The Home Front

Home Prices Rise! (and Fall …)

By Luke Mullins

Posted: May 27, 2008

Despite the release of a happy-seeming set of housing figures, the nation's real estate market swan dive continues.

Providing a much-needed zap of optimism, a government report issued today found that the average price of new homes was up 3 percent in April from the previous year. That's on top of an above-consensus 3.3 percent increase in sales from March.

Now, which one of you soul-killing economists is going to tell me this is bad news?

"The price numbers would be a lot more exciting if we hadn't had the other depressing ones released at the same time," says Robert Brusca, chief economist at Fact and Opinion Economics.

That's right. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices were also released today. This second, well-respected report showed house prices "in a freefall," according to Patrick Newport, U.S. economist at Global Insight.

The U.S. National Home Price Index fell more than 14 percent—the largest drop of its two-decade-long history—in the first quarter of 2008 compared with the same period last year. At the same time, the 10-city and 20-city composite indexes posted fresh record declines.

"The Case-Shiller index is more scientifically set to compare apples to apples, so it should be a more accurate index," Brusca says.

Even worse, home prices still have plenty of room left to fall, says Ian Shepherdson, chief economist for High Frequency Economics.

From a report issued today:

Inventory of existing homes is still very close to its record high so prices will continue to fall rapidly. Since its May 06 peak the Case-Shiller index is now down 15.7%; we expect the peak-to-trough drop to reach 25-to-30%.

Well, how about the increase in sales in the government report? That's still good news, right?

Nope, according to economists at Goldman Sachs:

New home sales rise by 3.3%, but that should not be read as a turnaround. The increase follows two months of substantial declines, with sales down by 11.0% in March and February by 4.2%. Declines that large tend to be followed by a partial rebound. Further, there were substantial downward revisions to prior months; these essentially offset any positive news from the increase.

Seriously, guys, you couldn't hold off a day or so before releasing the depressing report? At least this time we could have gotten a decent night's sleep before you kicked us in the pants.

Suburban Sprawl v/s Living in the City

A few weeks ago I heard a story on NPR

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89803663

that quoted David Stiff, chief economist for the company that produces the Case-Shiller Home Price Index that correlated home price data by distance to transit, CBD’s or employment centers within metro areas instead of metro area to metro area. The finding was that there was a direct correlation between the percent of decline of value and distance of commutes, suberbs v/s cities, drive time v/s mass transit. If this is true it would be great for the public (at least the urban public) and policy makers to see published/charted so they have a more precise understanding of scope and uneven impact of this dramatic housing meltdown.

ChicagoRandy of IL @ May 27, 2008 22:16:56 PM

Residential Republicans?

Has anyone ever done a trend analysis that compares the rise in home prices to the rise of the "new" Republican conservative base?

Maybe I'm all wrong, but it seems to me that when Main Street was making easy money with real estate and their homes they got more Republican ... you know, "Free Market", "we do enough for the lazy poor" and no regulation required. Tax breaks for the "investment class" made perfect sense, as the wealthy invest everyone prospers ... right? Hard working, honest people became "suckers" and stupid for not playing the speculation game.

Ya think that attitude may be shifting?

One thing they didn't mention about the "Free Market" is that it is perfectly predatory and constantly changing - if you aren't in it to win it 100%, you are what's for dinner. Regulation depends on who's making the rules; if the predators own the the rules (and they do) it's just a question of which "homeowner small investor" is next. Like all the great predators, the herd is thinned one at a time so the herd doesn't panic and leave. Taking the old, young and impaired first.

So, as the wannabe rich become the usedtobe solvent how will they feel about not being predators and becoming the prey? Maybe fairness and ethics will gain greater consideration?

Seriously, anyone in Media willing to track the trends?

Michael King of CA @ May 27, 2008 20:38:00 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Home Front

The Home Front

Associate Editor Luke Mullins tracks the treacherous housing market and explains how to unload a five-bedroom McMansion or even find that dream home.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!