Planning to Retire

Employee Misperceptions About Target-Date Funds

By Emily Brandon

Posted: May 7, 2009

Target-date funds are often marketed as fix-it-and-forget-it funds for people who know little about asset allocation. They typically provide a mix of investments including stocks, bonds, and cash that grow more conservative as you approach a retirement date of your own choosing. New employees are often automatically enrolled in target-date funds if they don’t specifically opt out. In fact, the most popular default investment option for 401(k)s is currently target-date funds, which 53 percent of 401(k) plans used in 2008, up from 35 percent in 2007, according to the consulting firm Greenwich Associates.

But a new survey indicates that target-date funds, and especially their risks, are poorly understood by investors. A recent online survey by consulting firm Behavioral Research Associates and asset management company Envestnet found that only 16 percent of participants said they had ever heard of target-date funds prior to reading the description. The 251 employed individuals between ages 25 and 70 in this admittedly small survey were then shown a description of target-date funds using a composite of actual promotional material from three leading providers of target-date funds. After viewing the material the participations were shown as series of statements about target-date funds and asked to agree or disagree. Here is how many participants agreed with each statement.

Source: Behavioral Research Associates and Envestnet, 2009.

For the record, none of these statements is completely true and many are downright false. Additionally, about 57 percent of the participants thought there was no or a low chance that money in a target-date fund could be lost over a 10-year period. But retirement savers can and did lose money in target-date funds in the past year. It remains to be seen if those losses will be recouped within the decade.

And while it’s true that target-date funds do grow more conservative over time, asset allocation varies wildly among different funds. The percent of the fund allocated to equities for employees 10 years from retirement varied from 40 percent to 80 percent among target-date funds in 2006, according to an analysis by consulting firm Watson Wyatt. On a worker’s designated retirement day, equity allocations ranged from 20 percent to 65 percent. Individual investors should make sure that target-date funds offered by an employer carry a level of risk they are comfortable taking on.

Why are there misperceptions?

There is a flood of concern about target date funds flowing through the press. The noise is so loud that the Department of Labor and the SEC are going to hold a joint hearing on them in June.

But WHY are there misperceptions?

The answer is simple: Lack of education. Who educates Americans on money or savings, let alone investing? Learning how to handle money should be as much a part of our educational curriculum as sex education -- after all, most of us can't live without either. Yet, how many schools offer financial literacy courses?

Target date funds are an asset allocation tool for savers. They are better than most traditional choices made by retirement plan participants -- most of whom either don't choose or make terrible decisions. Too many plan participants retain their contributions in cash or cash equivalents and don't benefit from investments that keep pace with inflation and achieve a reasonable rate of return (the "savers"). Too many other plan participants -- the "amateur investors" -- retain their contributions concentrated in company stock or in high risk non-diversified investments inappropriate for retirement assets. Target date funds offer a middle ground -- even if imperfect.

Most inquiries into the misperceptions of target date funds are aimed at the symptom -- not the cause. Your post reflects the real issue - lack of investing knowledge. But, convincing Americans to take charge of their financial health is about as easy -- and as successful -- as convincing them to take charge of their physical health. That is why efforts by Congress and regulators to correct this by piling on more written disclosure to an already overwhelmed (and apathetic) participant population is just NOT the answer.

The solution is education - both early and often. For adult plan participants, companies can begin by requiring attendance at educational seminars where individual financial profiles are completed. Regular, mandatory follow-up meetings to reinforce participants knowledge and choices should be the norm. For our young people, courses that teach about money, credit, saving and investing must become a fundamental part of our educational process.

The goal must be financial literacy for all. Only proactive education will produce a more informed and more well prepared group of retirees.

Joan Bozek of CT @ May 16, 2009 19:15:52 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Planning to Retire

Planning to Retire

Reporter Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!