Capital Commerce

Congress Will Force Bush to Accept Housing Bailout

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: March 17, 2008

Will President Bush go for a housing bailout? In both his speech to the Economic Club of New York on Friday and, later that day, a televised interview with CNBC's Lawrence Kudlow, the president stopped short of ruling out such a move, though he was critical of the idea. Yet the more folks I talk to in Washington, the more likely it seems to me that the White House will, in the end, support a proposal quite similar to the one being pushed by Democrat Barney Frank in the House. As one former member of the Bush economic team put it: "I do think the odds of enactment have increased and will continue to increase as the economy worsens." Republicans in Congress, up for re-election unlike Bush, may force his hand. Read this new analysis from Daniel Clifton over at Strategas Research (boldface mine):

President Bush traveled to New York on Friday and the main takeaway we received from his speech is that he vehemently opposes Congressional Democrats' efforts to increase the government's role in the housing market. More specifically, Bush made clear his priority was to prevent as many people from losing their homes and will thus oppose legislation authorizing the government to purchase troubled mortgages. And he reiterated and increased his opposition to bankruptcy judges modifying mortgage products for homeowners in bankruptcy. If the credit/market situation continues to deteriorate, at some point, Republican members of Congress will seek to do something and force the Administration to compromise with the Democratic leadership.

Bush publicly bristles at the idea of a bailout—using taxpayer dollars to help make whole the people or institutions that made bad financial decisions. And analyst Jaret Seiberg of the Stanford Group, an institutional research firm, says any bill framed as a bailout is "dead on arrival." But, he adds, the Frank bill does force borrowers, servicers, and homeowners to de facto pay for the rescue, since lenders will be accepting a reduced payment and homeowners will both pay an insurance premium on their new mortgage and forfeit a portion of the profit to Uncle Sam when the house is eventually sold.

But action is far from assured. Economist Alan Viard, who worked for Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, says the administration "will be reluctant to approve anything" like the Frank bill unless the economic situation deteriorates significantly from here.

Acorn and the Democrats pushed for low income loans and bare much responsibility for housing market crashing and the need for bailout.

Too much entitlement thinking is always the downfall of a nation.

Katen of MO @ Oct 11, 2008 12:09:22 PM

BOB of CA

Bob of Ca must be living in a differnt world to say Bush did this. He need to look at the people that took the money. Franks, Dodds, Obama, Jones and the list goes on. To back track abit Bob go back and look who started this jimmy Carter.

Ken of OH @ Sep 28, 2008 18:00:37 PM

bailout not aceptable

why should we bailout the big guys.whwn there are people like us losing everything we own.fannie mae did and the goverment bought them and people like me.are losing my home and sanity.but the goverment is doing nothing to help me,but theyll bailout all the big guys.i was making 40,000 a year and my job went sour.and ive had a hard 4 months and my house is being forclosed on.......WHERES THE HELP FOR THE LITTLE GUYS.....

HAMIAM of FL @ Sep 25, 2008 14:57:36 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!