Planning to Retire

Kodak Retirees Protest Benefit Cuts

By Emily Brandon

Posted: October 15, 2008

Companies don't always deliver on the retirement benefits promised to their employees. Kodak announced in August that it would no longer pay for dental coverage or life insurance for retirees beginning in 2009. The camera company also plans to shift more health insurance premium costs to retirees and phase out employer-paid medical coverage for dependents over the next 10 years.

The retired Kodak workers decided to stage a protest. About 70 retirees picketed outside the company's corporate headquarters last week to protest the cuts, the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle reports. Rochester-based TV station R News captured a video of the former workers marching with signs lamenting the loss of their promised benefits. More than 200 Kodak retirees held a similar protest outside Kodak Tower in September.

Kodak spent $44 million on postretirement benefits in the second quarter of 2008, according to an earnings report filed in July with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the company expects to spend an additional $112 million this year. "We feel that our approach strikes the right balance between individual and company interests," Kodak said in a statement about the benefit cuts. "Keeping Kodak competitive is the best thing we can do for employees and retirees."

olden paras---!

thats where your money went to pay out bridge payments, paid health insurence to 1991 retirees, those after get the shaft, twice.

kodak mad of NY @ Nov 04, 2009 15:11:00 PM

Retired Kodak Person

After 34 years with Kndak I was forced to retire. The people running Kodak had changed to the point I could no longer stand it. Now they tell me my insurance will be going from $345.69 a Mo. to $1113.92 a Mo. This is just one more way of getting rid of the old folks. Sort of like Wasington.

Les of CO @ Oct 31, 2009 14:23:33 PM

iEastman Kodak company

I would like to start off with, is Kodak better off in 2009 by cutting it's retirees and dependents Health care and Life Insurance. My answer is no. Kodak along with many Americans companies got greedy and not sticking to what they do best. Buying companies they should have stayed away from. Kodak not being agressive like they did in the 60's 70's and 80's. Retireing older employess who had a handle on make quality products, not just putting out products with the Kodak name, thinking as in the past the Kodak name would sale Kodak products with low quality and problems. Kodak top Mmanagement and Middle Managementr stop listing to their field people who tried to tell them our customer basic is changing. We need to get back to the basic of taking care of out customers better than Fuji.

Now a large number of Kodak retires are pist off with Kodak cutting or doing away with some of the benfits. many of these retiress are not buying Kodak products as a result of the benifit downsizing. Many have to shift their dollards to help pay for life insurance and the increase in their medical premiums.

Ismar Jones of NY @ Jul 28, 2009 15:42:18 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Planning to Retire

Planning to Retire

Reporter Emily Brandon tells you how to get ready financially for retirement and to make your golden years the best they can be.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!