Fresh Greens

The Myth of the Green Cigarette

By Maura Judkis

Posted: July 28, 2009

Cigarettes are the most-polluted item in the world, so needless to say, smoking is not very green. Considering that only 10 percent of cigarettes are disposed of properly, any effort to reduce the amount of waste caused by smokers is a good thing, right? That's the thinking behind makers of several brands of e-cigarettes - a trendy new smoking alternative that dispenses nicotine through vapor, rather than smoke, in a reusable, odorless cigarette-like device. E-cigarette users can "smoke" indoors without affecting others. They never need a lighter, and prevent hundreds of butts from being stubbed out on the pavement, since the device uses rechargeable batteries and refillable cartridges.

Totally green smoking is too good to be true. Turns out, the electronic smokes - which are marketed on several websites as healthier than real cigarettes - can be as harmful as traditional kind. According to an FDA press release

Because these products have not been submitted to the FDA for evaluation or approval, at this time the agency has no way of knowing, except for the limited testing it has performed, the levels of nicotine or the amounts or kinds of other chemicals that the various brands of these products deliver to the user.

The FDA’s Division of Pharmaceutical Analysis analyzed the ingredients in a small sample of cartridges from two leading brands of electronic cigarettes. In one sample, the FDA’s analyses detected diethylene glycol, a chemical used in antifreeze that is toxic to humans, and in several other samples, the FDA analyses detected carcinogens, including nitrosamines. These tests indicate that these products contained detectable levels of known carcinogens and toxic chemicals to which users could potentially be exposed.

The harmful chemicals aren't the only reason for the warning. “The FDA is concerned about the safety of these products and how they are marketed to the public,” said Margaret A. Hamburg, M.D., commissioner of food and drugs. The e-cigarettes are sold in malls, and the flavored nicotine may entice kids. They're also touted as "healthy," "green," and "environmental." But with the wallop of chemicals inside and the battery that will find its way to a landfill, environmentally-aware smokers are trading one bad habit for another.

Traditional cigarettes, too, will tout their green credentials. American Spirit brand uses USDA-certified organic tobacco, avoiding the pesticides that other growers use (tobacco farmers use 27 million pounds of pesticides each year). American Spirit is owned by Reynolds American, though, which diminishes its green cred.

So is there an eco-friendly way to smoke? In addition to the litter, Slate's Green Lantern urges you to consider the air pollution:

The global tobacco industry manufactures roughly 5.5 trillion cigarettes annually. Assuming that all those cancer sticks get consumed, smokers around the world spew out about 84,878 tons of fine particulate matter annually, or a little less than half of a year's worth of emissions from American on-road vehicles.

So to answer that question: no. Whether or not the well-being of the planet provides any additional motivation, it's time to quit for the sake of your own health. More on smoking here.

Leery of anything FDA related

I am somewhat leery of anything FDA related. Remember those folks who brought you saccharine and approved Nutrasweet. The jury is still out on that one, and I personally can't handle it. Any "cigarette" like product, they are going to be all over like white on rice because smoking got under somebody's butt, regardless of the cancer causing agents and public health issues, it became someone's personal quest to rid the world of fat people and smokers.

Anything that helps people quit smoking or not effect second-hand smoke on others, including not harming themselves, is a good thing. Duh, nicotine is addicting, but it is not the nicotine that kills.

Wallysmom of CT @ Oct 27, 2009 00:23:38 AM

Cigarettes and other Drug Plants, e.g., Poppy plant

I couldn't find any catagory to insert the following information which is very, very important: Poppy plants have flowers which require fertilization. Our scientists should be able, by selective breeding plant genotypes, to produce pollen that would change the Poppy plants yield of opium. When pollenation time comes around, this changed/mutated poppy pollen could be dusted over the poppy fields, thereby cutting back on the yield and perhaps even change the poppy plant so that it doesn't yield Opium. Just a thought and I am assuming that the Poppy plants have to be pollenated. Another approach is to kill all the bees in that area where the Poppy fields are.

If this could be done, it would be a boon for the world, besides removing the funding for the terrorist organizations. Please put this article somewhere if you don't think is appropiate for this section.

Robert L. Matarainen of NY @ Aug 12, 2009 14:35:50 PM

Sick of the ignorance

I am so tired of all these "reporters" reporting things they know nothing about and have obviously not done one bit of research on! Go GET the lab reports. ALL of the ones you can find. Ruyan has one, GreenSmoke has one, Totallywicked has one. READ them. What "wallop" of chemicals ARE you talking about? If I were these companies I would sue you all for slander. The handful of chemicals are the same exact ones in half the products on the shelves right now APPROVED by the FDA for human consumption. What are you doing!?

I hope you realize you've got the fear monger FDA fools laughing at your ignorance. They know all they have to do is say cancer and everyone runs screaming but if you just knew what you were talking about, they'd be sunk. Pay attention or quit writing.

Quit taking the word of our trusty government administrations and do your own investigation. Find out what is in your FOOD, your artificial sweeteners, your nicotrol inhalers. Lets see that list of the "wallop of chemicals." Go ahead. Post it for us all to see. Then post the quantities found in an e-cigarette and next to that, post the ingredients and quantities of the chemicals in the cigarette. Then you tell a smoker who FINALLY found a way to quit that he/she can't have them anymore and will have to go back to smoking because the smoking cessation devices are crap.

And while you're at it, pick up a copy of the Bill of Rights. When you get to the part about liberty, look that word up, too. And when you read where it says the government can't interfere with ANYTHING we do as long as it isn't harmful to others, then you get back on here and apologize for being an uninformed, anti-American "Mauron."

Karen of GA @ Aug 11, 2009 18:28:33 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Fresh Greens

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!