Capital Commerce

Yellowstone Supervolcano Earthquakes: Scientists React

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: January 5, 2009

What is the meaning of the (suddenly quiescent) earthquake swarm at Yellowstone National Park? Here are takes from two more top volcanologists. First up is Stephen Self, who presented a report on the hazards from a supervolcano eruption to the British government in 2005 and does work for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

I think that it is part of normal background seismicity at a large caldera volcano such as Yellowstone. Such swarms probably take place every few 10s of years, but we have been monitoring these volcanoes at the present level for only about 10-20 years. Thus a swarm may seem new or unusual whereas it's really part of business-as-usual. It may signify magma moving around underneath, or hot water, but these movements take place intermittently and quasi-steadily for many 100s of thousands of years. If this swarm were followed quite quickly (months-years) by another, and then another, and the intensity and frequency was seen to rise, then a re-think of this opinion may be in order.

Next up is Bil McGuire of University College London, also considered one of the U.K.'s top volcanologists. He has appeared frequently in television documentaries both there and in the United States:

I have indeed been paying attention to the Yellowstone situation and there have now been more than 500 small quakes since December 26th. This is certainly somewhat unusual activity, compared to recent decades, but not particularly unusual for so-called 'restless' volcanic calderas such as Yellowstone. The Campi Flegrei caldera in the Bay of Naples, for example, experienced many thousands of earthquakes in the 70s and 80s, along with surface swelling of 1 - 2 metres, all without eruption.

At Yellowstone, the quakes may have a number of causes, including movements along an active fault or the fracturing of rock in response to the migration of hot water or magma. Even if the latter, however, the chances are that the magma will stay beneath the surface, cool and solidify. The last eruptive activity here was a good 70,000 years ago, so the annual probability of an eruption is very small, although a steam blast left a 5 km wide crater just 13,000 years ago. So-called super-eruptions have return periods of 600 - 800,000 years or so (the last was 640,000 years ago), so the probability of another super-eruption in any single year is extremely small.

Having said this, it is likely that another eruption will happen at Yellowstone sometime. Not only do we not know when this will happen, but we are also not well versed in differentiating the signs of unrest associated with the normal activity of the caldera from those that presage a forthcoming eruption.

And for those of you just tuning, here is the last bulletin from the Yellowstone Volcanic Observatory on Jan. 3:

Over 500 earthquakes, as large as M 3.9, have been recorded by an automated earthquake system since the inception of this unusual earthquake sequence that began Dec. 27, 2008. More than 300 of these events have been reviewed and evaluated by seismic analysts. Depths of the earthquakes range from ~ 1km to around 10 km. We note that the earthquakes extend northward from central Yellowstone Lake for ~10 km toward the Fishing Bridge area, with a migration of recent earthquakes toward the north. Some of the dozen M3+ earthquakes were felt in the Lake, Grant Village and Old Faithful areas. Personnel of the Yellowstone Volcano Observatory continue to evaluate this earthquake sequence and will provide information to the NPS, USGS and the public as it evolves.This earthquake sequence is the most intense in this area for some years. No damage has been reported within Yellowstone National Park, nor would any be expected from earthquakes of this size. The swarm is in a region of historical earthquake activity and is close to areas of Yellowstone famous hydrothermal activity. Similar earthquake swarms have occurred in the past in Yellowstone without triggering steam explosions or volcanic activity. Nevertheless, there is some potential for hydrothermal explosions and earthquakes may continue or increase in magnitude. There is a much lower potential for related volcanic activity.

bull

shit

jack mehoff @ Oct 29, 2009 17:12:47 PM

Yellowstone Quake

Many people are concerned with predicting when Yellowstone will violently erupt.

The problem that should be of real concern is that this problem is not one of timeline, but rather, one of quantizing potential damage.

A Supervolcano of the Yellowstone size will have many smaller and moderate quakes in swarms periodically. However when the super eruption does occur, emergency plans and regulations will be of no value to anyone. When the big eruption occurs, most of the continental United States will cease to exist anywhere near the volcano. All pasture, cities, mountains etc., shall be burnt under lava flows, or buried in ash. The action of this will be to extinguish life in that zone. Massive clouds of toxic gas will be released. All of this information is readily plausible from existing information which is available at multiple sources

The United States economy would be destroyed in a matter of seconds when this happens. Now, let me take you back to the start of this article, it is a matter of quantizing potential damage which is important. Most humans would seek to define the damaged area of the earth. In reality, the reverse is true, we need to define what would survive. If you include temperature drops across the globe, dust clouds, etc., not much of the earth would remain as we know it, accompanied by violent climate change due to reduced sunlight, much of the globe would be plunged into deep temperatures similar to the Antarctic or Artic regions.

The real question needing to be answered is just what areas on earth will be the least affected by this cataclysm. Why use some inverse logic to define what would be least affected? Because what will be habitable, will be the smallest portion of the globe we know today, and everyone will want to be in that zone. You might be surprised to know which countries will be least affected, certainly the USA will be mostly off the map as far as being habitable goes. Either way, when ANY supervolcano erupts violently, most people in the world are in danger either directly or from the effects of the eruption and following climate change. Either way, the public will not be kept informed in detail. Not because there is a conspiracy to conceal information, but rather, it prevents panic and chaos.

Greg Jones of WY @ Oct 08, 2009 02:05:01 AM

yellowstone quakes

Nobody can be sure, we are not able to predict regular earthquakes and volcanos, how would we be good at supervolcanos?

I knew of the supervolcano there before this recent activity and it is estimated to be due to erupt again around this era and where the earthquakes are happening is exactly where they should be, following their past pattern of movement between eruptions.

That being said, the next eruption could be in a year, in 20,000 years, or may never come as our planet is slowly cooling and becoming less volatile.

Timothy of NJ @ Jun 25, 2009 17:51:38 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!