Risky Business

The Often-Overlooked Truth About Immigration

By Matthew Bandyk

Posted: September 9, 2008

Everyone wants to be on the side of the small-business person—and to make the opposition look as if it is against the average entrepreneur. Barack Obama said in his DNC speech that "we measure the strength of our economy...by whether someone with a good idea can take a risk and start a new business." Then John McCain said in his nominating speech that Obama's economic plan "would force small businesses to cut jobs."

But wait a minute—there's actually a policy that promotes more entrepreneurial innovation than anything either candidate talked about in their speeches. What's more, it's actually a bipartisan issue!

A new paper from the NBER, written by Jennifer Hunt of McGill and Marjolaine Gauthier-Loiselle of Princeton, takes a comprehensive look at how immigrants are disproportionately greater contributors to technological innovation than native-born Americans. Here's a summary of the results:

These data imply that a one percentage point rise in the share of immigrant college graduates in the population increases patents per capita by 6%. This could be an overestimate of immigration's benefit if immigrant inventors crowd out native inventors, or an underestimate if immigrants have positive spill-overs on inventors. Using a 1950-2000 state panel, we show that natives are not crowded out by immigrants, and that immigrants do have positive spill-overs, resulting in an increase in patents per capita of about 15% in response to a one percentage point increase in immigrant college graduates.

It's true that most of the immigrants contributing so much to innovation are coming from the worlds of science and engineering, not business. But someone has to commercialize a patented technology, so the more patents coming out of the United States, the better for American entrepreneurs. It's funny (and somewhat disturbing) that many people in the United States see immigration as an issue about foreign competitors taking jobs from Americans. This study suggests that's backward. If we want to keep job-creating innovation in the United States, we should let in as many foreigners as we can.

Both Obama and McCain have supported pro-immigrant policies, especially for highly skilled immigrants. Let's hope that whoever takes office will work to convince Americans that immigration is a job creator, not a job killer.

Illegal Immigrants Do Compete Directly With US Workers

Andrew of CA - I am gratified to see an Illegal Immigrant supporter actually pays attention to the BLS Unemployment reports! I hate to do it but I have to say that you are not looking at ALL the data before blowing off the effect that Illegal Immigrants have on the U.S. Worker. Try consulting chart 26 at ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/lf/aat26.txt or other similar charts and comparing the data to the Pew Center Data that tells where Illegal Immigrants are working and you will see that the vast majority of the unemployed are in the same industries as are Illegal Immigrants. So to claim that "Jobs are not exchangeable and a simple comparison of employed illegal immigrants and unemployed Americans is almost irrelevant" does not hold up when one looks at the detailed statistics. In fact, the data clearly states that Illegal Immigrants directly compete with the majority of our unemployed for jobs. And it is only those who want to keep using that hackneyed line "Illegal Immigrants take jobs that Americans will not do" that refuse to see the facts.

Norski of MN @ Sep 12, 2008 20:59:51 PM

^ agreed (with Native American and Cato)

I should have made this clearer. I think the US immigration law needs to be changed to reflect the way people live their lives as Hernando de Soto recommends.

And Norski, I don't think there's much substance to your comment that "... if the Illegal Immigrant were not working, a U.S. Citizen would be." Jobs are not exchangeable, and a simple comparison of the number of employed legal immigrants and unemployed Americans is almost irrelevant. By your logic you could also argue that 16-19 year olds are displacing adult workers, since (for whites for instance) there are 4.6 million young workers employed and there are 5.8 million adult workers unemployed (source: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t02.htm). So we should probably not allow young Americans to hold jobs either right? Comparing these numbers for any two groups is a meaningless exercise.

Andrew of CA @ Sep 12, 2008 13:53:46 PM

^ agreed

How can we truly have free trade until we have free trade in labor? With the proper worker protections in place we could allow people to come and go legally in order to meet the needs of a rapidly shifting and dynamic economy. We long ago tore down the barriers to the free flow of capital across borders so why not for labor?

And Luther, we still lead the world in technological innovation (for now). Just because high tech goods aren't produced here doesn't mean those ideas weren't generated here. You seem to be missing the point.

Andrew of CA @ Sep 12, 2008 13:11:41 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Risky Business

Risky Business

Matt Bandyk, a reporter for U.S. News, explores capitalism from where it all begins, with the entrepreneur, whose risk taking and experimentation provide the roots from which the rest of the economy grows. As much courage as it takes to create one's own business, even the entrepreneur needs some help, and this blog will look at news, trends, and practical advice for starting and running a small business.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!