Beyond the Bailout: What Happens Next

Back to blog

Maybe it's time to let the Market shake itself out---let some of the dogs die, let housing costs decline from the over valued levels which most middleclass members can't afford anyway', and let wages and prices find some level of equilibrium. Can it get much worst than the direction in which we've been heading ???

Jay Johnson of NV @ Oct 01, 2008 01:26:21 AM

Bailout

My personal opinion is to limit every politician to 2 terms only just like the president. Too many of them have gained entirely WAY TOO MUCH POWER which is definitely having a negative impact on our country. I'm still in the dark about what's going on and I think that's just what they want.

How can these people be paid the salaries they are, given great health benefits, and paid fantastic pensions for life and get away with what they do? Furthermore, why are they receiving these pensions that our tax dollars pay for when almost everyone else in this country has to go with a 401K which is slowly disappearing because of their inability to just do their job. If I handled my job the way these people do I would be fired in a second!!!!

Virginia of IL @ Sep 30, 2008 12:43:47 PM

Bailout II Proposal

Government is the problem, not Wall Street. Government coercion forcing banks to make loans to uncreditworthy individuals is the problem. Following are parts of a solution:

- Close up shop on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

- Repeal regulations forcing banks to make sub-prime loans for social engineering purposes. (Although the purpose was noble, it was neither constitutional nor practical.)

- Allow corporations to purchase insurance on bundled loan packages rather than a taxpayer bailout.

- Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley, especially ridiculous mark-to-market rules that unfairly wreck corporate balance sheets.

- Cut corporate and capital gains tax rates in half. We are not bringing in revenue with these taxes right now anyway. Our corporate tax rates are the second highest in the industrial world. Lowered rates would bring new investment and new jobs.

Buffal0Bill of VA @ Sep 30, 2008 11:40:39 AM

beyond bail-out

I think congress showed also add thier retirement money, from their own congress created retirement plan. this would insure that they do the right thing.

Alex Hernandez of AZ @ Sep 30, 2008 09:57:17 AM

Speaker of the house

She really blew her career!!How could a women be so utterly stupid.My daughter-in law (a staunch democrat)made this remark to me last night "I can not understand how she ever got that position!Thae peaple that elected her must be BRAINLESS!"She said some other words about her that i cannot say!!

shirley of NH @ Sep 30, 2008 09:21:17 AM

What happens next is........

What always happens next. When something else crowds this mess out of the "news" and the dust settles--the big boys go back to business as usual figuring more new ways to bilk the taxpayers.

HillbillyBill of TN @ Sep 30, 2008 07:04:08 AM

Bailout was Bull!!!!

Let's just think about this for a moment, Mr. Rick Newman, for U.S. News and World Report. Concerning your recent article and the underlying name calling contain therein, I would like to comment. First of all, let's take the financial crisis in the U.S. The original amount was $510 Billion reported to the people of the U.S., and now it's $700 Billion. There are over 204 million people in the U.S. If you take the mortgages of the people that are supposedly causing the current financial crises, of which their average mortgage is $264,000. If you do the numbers, you will see that the supposed financial crisis that is being blamed strictly on the people going bankrupt is less than 10% of the population of the entire United States. I know that there are other factors in there, i.e. people who rent versus people who have a mortgage, etc. It is hard for me to believe that the small minority of people going bankrupt against their mortgages is responsible for such a very large debt and the fall of the stock market. It seems to me that there is a lot of money out there that is not being disclosed to us, the people of the United States, from businesses that have other monies that they invested into other venues besides in the mortgage game. Why should we, the people, let our government bail out businesses with our tax money when we don't have all the facts? Our government has bailed out several businesses, i.e. the airlines and AIG. Not only that, but they want to do it without putting it to a vote by the people. In past experience when we bailed out the airlines, they gave their CEO's millions of dollars in bonuses and the government allowed them, under the bankruptcy laws, to get rid of their employees retirement funds. This allowed a big corporation to screw over the little guy that made their businesses flourish in the good times. Large corporations have lost their values and their way. Enron is another perfect example of a large corporation screwing over the little guy. Those of us that are workers for these large corporations outnumber the CEOs one to one thousand. In other words, and these numbers are not totally correct, there is one CEO getting millions of dollars in bonuses while over one thousand employees no longer have a retirement fund or medical benefits. The last time I did the math on this it sure in the hell didn't add up!

I am one of the little guys working for a larger corporation. My wife and I, at one time, had our own business. We were doing good as a mom and pop operation, and with the good times flourishing, we expanded. Everything on paper seemed great. Then the large corporations didn't pay us. This forced us to shut down our operations altogether. Now I'm back, and content, working for a large corporation. We got ourselves out of our predicament because of large corporations not paying us. It took a lot of time and hard work, with both my wife and I working, to get ourselves out. I still worry about the economy and how am I going to send my children through college so that they don't end up in a situation like mine.

I don't see why my tax dollars should go to bail out corporations doing bad business. The bad business that these corporations did was wrong and they need to pay the piper. These corporations were trying to boost their bottom line and look good on paper, getting fat on the little guy and screwing him out of his retirement. All of us that are getting screwed out of our retirements and are still paying extravagant taxes and are now being asked to pay to bail out the same companies that already got our money in the first damn place. So you see, we aren't worried about our "stock portfolio." We are worried about what bank we can trust, about where our money is safe at, and who is going to screw us over or go belly up taking our money YET AGAIN! It's beginning to look like it's back to the old "stuff it under the mattress" standby in order to make sure that we can stay fed and warm.

All these lawmakers that we, the people, put into office get to take money from lobbyist of these same companies that are going under to help them out. Before our government ever came up with this "idea" to bail out these companies, they should have thought about the constituents that put them there. I find this all a personal betrayal from our government. It's already bad enough that we have a vice president elect Sarah Palin and her entourage that is able to defy subpoenas. Let one of us, the people, try to defy a subpoena. Most of us can't afford the fines or attorneys that it would take. Most of us would get arrested in our homes. This is one example proving one of our elected officials is able to defy the law. Our officials are not above the law or the constituents that put them there. Our government has forgotten about our own constitution in which it states, "Of the people, for the people, by the people."

Jim C of AK @ Sep 30, 2008 05:36:57 AM

How about...

How about the Fed drops the discount rate to 0, organizes an auction for solvent banks to buy the "toxic debt" and then accepts the securities as collateral (based on the auction values) at the discount window.

Tom Hanna of MO @ Sep 30, 2008 05:04:41 AM

Debt Itself

Am I the only one so naive as to think that debt itself might be the problem? No one has remotely questioned the slavery that debt always produces. We as a nation celebrate our philosophy of a debt driven economy, yet want to point the finger at anyone stands in our way of digging our own grave deeper.

K. Carlson of CO @ Sep 29, 2008 23:26:36 PM

reform mortgage

The root of this crisis are greedy banks putting out mortgages to the consumer at very high interest rates and ARM. How about letting all homeowners refinance their houses at the current market value at low interest rate and whatever the difference from their original mortgage will be forgiven? That way, everybody will get a chance at keeping their home with their new mortgage at fix rate, low interest. Foreclosure would be less and we wouldn't be facing a lot of inventory. The banks just had to help their consumer instead of being greedy. That is just my thought.

Ivy of FL @ Sep 29, 2008 22:23:58 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!