Fresh Greens

Obama Announces New Emissions and Mileage Standards

By Maura Judkis

Posted: May 19, 2009

President Obama announced new emissions and mileage standards today, pushing the average car to 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016 - a 40 percent cleaner fleet of vehicles on our roads. The plan is based on the stricter auto standards that California has sought under federal clean air laws.

So how big of a deal is this? In today's remarks, Obama stated that the move will save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the cars' lifetime. This is equivalent to:

Said Obama: "Right now the rules governing fuel economy in this country are inadequate, uncertain and in flux. ... The goal is to set one national fuel standard."

The changes are welcomed by both environmentalists and auto industry officials in what the New York Times described as nearly a win-win:

Environmental advocates and industry officials welcomed the new program, but for different reasons. Environmentalists called it a long-overdue tightening of emissions and fuel economy standards after decades of government delay and industry opposition. Auto industry officials said it would provide the single national efficiency standard they have long desired, a reasonable timetable to meet it and the certainty they need to proceed with product development plans.

Though the more fuel efficient cars will cost consumers more - an estimated $1,300 - Obama said that the driver would save over $2,800 over the life of the vehicle, and the cars would pay for themselves in fuel costs in just three years.

Said the Wall Street Journal:

That’s true—though the payback will depend on the price of gasoline. A driver trading up from an average fuel-efficient car today to a 39 miles-per-gallon car in 2016 who drives 12,000 miles a year would save about $384 a year with $3 gasoline. That would take just over 3 years to pay off the new car’s higher price.

If gas returns to $4 a gallon, the savings are bigger and the payback is quicker: $512 in gas savings over the course of a year, which means the extra price would be paid off in just two and a half years.

The new standards will bring about a small-car boom. Proclaims Jim Motavalli of the Daily Green: "The age of the SUV is over."

 

Reply to Fred Moolten of PA,

A Comprehensive CO2-mitigation program isn't needed. In 1988 James Hansen testified before congress to scare us about global warming. See his predictions on page 7 of this PDF from NASA’s website:

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1988/1988_Hansen_etal.pdf

All satellite data, including this from the University of Alabama at Huntsville proves that he was wrong. The predicted warming never occurred:

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/HANSEN_AND_CONGRESS.jpg

2008 was even colder than 1988. Now the politicians are threatening to burden the economy with their Cap-and-Trade tax increase on all conventional energy usage, to be paid for by you every time you buy something manufactured or transported using energy, which includes everything. They claim to be protecting the children, when they are really making plans to subject these children to a poorer future with these taxes, before they are old enough or wise enough to vote against it. Here is more background on Hansen’s hoax from 1988:

http://icecap.us/index.php/go/joes-blog/hansens_anniversary_testimony/

31,478 scientists signed a petition opposing the man-made global warming theory. Their reasoning is outlined in a peer reviewed journal article detailing the evidence that disproved the theory. Please follow this link:

http://www.petitionproject.org/

All of the so-called ‘alternative’ sources of energy, including wind and solar, equal less than one percent of mankind’s current needs. That’s no alternative. Meanwhile our far more economical access to hydrocarbon energy and nuclear energy is being throttled for no good reason. Gore wouldn't mind impoverishing the rest of us to enrich himself with his ‘carbon trading’ scheme. With the size of his utility bills and the cost of jet fuel for his private jet flying him all over the world, he needs all the money he can get. If he were really worried about CO2, wouldn’t he act like he was worried about his own emissions, and energy consumption? Of course he is received like a hero in Hollywood; he makes hypocrisy fashionable.

This is all being sold to us as if it were ‘scientific’, when really it is an attack on science, an attack on our scientific institutions, an attack on scientists themselves, and an attack on our modern standard of living given to us by previous achievements in science. Here are examples:

http://www.opinioneditorials.com/guestcontributors/msheppard_20060630.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1545134/Scientists-threatened-for-climate-denial.html

The petition project provides a list of names of 31,478 brave scientists courageous enough to go on record opposing the man-made global warming theory, even though they must know it is sure to be used as a ‘blacklist’ to exclude them from consideration for advancement, or grant funding, wherever their institutions still adhere to the politically correct, but scientifically incorrect position on this theory.

Barry of CA @ Jun 05, 2009 18:21:32 PM

Rural America Ruined

Obama just made rural life in America nearly fatal by the year 2016. Vehicle costs will now go up and get ready for fuel prices to hit the roof by 2016. Long commutes in rural parts of America will cost a dang fortune. I know because I saw what EPA's tier I and tier II regulations did to gas prices. Get ready to import our food and produce because farmers will not be able to afford equipment, fuel, & transportation of goods. Long distance travel will no longer be possible without travelling the sky or rail, which isn't handy for people living in rural areas. Good bye America as I know it and hello ObamaNation! Thanks Mr. President for doing your best to ruin our beloved country by making us live to your standards! We have a president with a God Complex. What's next on your agenda? I need to know if I need to go buy something while I can still afford it.

MadScientist of AR @ May 20, 2009 11:31:25 AM

New CAFE standards

Put in perspective, the new mileage standards should probably be seen as a small step forward, but by themselves will reduce CO2 emissions less than needed for a comprehensive CO2-mitigation program. However, an encouraging additional development is the announcement of planned major upgrades in the nation's electricity grid, which will expedite the use of electric power for automobiles. Electricity is a far more efficient power source than the internal combustion engine, and the combination of an improved grid with the substitution of wind and solar energy for coal in generating most future electricity will go further than mileage standards alone to control carbon emissions at a level that contains future climate change and its consequences within tolerable limits.

The issue of costs is not irrelevant, but the Administration has appropriately decided that energy independence and climate change mitigation deserve priority. Higher automobile purchase costs are anticipated, but will be offset by lower fuel expenses. It's also important to note that the new standards are averages, and do not preclude the purchase of cars, SUVs, or trucks that deviate from the average in the case of individuals or families who require such vehicles.

Fred Moolten of PA @ May 19, 2009 13:49:19 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Fresh Greens

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!