Planning to Retire

Older Worker Unemployment is Increasing Fast

By Emily Brandon

Posted: July 9, 2009

The unemployment rate for people age 55 and over rose from 6.7 percent in May to 7 percent in June. That’s still much lower than the 9.5 percent unemployment rate for the labor force as a whole. But unemployment among older workers grew faster in the past month than younger worker job loss. While unemployment among those under age 55 grew by just 1 percent between May and June, the number of age 55 and older unemployed grew by 4.4 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Older workers also have a tougher time finding new jobs once they become unemployed. The average duration of unemployment for those age 55 and older in June was 29.9 weeks, over 2 weeks longer than in May. Younger workers were typically unemployed for 21.4 weeks in June, a decline of just over a week since the previous month. About 38 percent of the older workers and 26 percent of the younger workers had been out of work for 27 or more weeks in June.

The good news: Many older workers are able to find jobs. While the total number of employed people in the workforce has fallen by nearly 6.1 million, or 4.2 percent, since the recession began, there has been a 3.5 percent increase in people age 55 and older with jobs. Over 900,000 more older workers had jobs in June than at the start of the recession, according to an analysis by Sara Rix of the AARP Public Policy Institute. The number of people age 55 and older expressing interest in working longer has also increased since the recession began. “Perhaps some older workers would rather not be working but have put off retirement as a result of a decline in their retirement savings. Others are working because they are too young to retire and/or enjoy what they are doing or want to remain involved,” says Rix in her report. “Whatever the reason for remaining in the labor force, these workers are better off than they would be if their employment numbers moved in the same direction as those for their younger counterparts.”

Unemployment Numbers

Traditionally governmental numbers produced by the labor department have been altered from time to time to provide statistics that are both meaningless and unfounded in fact. When the numbers they play with statistically do not yield favorable results, then they change the criteria or basis for the data. One can look at the computational methods used circa 1970's, before Nixon resigned and unemployment was very high, and compare it to a new basis instituted circa 1990's.

Perhaps a more reasonable assessment or interpretation of the data can be found at http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/us-recession-true-unemployment-rate-already-at-20/

Comparisons of this time period with other timeframes of unemployment yield useless findings because of the methodology involved.

Sad to say, but unless modifications to the stats incorporate those that have been pushed off the roles for one reason or another, such as benefits running out, the current stats don't really provide an indication of the truth.

I have opened a twitter account that addresses unemployment. You can find it at twitter.com/WAStrnad.

Wayne Strnad of IL @ Jul 10, 2009 11:00:16 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Planning to Retire

Planning to Retire

Reporter Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!