The Home Front

Freddie Mac to Hank Paulson: $14 Billion Please…

By Luke Mullins

Posted: November 14, 2008

With all this talk about TARP spending, it’s easy to forget about the billions of dollars the government is on the hook for after its decision to seize America’s troubled mortgage-finance behemoths.

Freddie Mac--one half of the government sponsored enterprise duo that was put under conservatorship in September--is hitting up Hank Paulson for nearly $14 billion after a steep third-quarter loss put its net worth into negative territory.

The $25 billion loss was tied to the deteriorating housing market and tax-asset writedowns.

Under the terms of Freddie’s agreement with the Feds, the housing finance giant can get funds--up to $100 billion--from Treasury if its regulator determines that its liabilities exceed its assets, which--thanks to the huge loss--is now the case. (Freddie’s net worth is now roughly negative $14 billion.)

From the release:

Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE) today reported a net loss of $25.3 billion, or $19.44 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared to a net loss of $1.2 billion, or $2.07 per diluted common share, for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.

As a result of the net loss, at September 30, 2008, the company’s stockholders’ equity (deficit) totaled $(13.8) billion. Pursuant to the company’s Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (Purchase Agreement) with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury), the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has submitted a request to Treasury under the Purchase Agreement in the amount of $13.8 billion. The Purchase Agreement is discussed below under “Purchase Agreement.”

And that’s not all. Fannie Mae is facing similar pressures. From Bloomberg News:

Fannie said this week it may need more than the $100 billion in funding pledged by the Treasury to stay afloat.

“This commitment may not be sufficient to keep us in solvent condition or from being placed into receivership,'' if there are further ``substantial'' losses or if the company is unable to sell unsecured debt, Fannie said in a Nov. 10 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Short sales?

Since Jan 2007 I have been trying to talk to my lender and I have feeling that this econony will bring bad news to my family. Then I lost my job and got a new one but my pay rates is not the same. Bottom line I got a paycut from the new company..So every month I am checking with my lender and my 9 months saving will not last long and now its happening I could not pay..I try to refinance my house but the house is upside down..

I would like to keep my house but I have to think of my two daughters one in College and one in High School. Both of then will graduate in two years. I have been talking to my lender and does not want to help me because I am current in payment. Now the moment of truth has come my 9 month saving is fading I could not make a payment

for the last two month and still insisting I am only late 60 days..This is insane and ridiculious.. Do I need to play thier game to get a help..

So what is best solution on my situation..

If the lender does not want to deal with you..

What is the best solution..

A. Short sales

B. Forcloses

C. Be Patient talk to a Lawyer?

D. Leave the house while my credit is still good..

Dennis de Guzman of CA @ Nov 14, 2008 15:43:28 PM

Gresham's Law

Does anyone in finance remember Gresham's law? Gresham, a few hundred years ago, stated that bad money will always force out good money, but good money cannot force out bad money. My interpretation is that the bailout is just pouring water down a rathole unless there are changes in the thinking of those handling funds. Why are the same CEO's in charge without strict oversight and controls? Obviously those in control have the same mindset that produced the problem.

Helen Rockwell of OH @ Nov 14, 2008 15:10:55 PM

Foreclosed homes already taken from homeowners

What recourse do homeowners have now that everyone in financial trouble are receiving help, however, the foreclosed homeowner has lost all.

The homeowners who have lost their homes also could prove financial difficulty, loss of jobs, and lost of income. Are we just passed by as "bad luck victims"?

My home was approved for a short sale by my mortgage company for $240,000.00. However, when the deal was about to be complete, the mortgage company backed out stating they were no longer giving short sales.

Once they obtained title to the property, they listed it for sale at a price of $169,000.00. If this type of option had been offered to the homeowner, I could have kept my home and made the payments with no problem.

My home was also one of the sold to one lender and transferred around to several others.

Do I smell a upcoming lawsuit ..... class action perhaps? IF so, I'll be the first in line.

Thank you for listenting.

Lana McKenzie Johnson

Lana@hsmattys.com

Lana McKenzie-Johnson of FL @ Nov 14, 2008 14:03:54 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!