The Home Front

Sen. Dick Durbin: Let Bankruptcy Judges Alter Distressed Mortgages

By Luke Mullins

Posted: November 20, 2008

The issue of bankruptcy reform--allowing bankruptcy judges to change the terms of distressed mortgages on primary residences--is set to take a higher profile in next year’s congressional debate over how to fight foreclosures.

With the election putting a Barack Obama in the White House and expanding democratic majorities in Congress, bankruptcy reform’s outlook has brightened. But a tough fight with the industry looms, and enactment isn’t at all certain at this point. The industry argues that such changes to existing law would result in higher mortgage rates--the last thing the downtrodden housing market needs.

Sen. Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, is leading the charge to implement the change:

U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) chaired a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing [Wednesday] on the foreclosure crisis facing American homeowners and its impact on families, communities and the economy. Durbin, one of the first in Congress to warn that the subprime mortgage meltdown could lead to a larger economic crisis, argued that hundreds of thousands of at-risk homeowners could keep their homes if allowed to alter the terms of their mortgages in bankruptcy…

In the fall of 2007, Durbin introduced the Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act; a bill which would allow mortgages on primary residences to be restructured in bankruptcy – like virtually every type of personal debt, including vacation homes and family farms. This small change to the bankruptcy code could help hundreds of thousands of homeowners avoid foreclosures while continuing to fulfill their new mortgage obligations.

Over the past year, Durbin has tried three times to pass this proposal - as part of Majority Leader Reid’s housing bill in the spring, as part of the Senate Banking Committee’s housing bill in the summer, and as part of the financial rescue bill this fall. Each time, the Mortgage Bankers Association and most of the financial services industry opposed the proposal.

“The question that faces us now is this: after committing over one trillion dollars in taxpayer money to what has largely been an unsuccessful effort to address the foreclosure crisis and save our economy from a devastating recession, why don’t we take a step that would indisputably reduce foreclosures and that would cost taxpayers nothing?” Durbin asked….

A large coalition of groups has voiced their support of Durbin’s Helping Families Save Their Homes in Bankruptcy Act. They include: AARP, AFL-CIO, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, NAACP, Service Employees International Union, Consumer Federation of America, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Center for Responsible Lending, Consumers Union, National Fair Housing Alliance, Opportunity Finance Network, Consumer Action, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, Central Illinois Organizing Project, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, National Association of Consumer Advocates, National Community Reinvestment Coalition, National Consumer Law Center (on behalf of its low income clients), and U.S. PIRG.

foreclosure

H E L P I have been trying to write to Sen Durbin. My children are going to loose their home because HSBC will not rewrite their mortgage. They had a sub prime mortgage that was eventually sold to HSBC. It is a round robin. Their crdit is not wonderful. They are paying tremendouls rate every month. They can afford the house if the rate is lowered. I do believe they pay around 9% They were told to make 6 payments more at this tremendous amt $2,800 a month and then they can lower their rate by that time they will owe everyone else and will be way under again. We have been helpping them but cannot continue to do so. Why can't they refinance now. They can comfortably make $2000 pay ents each month and still meet all their other obligations. My daughter went back to work to help with the bills but they are struggling. They have lived in the house 5 years and have run into some bad time. Please put us in contact with someone who can help. He has exhausted all avenues and HSBC would rather get the house back then help them? Just some names would help. Thank you I didn't know how else to rach Sen Durbin

Ilene Evins of IL @ Dec 18, 2008 07:43:41 AM

Retroactive Cramdowns

Maybe the system could function as well or better adding in bankruptcy and cramdowns as a possible additional risk to be borne by lenders. But only if it is prospective. IF Durbin and others succeed in retroactively imposing cramdowns on existing loans that were made in reasonable reliance on clear law explicitly not allowing the cramdowns, lnders would have to plan to price in any other unknown and similarly painful and costly legislative reductions in their rights-- the cost of credit will be much higher as a result.

Flory of AR @ Dec 03, 2008 00:46:07 AM

Cram Downs and MBA Kittle's Testimony

Kittle's recent testimony is an obvious concoction: He argues that allowing BK judges to cram down mortgages would raise rates for all borrowers since new risk premiums would have to cover cyclical downturn risk: This is a red herring argument. If banks went back to responsible lending and required mortgage insurance for anything less than 20 percent down and did not facilitate liars loans, there would be almost zero increase in risk premium. MBA's Kittle conveniently fails to acknowledge the concept of mortgage insurance which was standard fare before the lax underwriting standards--zero down, liar loans, etc became par for the course. Cram downs have been allowed on second homes and lien stripping is allowed in the 9th district for primary residents and these allowances don't seem to have made too much of a difference as far as folks pursuing "cram downs". Simply put, a bankruptcy judge is in the best position to look at somebody's situation and determine if they are attempting to game the system. If somebody is lying to the judge, this is a felony. Kittle's rate raising argument holds even less water if cram down provisions are implemented to stem default rates of existing mortgages that run risk of foreclosure. If there was a grandfathered period that applied to folks who bought in the last 5 years, one would be hard pressed to make the case that primary residential mortgages going forward should include a risk premium for potential cram down. Kittle is a tool of the MBA and banks that have created the secondary market for troublesome loans/fueling irresponsible lending. It's time to pay the fiddler, Mr. Kittle.

Justin McCarthy of CA @ Nov 22, 2008 13:25:53 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!