Sorry, Climate Change Wouldn't Hurt America's Economy

Back to blog

Global warming is not just an economic issue; it is mor importantly a moral and ethical issue

Let me see if I have the thesis of this report clear. It appears that the author seems to believe that since global warming will impact poor nations first, then it is less of a concern for wealthy nations. Seem to me that the author has his moral compass pointing the wrong way.

MD Boyd of CA @ Jan 04, 2009 21:33:12 PM

References can be supplied on request.

@Shamus12017: I would like to see your sources please.

TWysocki of MA @ Jan 04, 2009 18:30:37 PM

Global Climate Change

Gentlemen --

We need to be realistic on the subject of Global Climate Change

There are several points of clarification I would like to make to your presentation, which, I must say, is generally accurate and up to date. The elements of sudden climate change are generally misrepresented in the current popular literature. This is NOT a man-made condition. The real problem is deep sea methane bubbling up from continental shelves all around the globe.

First consideration is the source of Methane. Anything that has grown, from yard clippings to a decaying body, produces methane as it decomposes. Methane from permafrost is a decay product. Methane from the deep ocean (methane hydrate) is totally different. Methane from oil wells is yet a different composition. These must be recognized as such and understood as to their manner of existence, production, and/or release.

Deep sea Methane appears to be the waste product of a bacterial process, and therefore, is a renewable resource! It is a relative clean product of our environment and it has recently been produced in commercial quantities by Japanese scientists in Canada.

Oil well Methane is a very dirty gas -- it is methane with huge amounts of sulfur and other noxious gases mixed with it.

The Methane " bubbling up from Undersea Permafrost" is a decay product.

Next -- Drastic Global Climate Change has taken place at least five different times during the last 400,000 years. Our present cycle is the only one during which man has been a factor.

Methane gas which bubbles up continuously from the deep ocean sources (which in turn disassociates into CO2) is the true source of the "Greenhouse Gas" that has operated in the previous five interglacial cycles -- all of which have been extinction cycles.

These are NOT man made effects, and it IS TOO LATE to change our present cycle, We can only learn to adapt!

References can be supplied on request.

JCSpilman, Huntsville, AL a.k.a.Shamus12017

JCSpilman of AL @ Jan 04, 2009 17:59:02 PM

Say what!?!?!

If you would read the quote in your story you would realize that it says the reason the scientists came to the conclusion that climate change will not have a negative impact in developed nations is: a) LACK OF DATA and b) the disproportionate amount of world GDP which is concentrated in a few countries. Therefore world devastation would be felt relatively equally in day to day life of rich and poor alike but in an economic sense everything would still be rosy for a few nations. That is far from comforting.

Mike Johnston of PA @ Jan 04, 2009 17:21:16 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!