Rick Newman

Who Will Gain From the GM Bankruptcy

By Rick Newman

Posted: June 1, 2009

The huge General Motors bankruptcy is the best of several bad options for America’s biggest automaker. By allowing the company to shed debt, unload its weakest assets and rapidly streamline, the Chapter 11 filing allows GM to stay in business, become competitive once again and someday return to profitability.

But it also imposes pain on millions who cast their lot with GM over the years. Stockholders will lose virtually the entire value of their holdings. Some bondholders, like big banks and other investing firms, will lose a portion of their investment. Others, like retirees and families who bought GM bonds thinking they’d be a safe fixed-income investment, could lose a lot more.

[See which stockholders will lose the most from the GM bankruptcy.]

The bankruptcy also gives several GM competitors a boost. Here’s who stands to gain the most (not including the bankruptcy lawyers):

Ford. It’s got financial problems of its own, but GM’s crosstown rival looks like it may be able to solve them without declaring bankruptcy or asking for a bailout. That puts Ford at the top of a troubled domestic heap. “Ford’s in a good position,” says Craig Cather, CEO of forecasting firm CSM Worldwide. “Anybody who wants to buy American would be likely to have more confidence in Ford than in GM or Chrysler.”

CSM predicts that Ford’s U.S. market share, about 16 percent now, could rise to nearly 19 percent by 2015. With overall industry sales expected to rebound nicely by then, a few extra points of share could push Ford’s overall U.S. sales from about 1.5 million this year to 3 million by 2015. That would be a huge gain almost certain to propel Ford past GM as the biggest U.S. automaker.

[See how buying a car is going to change.]

Chrysler, the other domestic automaker, probably won’t benefit from GM’s woes. Even though it will emerge from bankruptcy sooner than GM, Chrysler still has a weak product portfolio, and new vehicles from partner Fiat won’t arrive for a couple of years at least. CSM predicts Chrysler’s U.S. market share will dwindle from about 11 percent this year to a mere three percent by 2012.

Toyota. Japan’s biggest automaker is losing money, too (recurring theme: the car industry is a really lousy business right now) but it’s not in dire straits like its American counterparts. And Toyota’s steady growth in the U.S. should continue. With GM getting smaller and Ford moving carefully for awhile, CSM’s projections show Toyota edging out the two American carmakers to become the top seller of cars in the U.S. by 2011. If gas prices spike unexpectedly, Toyota could grow faster, thanks to its pole position in high-mileage hybrids.

[See why foreign automakers are more “domestic” than Detroit.]

Hyundia and Kia. Jack Nerad of car-research site kbb.com says that bargain-hunters concerned mostly about price tend to buy either domestics or Korean-made vehicles, since Japanese and European brands tend to be a bit more expensive. With GM and Chrysler looking shaky, “the Korean brands are likely winners,” says Nerad. Both brands have been on the rise anyway, thanks to big quality improvements, base models that include a generous set of features, and surprise hits like the luxurious Hyundai Genesis.

[See how to tell if you should buy an American car.]

Imported minicars. They could come from Korea or China or India, but the odds are rising that more cheap, small imports will make it into U.S. showrooms. One possible entry point is Saturn, the money-losing division that GM plans to sell. With nearly 400 modern showrooms and a recognized brand name, Saturn could offer a foreign-based carmaker a ready-made retail network in the United States. Penske Automotive Group, one possible buyer, might try to sell cheap Korean cars as Saturns.

[See 7 American cars worth bailing out.]

General Motors. The biggest beneficiary of the GM bankruptcy may be GM itself. “They’re going to be in a good position once they’re out of bankruptcy,” predicts Gary Dilts of J.D. Power & Associates. “GM has a pretty good product plan, and they’re leaving 10 years of debt on the side of the road.” The most important things for GM are minimizing the damage to its brand image, erasing doubts in car buyers’ minds, and detaching the surviving divisions—Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC—from the troubled parts of the company, which could wind through bankruptcy for months. If it does that, GM could bounce back smartly by 2011. Call it a counterconventional bet.

wages

Extravagant demands from marginally skilled and under educated union employees have driven manufacturing jobs out of this country. Cheap foreign wages are not to blame, but rather exorbitant and unrealistic domestic wages.

len of UT @ Nov 08, 2009 21:13:29 PM

gm bankrupsy

Way back in the Clinten administration they started outsoursing work. Then they started making more and more of the production of cars & parts in other countries. This put a lot of people out of work. But profit for CEOs & stockholders ruled. Soon whole factories were sent out of the country. Mexico, China,Japan are all making our cars and Parts. So when all these millions of Americans are out of work who can afford to buy cars or anything else???

Bev Randazzo of MI @ Nov 08, 2009 20:44:40 PM

Planned Obscolescence

I knew GM was in for trouble when it failed to respond to the market - high gas prices means that SUV and truck sales suffer. That seems obvious enough to me and I'm no Business person or CEO. Also, their policy of planned obscolescence - that of buying a car which is guaranteed to break down faster than (dare I say?) imports, thus creating demand for replacement of GM car parts.

Tell me this - if you were looking to invest, would you put money into a fund that continually requires you to add more funds when its competitors do not?

GM was providing the biggest, most obnoxoius autos to its designers and even paying their gas through company cards, even, get this, when they lived farther out of town than the suburbs. Tell me how that's going to insure profits, again?

Unions are partially to blame, yes. UAW had people living on pensions, covered heaps of their health care and were generally enjoying the fat of the hog. That money could have gone into research and marketing for GM (then again, if it flaunted Hummers and heavy autos, I guess that department wasn't watching the market).

Truth is, people's spending generates demand - we can all agree on that one as it is a fundamental tenet of economics - and demand explains why GM is now digging itself out of its rosy little universe of cake and Hummers.

They seemed to catch on pretty quickly though, when the car market started to tank. I'd be interested in their IPOs next year, and if I was in the market for a shiny new box 'o wheels, I'd buy American. That Cadillac sedan looks pretty delicious.

Yeah, GM had a little bit of a longer learning curve, but the coalescence of factors leading to its near demise - high gas prices, sub-par quality, union coverage - can only force them to trim the fat, decrease their product line, and build their reputation by enhancing quality.

Oh wait, they're already doing that.

I remain optimistic for them.

Leah of DC @ Aug 28, 2009 17:06:56 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Rick Newman

Rick Newman

The global economy is mysterious, even scary. Chief Business Correspondent Rick Newman connects the dots. In addition to his writing for U.S. News, Rick is the co-author of two books: Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11, and Bury Us Upside Down: The Misty Pilots and the Secret Battle for the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!