New Money

The Oscars, Recession-Style

By Katy Marquardt

Posted: February 23, 2009

On today's Good Morning America, anchor Robin Roberts described this year's Oscar glitz as "toned down." Apparently, stars and designers had to make some tough decisions. Notes the Los Angeles Times, "It's a delicate balance to strike in a town not known for its restraint."

And let's not forget the viewers.  InStyle magazine's fashion director told the LA Times (pre-Oscars), "Would you really want to tune in and see a bunch of women walking down the red carpet in black pantsuits?" he said. "It's a recession, not an apocalypse." The horror! The stars didn't disappoint last night, but they did acknowledge the recession in their own little ways:

-Accessories designer Stuart Weitzman, who usually adorns a lucky actress with $1 million shoes, decided it wasn't appropriate.

-Stars opted for "statement" pieces over going the head-to-toe diamond route.

-Vanity Fair went for a more "intimate" location for its annual party, and used decorations from past years' events.

But apparently Wolfgang Puck didn't get the memo. His menu for the Governor's Ball included 3,000 Oscars statues made out of smoked salmon and 6,000 made of chocolate. He told reporters it was essential to do it up and support Obama's stimulus plan.

One of the night's great lines came from host Hugh Jackman, who's also the star of the "Australia." He quipped: "“Because of the recession, everything is being downsized. Next year I’ll be starring in a movie called ‘New Zealand."

Re: Larry of CA -- Presumably You Care

...since you're reading an article about the Oscars and have bothered to post a comment about it.

Yes, the Oscars are very self-congratulatory, but I've never bought that as an argument against it; nearly every industry has its honors and parties and conventions.

As for the attendees spending their money on leftwing causes -- uh, most of them DO. All the celebrities you saw last night do indeed have long lists of charitable donations.

Apparently in your world, winning an award and donating to charity are somehow mutually exclusive.

Michael Dance of VA @ Feb 23, 2009 13:32:20 PM

Who cares about the Oscars?

The world watches the mental midgets of Hollywood get together to celebrate themselves.

How about they spend THEIR money on the leftwing causes that they promote, instead of blowing smoke up each other’s butts?

But that wouldn't Hollywood now would it?

Larry of CA @ Feb 23, 2009 11:13:29 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

New Money

Katy Marquardt, a senior editor at U.S.News & World Report, takes a contemporary look at happenings in the financial world and aims to help young investors get going with their portfolios--or just sound cool at cocktail parties. Have a question? E-mail Katy at newmoney@usnews.com

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!