Dave's Download

Feds Will Stop Some TV Stations From Going Digital Early

By David LaGesse

Posted: February 5, 2009

It looks like federal regulators may force some TV stations to continue broadcasting an analog signal, not allowing them to switch to all-digital to save money.

The FCC has to approve stations that want to make the move. The Los Angeles Times reports that acting FCC chairman Michael Copps was pointed in saying not all stations will get approval:

"We reserve the right to deny those requests if we find that it would not serve the public interest or if it would frustrate Congress' goal of giving consumers adequate time to prepare."

One argument for keeping analog broadcasts is safety, as many people turn to their TV for information in natural disasters and other emergencies. That was a key point behind Congress voting to delay the deadline until June that would force all stations to make the switch.

Nobody seems to know how many stations want to make the switch early. A proponent of the delay said broadcaster groups had privately estimated about 300 stations would make the switch. Added Mark Lloyd of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights: "There will be pockets of communities across the country that will have a mix of analog and digital and some that will be digital only."

The estimate may be low. At least half of the nation's 356 PBS stations alone will make the switch, according to a spokeswoman quoted by The Associated Press.

Whatever happened to free tv and privacy of the phone

What are we doing here. What has happened to free TV and Privacy. Is everything now a privilege and not a right? Television was meant to inform and not just to entertain and certainly not just to make money. Do anyone think that that this is a bad idea to give up certain rights of freedom and privacy (or is these privileges) of the "American people." Next it will be our phones and radios that goes, digital. Digital is a slippery slope that should not be stepped on. Freedom to choose analog or digital. Television was meant to be free and paying $40-$80, subsidized or un-subsidized is NOT Free. I'm not a smart person, but I believe we are heading down irrevocable situations of change and control from the masses to the few or are am I late?.

me of CA @ Feb 15, 2009 17:56:53 PM

Analog

The analog signals were sold to cell-phone companies. The switch to digital is an attempt to reduce money spent on the power to transmit, sending signals more efficiently. Once again, the government is going to cost a lot of companies more money (some that can't afford it like PBS) to maintain both transmissions. Different antennas are required to transmit the signals, so figure in upkeep/maintenance/land payments. So, just as it has been recently, pump more taxpayer money to poor folks who have had more than a year to save the $40ish dollars, who can just as easily listen to the radio. Seriously?

Citizen of ID @ Feb 09, 2009 20:52:46 PM

What happens to the analog?

Who will use it and for what?

Radio broadcast bands went to ham operators and then the least desirable bands went to CBers.

Some use will undoubtedly be found by somebody for the analog tv bands, waves or whatever they are.

But who, what and why?

HillbillyBill of TN @ Feb 06, 2009 09:57:31 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Dave's Download

Our in-house gadget guru, Senior Writer David LaGesse, checks out the latest technologies and gizmos, from computer software to GPS systems -- and reports back to you in plain English.


advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!