New Money

Wells Fargo Deal: Better for Wachovia Shareholders

By U.S. News Staff

Posted: October 3, 2008

Under the Citigroup takeover, Wachovia shareholders would have gotten a pretty raw deal. The Wells Fargo acquisition (read the full text here) is an improvement: Each share of Wachovia common stock will be exchanged for 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo common stock, which comes to a value of $7 per share (based on Wells Fargo's closing stock price of $35.16 a share on Thursday). The Citi deal would have paid $1 per share.

Here's what Wells Fargo's chairman, Richard Kovacevich, said in a statement: "This agreement is an outstanding opportunity for Wachovia common and preferred shareholders and debt holders, team members and customers, for the Charlotte and St. Louis communities and indeed all of the communities that Wachovia serves, and for the U.S. government and our banking system."

According to the Winston-Salem Journal, some shareholders are considering individual or class-action lawsuits based on statements made by Wachovia executives this year. One such is former CEO Ken Thompson's decree in January that Wachovia was not going to cut its dividend. Since then, the bank has cut its dividend twice, from 64 cents in February to 5 cents in July. One investor in the story, who has lost roughly $150,000 on Wachovia shares over the past year, said: "I bought 2,000 shares of Wachovia stock at $36 a share based on that statement because it helped restore my confidence in a Wachovia rebound."

<quote>As a Citi shareholder, and having increased my position substantially this week as a result of this deal, I can only say that if the Wells/Wachovia deal goes through I will immediately close all of my accounts at both banks and will never do business with either of them again. <end quote>

You Greedy SOB! you don't care about anything except money. You're as bad as the greedy, whining Citi Group.

Citi:

O WHAH.. we can't earn money cuz we're stupid, bail us out, government, o wait.. here's an idea... lets be underhanded, and get government aid by buying up a piece of a failing company to get more $$$.

You:

O WHAH... I saw somebody doing something shady and it looked like i was going to get rich if i tried to get something for nothing, but it's failing, so i'm going to take my marbles and go home...

John of NC @ Oct 09, 2008 09:08:28 AM

wachovia shares

As a Wachovia shareholder, I will vote for the Wells Fargo Deal.

Not just because it is a better deal for my portfolio but because the taxpayers (myself) will not be on the hook for millions of citigroup losses.

John Little of NC @ Oct 05, 2008 01:05:09 AM

Wells Fargo & Wachovia

With the Wells Fargo & Wachovia merger Wells fargo is taking all of Wachovia and no goverment aid. With Citigroup they were taking only parts of Wachovia and the government was going to bail them out. That is the only reason Citigroup wanted Wachovia for the bail out.

of PA @ Oct 04, 2008 21:00:35 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

New Money

Katy Marquardt, a senior editor at U.S.News & World Report, takes a contemporary look at happenings in the financial world and aims to help young investors get going with their portfolios--or just sound cool at cocktail parties. Have a question? E-mail Katy at newmoney@usnews.com

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!