The Best Life

Housing Bust Deals a Cruel Blow to Older Homeowners

By Philip Moeller

Posted: March 9, 2009

Home foreclosures, sub-prime loans, and underwater mortgages have understandably dominated concerns about the collapse of the housing market. Yet plunging home values have also triggered equally devastating consequences for the retirement hopes of millions of older homeowners. Perhaps even more than falling retirement-plan investments, 30 percent to 40 percent drops in housing values are destroying the very foundations of retirement for people who did all the right things and played by the rules. Dean Baker, founder and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), spoke to largely closed ears and minds as far back as 2002, when he warned of an imminent housing collapse. He has since turned his attention to the impact of that collapse on older Americans.

Falling home prices have "decimated the wealth that baby boomers have accumulated in their working years," he said recently in Senate testimony. The median net worth in households with a person aged 45 to 54 has fallen by more than 45 percent during the past five years, dropping to $94,200 this year from $172,400 in 2004. For people aged 55 to 64, the decline was worse: a nearly 50 percent drop in median wealth to $159,000 in 2009 from $315,400 in 2004. Because most housing equity is held by older homeowners who've been paying down mortgages for many years, they are disproportionately hurt the most by plummeting home values. Younger consumers, by contrast, will eventually be able to enjoy great housing bargains due to lower prices, causing Baker to view the loss of an estimated $7 trillion in home equity as nothing less than an enormous inter-generational transfer of wealth.

"Real house prices have fallen by more than 30 percent from their peak in 2006," Baker said in similar House testimony, "and will almost certainly fall at least another 10 to 15 percent before hitting bottom." He projected in an e-mail that prices will fall 10 percent below long-term trend levels by late this year or early in 2010. The road back, he warned, will take a long time. Home prices "might get back to 2007 levels in around 15 to 20 years, if we assume that inflation averages 3 percent." As a result, he testified, baby boomers will be like newlyweds, at least in terms of their homes:

Instead of having a home largely paid off by the time they reach their retirement years, many baby boomers will be in the same situation as first-time home buyers, looking at large mortgages requiring decades to pay down. Furthermore, the loss of equity in their current homes will make it far more difficult for baby boomers to move into homes that may be more suitable for their needs in retirement. Millions of middle-class baby boomers will find it difficult to raise the money needed to make a down payment on a new home.

A recent CEPR study found that the impact of lower home prices was especially severe for lower-wealth households. Depending on the size of future home-price declines, the study said, "up to 63 to 82 percent of homeowners in the bottom quintile [of wealth] in 2009 may be underwater in their mortgages, compared to 16 percent in 2004. Homeowners in the middle quintile fare better by this measure—we project 28-39 percent of those households aged 55-64 to be at risk in 2009, compared to three percent in 2004."

The housing bubble inflicted another cruel blow to homeowners, Baker says. Home prices increased so much that people felt they didn't need to stick with their traditional savings plans. As a result, "tens of millions of families opted not to save during what would typically be their peak saving years." Now they are approaching retirement with little except Social Security and Medicare to support them.

Well Said!

Maybe if you live in NY you could buy for 50K in the 70's and see 350K in 2006....but that isn't true for a large percentage of the rest of Americans. Retirees who will suffer the lost of their hard earned equity for retirement live in family suburbs throughout the U.S. Additionally, I don't know many retired persons who stay in their homes till they die so they can leave it all to their children!? These "old people" have paid their kids lifetime expenses, taken out loans to help with tuition, covered wedding costs, donated furniture, given their time to help with home improvements, co-signed for cars or down payments on a first home for their offsprings. Not to mention the hours of free babysitting ....etc...etc. And the reward? The attitude of their well educated offspring in scoffing at their parents last means to retire with some dignity. Be careful there...it will the "young" people who are going to be required to PAY-UP when their parents have to be on government assistance in order to keep a roof over their heads. Or maybe you won't mind to have them move in with you? hummmmm? None of us deserved this. Least of all the generation that KNEW how to live within their means. Those days are gone for sure.

KR of MI @ Mar 10, 2009 22:08:08 PM

Hmmm...

Not sure about this whole analysis. I don't see how housing has affected the 55+ set more than the rest of us. If you bought your house in 1970 for 50K...worth $150K 1n 1998...worth 350K in 2006 and worth 250K in 2008...you're not doing so bad. I can think of many demographics worse off due to the housing bubble...those who had to delay buying (and pay rent) for 5-10 years because values were hyper-inflated...those who bought less of a house than they should have been able to afford...

The 401K is a different issue and I do feel badly for people who have worked a lifetime to have it diminished at the last second, but as long as you were properly diversified and had enough for the next 10yrs in a safe vehicle, they too should be ok.

I hate to sound so harsh, but it really does serve as a good lesson to the rest of us...the market IS risky...DON'T FORGET IT!!!!

Mark of NY @ Mar 10, 2009 19:40:36 PM

Right On

This article made so many good points that must surface if there is to be any progress in unlocking the housing/consumer market. A large segment of consumers are in a state of financial shock, similar to what our parents experienced in the Great Depression. This could cause a permanent shift in the consumer spending paradigm, depending on how long this "recession" lasts. People who have lost 30% off the value of their home and retirement account are not going to feel down in the dumps for a few months and then go back to spending and making the same kinds of financial decisions they did previously. Until the administration understands the impact on the *psyche* of the middle class, particularly the Boomers, and addresses that with *emotionally meaningful* tax relief, forget about propping up the real economy. "Inside the Psyche of the Former Consumer" - http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1536333/the_rational_misers_inside_the_psyche.html?cat=9

kellysull of NC @ Mar 10, 2009 19:12:16 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

The Best Life

The Best Life

Contributing editor Philip Moeller writes about the people, ideas and programs that provide "best life" retirement solutions and opportunities.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!