credit cards with variable interest rates are tied to prime rate. As such, borrowers with these products could see their interest rates decline.

3. Home-equity savings: Home-equity lines of credit averaged 5.5 percent in October but dropped to 5.26 percent in November following the Fed's half-point cut. Gumbinger says he expects average rates on home-equity lines of credit to experience similar declines this time around--but not everyone will be able to take advantage of them. That's because many of the interest rates on these products are already at their minimums and are contractually prohibited to go any lower. So check the terms of your home-equity line of credit to see if you are eligible to cash in on the decline.

4. Target vs. effective: When credit markets are functioning normally, Fed rate cuts reduce banks’ cost of funding, which allows them to widen profit margins and pass along savings to consumers in the form of lower interest rates. But today’s credit conditions have changed all that. Although the Fed’s target rate stood at 1 percent before today’s cut, such funds were actually being traded in the market at much less than that--just 0.18 percent as of yesterday before the Fed’s action. Although the Fed can usually control the effective rate by buying and selling government securities, the credit crisis has eroded its ability to do so. “Any juice that you would get from a funds rate cut in a normally functioning market, you’re not really going to get that here,” Larson says. “It’s not going to lower the banking industry’s cost of funds, because the banking industry’s cost of funds is already below the target rate anyway.” That means that interest rates tied to the federal funds rate won’t decline as much as they otherwise would have.

5. Now what? Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight, expects rates to go all the way to zero in a matter of weeks. “The Fed has already cut the federal funds rate to 1 percent and is likely to take it all the way to zero by the end of January,” Behravesh said in a recent report, issued before today’s announcement. “Once the overnight rate is at zero, the Fed may have to engage in ‘quantitative easing’ [direct purchases of long-term Treasuries].” Even if it doesn’t bring rates all the way to zero, the Fed signaled Tuesday that it’s not about to push rates higher anytime soon. “The Committee anticipates that weak economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for some time,” the Fed said in the statement.

6. Expect more unexpectedness. With only less than a quarter of a percentage point left to cut, look for the Fed to get even more creative in its efforts to revive the financial markets. New programs to support different corners of the credit market could certainly be introduced in 2009. “The Federal Reserve will continue to consider ways of using its balance sheet to further support credit markets and economic activity,” the Fed said in the statement.

Corrected on 12/17/08: An earlier version of this article incorrectly referred to home-equity lines of credit as home-equity loans.

Economic Recovery Plan

The focus needs to be on the middle class engine, not Wall Street or individual sectors such as the auto industry. Focusing on the middle class engine will pull these vertical sectors of our economy along as we recover from the economic turmoil.

Housing statistics provided by the US Census Bureau were used to support my plan for moving the economy forward. The Census Bureau statistics tell us that the adjusted median home value virtually doubles every 30 years.

The plan will use the current value of real estate along with the projected future value of real estate to help facilitate loaning money to real estate owners allowing them to continue to own there homes and investments. The loan origination will come directly from the federal government and provide the low interest rate, for example 2 percent. The numbers are better as the loan rate gets closer to zero.

These loans will take into account the current real estate value and projected values up to 30 years out. These loans will also take into account the applicants ability to pay back the loans.

The federal government can use Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac to provide low interest loans. This plan will also go a long way toward making a large portion of the high risk mortgages good.

Example of how the program should work:

A person owning a primary home, a vacation home and an investment home as an example requesting a loan would have their current home values defined. Current valuation based on property taxes could be used as a way to quickly define home values. Assume a 30 year period for the loans in the examples. Each of the 3 properties will be eligible to be used as collateral in 3 separate loans. The loan amount to be funded could be up to 80% of the expected value of the real estate 30 years out.

Assume a single family home in MA current value $325,000. A vacation home in Florida current value $175,000. An investment home in Florida current Value $140,000. Based on the doubles in 30 years formula the projected values of the 3 homes will be $650,000, $350,000, and $280,000 30 years out. Loans based on 80% of the projected values of each home will be $520,000, $280,000 and $224,000 for a potential total loan amount of $1,024,000.

The monthly loan pay back amounts based on a 2% interest rate are $1,922.02, $1034.93 and $827.95 for a total monthly mortgage of $3,784.90.

Also based on Histoical information the property values would cover the outstanding balance of the loans in less than 8 years.

A program such as this will get the economy quickly moving forward again.

Steve Willis of MA @ Jan 01, 2009 08:17:09 AM

Charge off

I was asked by my sister what will happened if her second loan

was charged off by her lender.Does she need to make payments

or is another collection agency be assigned to collect the whole amount.

emelina of CA @ Dec 30, 2008 19:52:05 PM

things to know about the fed rate cut

I think it's time the government rewarded the SAVERS in this country instead of those who just spend, spend, spend, often beyond their means. Why not give folks with incomes of under $100,000 an extra 3-5% on their savings accounts as a way to encourage a reversal of our dismal lack of savings in this country. Why must the fed always place the non-saver's burdens on the backs of those that do save.

susan of MI @ Dec 20, 2008 12:08:48 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!