The Best Life

Poor Social Security Knowledge Has Big Costs

By Philip Moeller

Posted: September 9, 2009

Social Security is the primary source of retirement income for most Americans. Even among affluent people who have built solid retirement plans, Social Security is an important source of stable income that is often used to cover fixed living expenses. Given its importance and central role, you'd think people would take the time to understand the program. And, of course, you'd be wrong.

[See Tips on Social Security Claiming Strategies.]

It is a cardinal rule of column writing that it's bad form to criticize your audience. So, let me be clear that I know Best Life readers are informed about Social Security, have taken the time to factor it into a sensible retirement plan, and have crafted a smart strategy for when to begin claiming Social Security benefits. Congratulations! But perhaps you will take pity on your uninformed friends and colleagues and see if they might benefit from some of your insights. Based on lots of research findings, they need the help.

Academics Hugo Benitez-Silva, Berna Demiralp and Zhen Liu surveyed more than 1,000 people of all ages and posed some fairly basic questions about Social Security. They weren't surprised at the small numbers of correct answers they received. In fact, they used that finding to help build a model of how much better off people would feel if they were well informed about Social Security rules and their benefits. The answers they obtained were that younger people didn't feel that much better, probably because their Social Security benefits were still decades in the future. However, as people aged, the value of understanding the program rose, and by the time people turned 60 years of age, 95 percent of them "got it" about the value of understanding Social Security. In fact, they would have been willing to pay a fair amount of money to make sure they had access to the best possible information.

Here are four of the basic questions people were asked. I know that you know the correct answers but humor me: 1) What's the minimum age at which people can begin collecting Social Security? 2) What's the earliest age at which people are entitled to full benefits that cannot be reduced by any outside earnings? 3) If you delay claiming Social Security, what's the maximum age at which your benefits will no longer increase each year (excluding cost of living adjustments)? 4) How many years must you have worked, and received W-2 statements, to be eligible for Social Security payments when you retire? And the envelope, please:

  1. 62 years of age; 48 percent got this right.
  2. It depends on when you were born. The so-called full retirement age is between 65 and 67; about two-thirds of those surveyed answered this correctly.
  3. 70 years of age; only 23 percent knew this.
  4. The equivalent of 10 years, or 40 quarters of earnings spread over a longer period; only 22 percent of those surveyed answered this question correctly.

[See Billions in Social Security Not Being Claimed.]

Now, there are degrees of being informed. Complete information was the norm for a lot of early academic research. Studies were based on the assumption that people took action based on complete information, and that when they did act, they behaved rationally. Of course, the real world doesn't work that way, and the field of what's called behavioral economics has boomed in the past 10 years. If people don't know all the information, they tend to make flawed decisions but they have a partial factual basis for what they decide. "On the other hand, under unawareness, they completely ignore some of the possibilities," the economists said in their study, "and thus cannot exploit any relevant information."

In the case of Social Security, there is a lot of unawareness. The researchers did find that people would be more willing to acquire information about Social Security if they understood how valuable it was to their future quality of life. But how do you convince people to solve a problem when they don't recognize they even have that problem?

The Social Security Administration has been pumping out annual benefit statements, reminders and pamphlets for nearly 75 years. It's been aided for the past several years by an enormous Web site that, if anything, may put off consumers by being too extensive. But people, even those near retirement, clearly have not been sufficiently impressed to do their homework. They haven't been motivated by a compelling value proposition. Walmart, for example, has fared well by adopting a tag line for tough times—"Save Money. Live Better."

Mottos, anyone?

[See also Is It Time to 'Super-Size' Social Security?]

Wow, Dale, really?

There can be no crisis because all that must be done to avoid a crisis is raise the taxes. "Raise taxes" is a phrase that flows too easily. Why not? Go ahead. No one is watching anyway.

Raise taxes? Yes we can.

Jason of OR @ Sep 10, 2009 09:21:27 AM

When to take Social Security

I think the biggest gap in awareness is around when to begin taking Social Security. Many assume it's best to take it at age 62, but that's not necessarily true. For those who continue to work part time, are healthy, have good "genes", and have sufficient income to cover fixed expenses, it's best to delay taking benefits for as long as you can. For each year you delay taking benefits, your benefit will increase by about 8%, and in this economy, that's a great return on investment. This assumes that Congress doesn't meddle with the program and change the rules. At some point they will have to do that. I just hope they Grandfather us old timers who are approaching our full retirement age in without penalty.

Jim of CO @ Sep 09, 2009 17:35:51 PM

people grossly misinformed about social security

The facts that people don't understand about Social Security pointed at by your essay are not very important.

The much more important lack of understanding that 99.9% of the people, and 99% of commentators have about Social Security is that they haven't a clue about how it works and why it works that way, and therefore why there is no "crisis" and can never be a crisis in Social Security.

The facts are not hard to understand, but there is an entire industry devoted to confusing the people, and that includes most commentators and reporters.

Social Security is an insurance program for workers, paid for by workers. If the cost of benefits ever exceeds the tax income that supports it, it would be very easy to increase the tax -- really the insurance premium. The projected cost of that increase... due entirely to the fact that the people paying the tax are going to be living longer than the people the last time the tax rate was set... will be about 80 cents per week in some but not all years between now and 2085... with the first such increase not needed until 2026 or so. Meanwhile incomes will be going up ten dollars per week every year on average.

Dale Coberly of OR @ Sep 09, 2009 13:33:14 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Best Life

The Best Life

Contributing editor Philip Moeller writes about the people, ideas and programs that provide "best life" retirement solutions and opportunities.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!