On Careers

Whose Side is HR on, Anyway?

By Suzanne Lucas

Posted: June 25, 2009

I received an inaccurate performance appraisal from my incompetent manager and I wrote a detailed response (actually, longer than the original appraisal). I have some questions:

  • Is it likely that the company will change the review rating?
  • How does HR feel about employees who submit review responses?
  • Even if the ratings are not changed, will the fact that I wrote a coherent, objective response be noted in my manager's HR file?
  • My husband is a manager at a big company. He tells me HR is not my friend, that that they will protect my manager before me. Is this true?

I don’t know you, your manager, or your company policies, so this is going to be a general answer--your mileage may vary.

Changing the rating: It’s likely that your company has a formal review process. Just writing a response will not get a rating changed. You’ll have to officially request a review and a hearing. Will it get changed? I’ve seen it happen, but more often then not, the answer is no. Employees are often the worst judges of their own behavior. I’ve never had an employee say, “Gee, I’m average or below average.” Every employee thinks they are above average. This, of course, cannot be true.

Your manager may or may not be incompetent. I can’t judge from here. If he is incompetent, his manager should already know it. Your manager’s manager is the person you really need to speak to about this. And please note, I said speak. Almost everyone is too busy to read through comments on a performance review. Make an appointment and express your concerns.

HR’s feelings: HR doesn’t really feel anything. We’ve all grown numb to the whining. (Sorry, I’ve just divulged a little secret.) Responses are frequent and we take them with a grain of salt. That said, we are not the final arbiters of performance. (Or at least we shouldn’t be.) We are there to help your management make proper decisions. But a rating is a business decision and--except in rare circumstances--the business (line management) should be making appraisal decisions.

Your manager’s file: Unless your manager has done something illegal, or is already on a performance improvement plan, I can’t see that happening. Performance appraisals tend to be subjective and managers should have the ability to evaluate their own employees.

HR as your friend: I’m quite friendly and have bent over backwards to help employees with various problems. But, what your husband said has a grain of truth to it. HR is there to help the business. Theoretically, (and in my experience and opinion, practically) that means making sure the people are taken care of. Good people make good business, and you want to keep the best people. That said, will they favor a manager over the employee? It depends on what is best for the business. As I said before, none of us are great at judging our own performance. As a result, the bias almost always favors the manager in these cases. Your arguments need to be solid, fact-based, and concisely written.

One of the best rebuttals to a performance appraisal I’ve seen involved an excel spreadsheet. The employee had several columns: a quote from the appraisal, documented evidence rebutting the manager’s statement, names of other employees who could verify, and finally the employee’s own view of what happened. It was easy to read, displayed evidence clearly, and went a long way in helping the employee win his case.

Will this do any good for you? Maybe--and maybe not. If you don’t see eye to eye with your manager, you can choose to make the changes to comply with his wishes, be miserable, or look for a new job. There are good reasons for all three choices. Just be sure to make a conscious choice, and don’t just drift along.

Suzanne Lucas has nine years of human resources experience, most of which have been in a Fortune 500-company setting. She holds a Professional in Human Resources Certificate from the Society for Human Resources Management. She blogs at Evil HR Lady.

Two Different Viewpoints

This is a great topic. I'm sorry to hear about your dilemma with the unfavorable performance appraisal. I don't remember where I found this statement, but it basically said that an employee's purpose is to "take the monkey" off of her boss' back. An employee is there to minimize her boss' headaches - a walking solution to the boss' problems.

Prior to reading this, I always thought that I was just there to work hard and get results because that's what the company was paying me to do. This is true, but the "company" is too broad – it’s your boss that you really work for. When I figured out that I'm there to be a part of the solution (for my boss), you wouldn't believe the perks I received.

Perhaps your boss simply has different objectives, work style, work ethic, etc. than you. Is it possible to take an objective look at your manager's comments and perhaps see things from his/her view? I know it's tough...but when you initially get past the reactions and defense mechanisms, there could be an opportunity for growth. At the very least, the growth could be to simply understand and accept someone else’s opinion about you even if you disagree.

However, based on the current economy, the poor performance appraisal could be a prelude to a layoff. I know this sounds really negative, but I know of a local company that gave low appraisals to several employees (who were previously rated satisfactorily) to have documentation to justify laying them off. Be careful and pay attention to clues as this could be another possibility.

Good for you for writing your rebuttal comments on how you disagree with the appraisal, and always keep copies for future reference (along with previous years’ appraisals for comparison).

Good luck.

D. Robinson

www.careercougar.com

Careercougar.wordpress.com

Daphne of CT @ Jun 26, 2009 16:29:56 PM

HR's Problem

Suzanne,

An interesting and thought-provoking column. My take: HR should not be regarding employee responses as whining but should be acting in as objective a manner as possible. There are plenty of terrible supervisors out there who are known to HR and yet nothing is done to correct or terminate them. That is not to HR's credit.

I would not regard any internal complaint mechanism that carries an inherent bias in favor of the manager as being a credible complaint mechanism.

Thanks for surfacing this topic. It deserves a lot of discussion.

Michael Wade of AZ @ Jun 26, 2009 10:33:40 AM

excellent, as always

This column is a good example of why Suzanne rocks and why her blog (Evil HR Lady) is some of the best reading you can find on the topic.

Ask a Manager / Alison Green of DC @ Jun 25, 2009 18:50:33 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

On Careers

On Careers

Find savvy job advice from the brains behind top careers blogs, including Jobacle, Ask a Manager, What Would Dad Say, Newly Corporate, Cheezhead, Evil HR Lady, The M.A.P. Maker and Execupundit.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!