The Best Life

Will More Reverse Mortgages Mean More Fraud?

By Philip Moeller

Posted: July 1, 2009

The rising popularity of federally insured reverse mortgages attracted 1,500 new lenders into the program last year, more than doubling the total of participating lenders. And while reports of consumer abuse and fraud are infrequent, legislators and regulators are calling for strengthened oversight to protect seniors from aggressive or outright unscrupulous lenders.

The federal Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) program allows homeowners aged 62 and up to borrow money against the equity in their homes. The funds are available as lump sums, regular payments or lines of credit. Borrowers can remain in their homes as long as they're able without making further mortgage payments. They do, however, need to pay property taxes and insurance and keep up the home. The interest payments on the money they borrow are paid to lenders out of the remaining equity in the home. If borrowers stay in the home long enough to use up all their equity, they generally face no further financial obligation to the lender.

[See The New Rules of Reverse Mortgages.]

At field hearings this week in St. Louis, convened by Missouri Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, attention was focused on beefing up the legally required consumer consulting sessions that are supposed to help potential borrowers understand the complicated HECM program and make sound decisions. As it turns out, according to a report by the General Accountability Office (GAO), the sessions often exclude key information that consumers should know. Under current rules, counseling sessions also can be done on the telephone, and some regulators feel face-to-face meetings should be required.

The GAO also reviewed HECM lender marketing materials and highlighted six promotional claims and reasons they might mislead consumers:

1) Never owe more than the value of your home.
Borrowers or their heirs could have a loan balance greater than the value of the home. While they could walk away from the property and not owe the money, they would need to pay it if for any reason they wanted to keep the home. The GAO said this was the most common misleading statement it encountered and was even made in government materials that were later changed.

2) Implications that the reverse mortgage is a “government benefit” or otherwise, not a loan. HECMs are federally insured but they are a loan, not a benefit.

3) "Lifetime income" or “Can’t outlive loan”.
Borrowers can arrange to receive monthly payments so long as they stay in the home. But the payments cease when they leave or if they violate other conditions of the mortgage.

4) Never lose your home.
Lenders can foreclose on a HECM borrower’s home if the borrower did not pay property taxes and hazard insurance or did not maintain the house.

5) Misrepresenting government affiliation. Some materials include government symbols and logos, and imply the lender is a government agency.

6) Claims of time and geographic limits. Some lender claims falsely imply that HECM loans are limited to a certain geographic area, or that the consumer must respond within a certain time to qualify for the loan.

Additional concerns were raised by Anthony G. Medici, a Housing and Urban Development criminal investigator. Again, while actual abuses are not large in number, he testified that the rising attractiveness of HECM loans, coupled with growing financial needs among seniors, makes the program more susceptible to fraud. A specific fraud involving "hundreds" of current cases, he said, recruits phony home buyers who move into abandoned or foreclosed properties that have been purchased for little money. Using fraudulent HECM applications, a reverse loan is executed on the property and funds are paid out in a lump sum to the organizers of the fraud. Some of the buyers are innocent, Medici said, and are forced out of the home because they can't pay for upkeep, insurance and taxes.

[See Is a Reverse Mortgage Right for You?]

Use of HUD Logos in Advertising

Is prohibited by HUD, because it implies to the consumer that they are dealing directly with the government, or that a particular vendor is government-approved.

However, use of the Equal Housing logo (the house with the two lines in the middle) is required.

Carol Hannibal of OR @ Aug 17, 2009 18:30:15 PM

Reverse Mortgages

My name is Tony, my parents took out a reverse mortgage mid 2008 and it was the best thing they did. The home was free and clear.They took out the reverse mortgage with the credit line option. So far, to date the balance owed on the home which were just the closing cost has increased approx. $729.35 and the credit line has increased in availability $8,624.31. If they do not touch any further funds from their line in 10 years they will have an additional $92.548.17 in addition to the $ 211,589.61 that they could have taken as a lump sum if they wanted too. That's a total of $304,137.78. The home is not even worth the intial 290,000.00 that it was appraised at when they took out the reverse. Not everyone benefits from the reverse mortgage but if you dont know about them you should not comment on them.

Tony M of FL @ Jul 20, 2009 15:31:44 PM

reverse mortgage

My name is Mary V Headley, I took out a reverse mortgage on my home last August/september, as my husband died leaving me with a lot of financial problems, although I had a good job, my son has terminal cancer and is now living with me. I took out the R.M so that I could retire I was 69 and very tired and wanted to stay home and take care of my son, however my SSecurity was not enough to pay bills and the home payment. I did not realize at the time that they were going to charge me $30.00 a month for having the account, plus my Insurance went up because of the loan, and I was told the interest rate would not go up but they send me a statement every month and the interest is going up, five years from now should I die, I will owe more than my home is worth. and my children will have nothing. Can I try to sell the home and pay of the mortgage, then there might be enough over to give my children, and I can check out low income housing and take care of my son. if you could contact me at 850-678-2869 or write me Mary Headley 1405 22nd street, Niceville Fl.32578. I would appreciate it. I am having computer problems and I may not get your email, should you try to email me, but you can try. thankyou very much Senior Citizen

mary veronica Headley of FL @ Jul 11, 2009 02:58:00 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Best Life

The Best Life

Contributing editor Philip Moeller writes about the people, ideas and programs that provide "best life" retirement solutions and opportunities.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!