Planning to Retire

No Social Security Increase in 2010

By Emily Brandon

Posted: October 15, 2009

Retirees will not receive a Social Security cost-of-living increase in 2010, the Social Security Administration announced today. This will be the first year without a boost in Social Security payments since automatic increases for inflation went into effect in 1975.

Social Security payments are currently tied to the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, which did not increase between the third quarter for 2008 and 2009. Existing Social Security recipients will receive the same amount as last year, under current law. “Last year when consumer prices spiked, largely as a result of higher gas prices, beneficiaries received a 5.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment, the largest increase since 1982,” says Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security. “Social Security is doing its job helping Americans maintain their standard of living.” The maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax will also remain at $106,800.

[See 6 Ways to Maximize Your Social Security Payout.]

To counteract the stagnant retirement benefits, President Obama announced his support for a one-time $250 payment for seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities yesterday. Under the proposal, checks would be mailed to 49 million Social Security beneficiaries, 5 million Supplemental Security Income recipients, 2 million veterans, 500 thousand railroad retirement and disability beneficiaries, and about 1 million public-employee retirees. The amount is equivalent to a 2 percent increase in benefits for the average Social Security recipient and would cost $13 billion. Only one payment would be allowed per person.

The measure would extend for an additional year a provision of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act which distributed $250 economic recovery payments to seniors in May 2009 at a cost of $13.7 billion. “These payments will provide aid to more than 50 million people in the coming year, relief that will not only make a difference for them, but for our economy as a whole, complementing the tax cuts we’ve provided working families and small businesses through the Recovery Act," says Obama in a statement. "This additional assistance will be especially important in the coming months, as countless seniors and others have seen their retirement accounts and home values decline as a result of this economic crisis.” Obama's proposal is similar to several bills currently being considered by Congress.

[See New Bills Aim to Boost Social Security Checks.]

The earnings limit for Social Security recipients who are younger than their full retirement age (age 66 for people born in 1943 through 1954) will remain $14,160 in 2010. After that amount, 50 cents of each dollar earned is temporarily withheld from Social Security checks. For Social Security recipients turning 66 in 2010, the earnings cap is raised to $37,680 between January and the month the worker turns 66. Workers who earn more than that will have 33 cents of each dollar temporarily deducted from Social Security payments. Once beneficiaries reach their full retirement age there are no penalties for continuing to work while claiming Social Security. Employees who had some or all of their Social Security payments withheld due to earnings may have their benefits recalculated to a higher amount when they reach their full retirement age to reflect their increased lifetime earnings.

Revise the earnings limit

The earings limit for those deciding to take their benefits early is a penalty that needs to be changed to reflect what is going on in this country today. Many people at 62-65 are opting for early social security beneftis simply to get a paycheck. This age group has found themselves downsized, layed-off or simply eliminated. Many have gone on to find other work but at much lower salaries than they were earning. With the hit on home prices and 401ks, we don't have the luxury of somply retiring on our Social security. Since they are already taking a hit with a lower benefit, why do we have to penalize them twice by limiting how much they can earn? If a 64 year old for instance finds a job for 30,000 a year, he or she is penalized and has to give back 8,000. With the max early retirement payment of about 1400/mo (16,800/yr.) the 30,000/ a yr job nets 24,800. If we let that individual work and earn the 30,000 in addition to his reduced SS benefit, he would earn 16, 800 plus the 30,000 for a yearly total of 46,800. If the administration cannot make a permanent change then how about a one or two year moratorium on the earnings cap until we get out of this horrible economic mess?

Rick of NH @ Jan 23, 2010 11:57:34 AM

Idiotic

It makes no sense to me not to give seniors and disabled individuals an increase in their benefit each and every year regardless of economy. The cost of living has increased regardless if the govenment has seen it or not and I am positive they have. The cost of gas to run your car increases all the time but we do not get an increase in our benefits to cover gas to run our vehicles to go to the store or to the doctors or just to have something availalbe to run emregency's or go visit our relatives. Heating oil has increased to heat our homes but it seems that does not matter to our governement, we just freeze because we can't afford to heat our homes without an increase to cover the heating bill. Electic is going to sky rocket and we need an increase to cover the electric bill but it seems our government doesn't consider that important enough to give us a increase in our benefits so we can survive using our electric appliances and have light at night. We just can't go to work and work over time to make the extra money we need to pay the increased bills that have been tossed to us or work over time to pay for the groceries we need to survive since everything has increased in the food industry. Clothing has increased but dowe get an increase inour benefits to buy clothing, absolutely not because according toour government we do not need a increase for clothing ....... I really do not think that our government understands our daily needs when we retire and have only our retirement to live on. For that matter people who have become disabled and on a fixed disability income do not have any change at all to make extra money working over time to pay the increased cost of living and especially those who have been forced to retire early due to injury and being put on disability incomes do not have a chance at earning extra money to pay bills. Not allowing us who are retired or on a disability income we did not want to gain extra income thru a yearly cost

of @ Jan 10, 2010 21:56:57 PM

Wait a minute

No one's messing up the country. We'll get out of this mess, just like we have always. Set back and take a 'Chill Pill'. Stick with the leadership.

JAMES WILLIAMS of PA @ Jan 10, 2010 13:15:44 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Planning to Retire

Planning to Retire

Reporter Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!