Fresh Greens

Bike Shares Stalled Across the Country

By Maura Judkis

Posted: July 2, 2008

Bad news for the bikeless: Hourly bike rental systems are being delayed in three U.S. cities because of various concerns.

Chicago residents won't see rental bikes until legal issues are resolved—the city must establish whether the biker, company, or city is legally liable for any injuries incurred while riding. Officials have not announced a time frame for the rollout of the bikes. In Portland, Ore., plans are stalled indefinitely while city officials study the pros and cons of similar programs in Paris, Rome, and New Zealand.

And here in Washington, Smartbike, which was originally planned for this spring, will be available to renters in August because of meter installation and maintenance issues. The hottest month of the year in D.C. is not an ideal time to roll out a bike-sharing program, when most people would prefer taking the Metro or the air-conditioned comfort of a cab. A similar program will be unveiled in nearby Arlington, Va., but not until 2009. The Arlington bikes will not be interchangeable with the D.C. system's bikes. All of the programs are based on the bike rental program in Paris, where people can pay a yearly membership fee for access to bikes at stations around the city for short periods of time. According to a Washington Post article that ran last spring, before the rental bikes were first introduced, a study analyzed trips through Paris by car, bike, and taxi, as well as on foot, and found that the bike was always the fastest. The bikes reportedly have alleviated congestion on the city's narrow streets.

Once systems have rolled out in U.S. cities, bike sharing will hit a few more snags. In cities where many people are used to driving or taking public transportation, and where bike lanes aren't prevalent, there may be accidents. Car drivers may not know to check their rear-view mirrors before opening their doors, which could cause serious accidents by making bikers swerve into the roads. Bikers who are new to city riding may not follow traffic laws, putting themselves in danger. On top of that, Smartbike and most other bike-sharing systems do not provide helmets to riders, for hygienic reasons.

The D.C. fleet will start small—only 120 bikes, compared with Paris's 10,000—so it will hardly be a formidable challenge to cars and public transport. Regardless, Chicago and Portland—and other cities looking to unclog roadways and green up their cities—will be basing their decisions on whether enough Washingtonians will hit the road in August with two wheels, instead of four.

bike share: go slow!

It is important that bike share programs go slowly.

There are many different ways that bicycling can become a culture in the U.S., and though bike-sharing may be the quickest (and easiest for bike advocates)... it may not be the best.

Bike sharing <<monetizes>> bicycling, turning every ride into a transaction involving a multinational media corporation, GPS, credit cards, IDs, satellites, transfer trucks, rental kiosks, and advertising--lots of it.

The principle behind bike-sharing is that in this consumer society--where people buy cars, houses, iPods, Gameboys, light-up sneakers, surfboards, and a million other expensive or bulky items--that bicycles are somehow incredibly difficult to obtain, or safeguard against theft, or maintain.

Of course, millions of cyclists all over the world, many in much less secure and poorer societies, manage to ride everywhere, every day.

But the bike share virus appeals so directly to the typical urban planner and the typical bike advocate--it's top-down, it's quick, it's uniform, and it doesn't call for a lot of work.

But bike sharing could create a "welfare" class of rider, one that never gets any skills, never rides an inch further than neccessary, and one that eventually becomes dependent.

At that point, look for the rate hikes, and other controls, just as the Internet is facing a lot of changes designed to make the maximum in cash, while eliminating choice.

Another more important aspect is whether bike sharing is really green -- consider that for every few trips by bike, a shuttle by truck will be needed to bring bikes back after they get scattered. Nearly all bike share programs are paid for by advertising billboards--many of which are video screens or illuminated panels. What about the energy these use?

Two more points, and these may be a bit deep -- what about the increased consumption linked to these billboards? And let's remember that the new billboards and video screens will be a new media in our cities--one that shifts ad dollars from print and broadcast news media, and moves it to pure ad media--no news content is supported by these billboards.

To me, it seems like bikes are being used as icing on the cake--the cake being profit from advertising and from monetizing overtime bike trips.

Finally, I think riding a bike can be beautiful--riding a properly fitted, reasonably light bike (which can cost less than $500), is a real experience--not too mention much more efficient and fun than riding a 45 pound "public" bike.

Bike sharing may be the right way -- but let's look clearly at it, and let's make sure we encourage and develop all forms of cycling, not just corporate biking.

--Michael McGettigan

President, Trophy Bikes Philadelphia,

past board member, Bicycle Coalition of Greater Philadelphia

LCI 320, League of American Bicyclists

NOTE: by all accounts, bike shops in areas with large bike share programs experience a rise in sales and service, so although bike share would increase my profits, I believe principle is just as important.

Michael McGettigan of PA @ Jul 23, 2008 09:51:02 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Fresh Greens

Fresh Greens

Maura Judkis is a producer at U.S. News. She writes about the green movement and looks for ways to be an ecofriendly consumer without breaking the bank. Send her your green tips.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!