Rick Newman

How a 4-Pound Bird Wrecks a 75-Ton Plane

By Rick Newman

Posted: February 3, 2009

As we've all learned by now, a fairly small bird can cause devastating damage to a jetliner. While it's not official, it appears that US AIrways Flight 1549 crash landed on the Hudson River on January 15 after one or both engines sucked in birds and conked out, leaving the jet without power.

[See how Capt. Sullenberger really saved Flight 1549.]

It might seem starting that a small element of nature can neutralize million-dollar modern technology, yet in the aviation business, the risk of bird strikes has been well understood nearly as long as planes have been flying. That's why engine manufacturers conduct routine tests to assure their engines can withstand foreign objects. In one typical test, a bird carcass weighing about four pounds is fired into the engine.

Part of the goal is to build engines durable enough to keep operating even if they ingest small objects. But above a certain size, that's impossible. So manufacturers also design engines to assure that any parts that break off stay contained inside the engine. Otherwise, they'd become shrapnel that could easily rip through the soft aluminum skin of the jet's fuselage, wrecking its airworthiness and possibly harming passengers. As long as the fuselage is intact, planes are designed so they can keep flying after losing an engine.

Here's a video that's been circulating in the aviation community. It shows a bird-strike test of a Rolls-Royce Trent 900 engine, which powers the Airbus A380 jumbojet. (Please click here for an important update on the video below.) That's bigger than the A320 that crashed in the Hudson, which was equipped with different engines. Still, this test demonstrates why it would be rather startling to be on a plane when one of the engines sucked in a bird.

 

NOT a bird ingestion test

What ever else inclusion of this video seeks to demonstrate, this was not NOT NOT! a bird ingestion test.

What is shown here appears to be the most violent and top-end of the worst-cast scenario tests designed to demonstrate the engine housing's ability to contain the parts/shrappnel from a multiple blade-off failure inside the turbine. The rotational unbalance of the engine hub here is the most extreme I have seen in video. This effect could theoretically be caused by bird strikes into the fan blades, but I'm lead to believe that the bird issue in Fl 1549 had more to do with bird induction into the turbine combustion chambers, at which point the engine(s) flow(s) stalled and combustion / thrust was lost.

aviator of VT @ Feb 24, 2009 12:31:22 PM

Lighten Up Fransis

You know...its a great flick and it sparked some great conversations. The point of the post is that we allow millions of dollars and hundreds of lives to rest on the probability of a flock of geese NOT getting sucked into a jet engine? Well, I just answered the question...its all based on probabilities. So, smoke-m if you got-m, drink like a fish, party all night, sleep all day because in the end the most dangerous thing you can do is drive to work without your seat belt.

Qui-Jon of NE @ Feb 09, 2009 10:59:01 AM

Not a Veterinarian,

But I know a horses' behind when I smell one. I've seen the original documented testing of a GE turbofan engine. They did every test in the book, includung throwing FROZEN twenty pound turkeys into it, not to mention enough water to fill a few swimming pools, enough block ice to threaten the north pole, and they did a blade out test. With the exception of the blade out test, the engine never missed a beat, and kept running. I don't know what those birds were, or how many, but I know enough that if both engines were knocked out, it was a LOT of them, and at least two of them were positioned properly to take the engines out. The big fan in the front is not the engine, it's just a big propellor for all intents and purposes. The actual ENGINE, sits behind the fan on a common shaft, and is about a quarter the size of the fan, so not nearly as big a target. The jet does not go boom, either. It simply slices the creature into pieces, and usually ejects it and keeps going.

Knock out both engines? With what I know, that's pretty impressive. That's REAL impressive.

Hats off to the pilot, It'll never happen to him again.

As far as the video, I don't think anybody has posted a "bird digested by jet" on You Tube yet. At least he tried.

Macgyver of WI @ Feb 09, 2009 09:03:51 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!