The Collar

What's Different About Israel's Tough Sentence?

By Luke Mullins

Posted: April 16, 2008

Ellen Podgor—over at the White Collar Crime Prof Blog—makes a great point about the 20-year sentence that Bayou Group cofounder Samuel Israel received Monday:

This time it is 20 years for a white collar offender. But unlike Bernie Ebbers who received 25 years, Jeffrey Skilling who was given 24 years, and the Rigas sentences of 20 and 15 years—the accused—Samuel Israel III—plead guilty.

In the past, the exorbitant sentences have been given for the most part to individuals who risked trial. We have seen individuals who enter pleas receiving lower sentences, like six years (Fastow) in return for testimony.

But what happens when you have no one to testify against and when the amount of loss is high? The co-founder of the defunct hedge fund Bayou Group found out that the reduction for a plea brought it to a sentence of 20 years.

Start the discussion! Be the first to comment on this story.

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Collar

Luke Mullins is an associate editor at U.S. News, covering banking, real estate, and white-collar crime. He came to the magazine from the American Banker, a financial services daily newspaper, after a stint in the Peace Corps in West Africa and 18 months coaching baseball in the Dominican Republic. Mullins earned a master's degree in journalism from Syracuse University in 2005 and now lives in Washington, D.C., where he grew up. He has written about white-collar criminals for the American magazine, and his work was included in 20 Something Essays by 20 Something Writers: The Best New Voices of 2006, a Random House anthology that appeared on the Boston Globe's bestseller list.

People who read this also read ...

Best of The Collar

advertisement