Rick Newman

Why GM Is Ready to Rebound

By Rick Newman

Posted: July 10, 2009

It may take awhile to convince car buyers, but General Motors has emerged from bankruptcy with better prospects for a profitable future than virtually any of the automaker's critics predicted a few months ago. Here's why:

It exited bankruptcy in record time. Chrysler surprised nearly everybody by emerging from bankruptcy in 40 days. GM, a far bigger and more complex company, beat that by a couple of days. That gives the "new GM" a fighting chance to escape the cloud of failure that has hung over the company for much of the last year. "It helps them get the idea that 'GM equals bankruptcy' out of consumers' minds," says Michael Robinet of forecasting firm CSM Worldwide.

[See 10 cars hurt most by the recession.]

Its biggest problems are in the past. GM has left behind billions in debt, axed hundreds of low-volume dealerships, and gotten rid of its four underperforming brands: Hummer, Pontiac, Saab and Saturn. It can now spread marketing dollars and other resources among fewer, better cars.

The new GM is built for speed. CEO Fritz Henderson has described how GM is stripping out several "strategy boards" and other layers of management that have been in place for decades, and cutting 450 managers from its white-collar work force. If done right, that could allow GM to bring cars to market faster and respond more effectively to shifting consumer tastes. GM has also reduced its labor costs to the point that they're practically equal to the most efficient automakers, removing another obstacle to profitability.

GM already has appealing cars. Its overall lineup is still spotty, but popular vehicles like the Chevrolet Malibu, GMC Acadia, Cadillac CTS and new Chevy Camaro represent plenty of good product that's available today. Sales of such vehicles could take off if GM can exploit its quick exit from bankruptcy to convince buyers the company is back on its feet, and will be around for the long haul. Chrysler, by contrast, still has huge holes in its product lineup, and they might not be filled for two or three years.

[See 10 cars getting a boost from the recession.]

GM has to work hard to win back consumers. Henderson admitted as much when he said that GM will try to distinguish itself by reaching out to buyers in new ways, such as listing vehicles for sale on eBay. Even if GM only half-delivers, some customer pampering could pay off, as long as GM's vehicles are up to scratch as well. "Consumers have demonstrated they will endure a so-so customer experience to obtain a great vehicle,” says Jack Nerad of car research site kbb.com. “Consumers haven’t demonstrated they will accept a so-so vehicle because of a great customer experience.”

The feds want out of GM. Despite all the rah-rah, many Americans hate the idea of buying a car from a company run by the government. The real measure of success for GM will be a public offering that buys out the U.S. government's 61 percent stake in the company, and the repayment of $50 billion in taxpayer loans. Ahead of schedule. Henderson hinted that a public offering could come as early as next year, with hopes to pay back the loans ahead of the 2015 deadline.

[See who will gain from the GM bankruptcy.]

The feds want that too. " The government is making sure they're setting GM up for success," says Robinet. "This must be done and dusted by 2012." That's because the success or failure of GM will be a big issue when President Obama runs for reelection. One sign of the government's eagerness to exit is the return of GM "car czar" Bob Lutz, widely credited with revitalizing GM's product lineup. Lutz, 77, announced his retirement earlier this year, presumably because he didn't want to work for "Government Motors." GM's federal overseers probably had to promise to stay out of Lutz's business in order to lure him back. Now Lutz, Henderson, et. al. need to convince a lot of skeptical car buyers of the same thing.

Would you buy GM if....................

If GM provided all repairs on your car for the life of your GM loan. Not just power train but the whole damn car/truck. Once your loan is up warranty is over. You'll have to pay for the maintenance ( oil, wiper blades etc.) but GM will ensure you're car is running 24/7.

Now would you buy?

Would you trade in that Honda or Toyota?

Read this Fritz of FL @ Oct 12, 2009 17:52:46 PM

Politics

I don't belong to the UAW that helped elect Comrade O. I've always bought a GM vehicle and never owned anything else. If you have a company and run it into the ground then it should die and not have the UAW vote for me buddie bailout. Stealing tax payers money to save a company run by people who can't supply what the market wants should not be allowed. That's the world of capitalism. The "C" word. But I'm sure someone wants to get re-elected. Government Motors . . . Ha Ha, I love it! Maybe Gov Motors can produce a car that sings the Comrade O song to indoctrinate children like the public schools do. That car only comes in red. And you can buy the car even if you are not a US citizen and not elegible to run for president.

I currently own a 2000 Chevy pickup. It's a truck for God sakes and it's not built very well at all. It's a big tin can. Check out the emergency brake system design too for example. The engine keeps running well, thank God. Tranny is starting to slip and it's got less than 130K on it. It's a truck! What's up wif dat? Gee, can I say God without offending any Comrade O liberals? God God God God God! I'm thinking of changing my last name to God and becoming a school teacher.

I guess when you have to pay all those union benifits and for people who aren't even working anymore, you have to cut corners everywhere on your product and charge way too much for it. Bailouts and unfair competition from our own gov to foreign car makers always kept me from buying them. I don't think I'll ever buy another GM product again after watching the communist party steal my tax dollars.

Well, I'm going to open a company and run it into the ground and get a $50 billion bailout and retire! Maybe two companies! Whoo Hoo. Where's my check! Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

Big D of TX @ Oct 08, 2009 00:06:17 AM

We have bailed out foreign cars for years

Dont forget americans have bailed out the Toyotas Nissans and Hondas of the world for years with cash and other incentives, amounting to billion$ to locate their plants in the U.S. Their own home governments were doing the same. All this to compete against other americans. I'll agree Big Three quality was'nt up to snuff in the 80's and most of the 90's but it has been the last decade. The quality in most cases is just as good and the prices are more competetive then are the Japanese brands. The Korean brands are another story. I question how they can sell their cars so cheap here. Our Kia dealer has given a "free" entry level model away when you purchase a more expensive model. How can this add up to profitability? My guess is if the Koreans cant sell it here, they just dump it here. There use to be anti-dumping laws in this country and if so they are not being inforced. It burns me up to think that cash for clunkers gave them an even more unfair advantage. I find it funny that americans hate the U.S. auto companies for getting bailouts when they have been doing the same for foriegn companies for years.

Allen Yates of IL @ Oct 07, 2009 12:58:18 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!