Capital Commerce

Obama: Is Bank Nationalization Off the Table?

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: January 28, 2009

Bond market guru David Goldman of the marvelous Inner Workings blog thinks so:

What convinced the Obama administration not to play Dr. Frankenstein with the banking system? The collapse of the British pound and the soaring cost of insuring against a British default must have gotten someone’s attention. The sharp backup in US Treasury term yields despite an equally sharp fall in US equity market, moreover, must have alerted some in Washington that the credit of the US Treasury was not impregnable. The worst thing about bank nationalization is NOT that the government will do a bad job of banking. Everyone does a bad job at banking. The worst thing is that it places untold trillions of dollars of new liabilities on the shoulders of a federal government that already is borrowing well over $1 trillion a year.

Me: You can also toss the rising cost of sovereign debt insurance into the mix as well.  But I am not sure that the First Bad Bank of the United States option is any better.

DqfkpmIOSHlETaJl

ontyime.txt;4;5

wtMOzRqzW of @ Aug 09, 2009 06:47:12 AM

dMuHncuyPFkuHjaZ

ontyime.txt;4;5

hLSsNPuZFOIfZEZ of @ Aug 09, 2009 01:03:58 AM

u 15640 cialis

WJroBV I bookmarked this link. Thank you for good job!

u 15640 cialis of NV @ Aug 02, 2009 06:54:50 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!