Capital Commerce

The Terrible Scare Story Hank Paulson Told Congress

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: November 20, 2008

What does a Treasury secretary from a lame-duck Republican administration have to tell the leaders of a Democrat-dominated Congress to persuade them to fork over $700 billion to rescue Wall Street by buying toxic mortgage securities. Well, according to Sen. James Inhofe, Hank Paulson said something like this: "He said, ‘This is going to be far worse than the Great Depression in the '30s.'" (Recall that unemployment hit 25 percent back then vs. 6.5 percent currently.)

But now Paulson has scrapped Plan A. And a new University of Chicago study of a similar plan conducted by Japan in the 1990s concludes Paulson should have never gone that route. Here is what the study found:

"The U.S. financial system is in very fragile shape. As in the recent Japanese financial crisis, the shortage of capital is the fundamental problem that must be fixed. The U.S. bailout plan is similar to the Japanese approach in that it does not clearly identify the capital problem as critical and instead proposes using AMCs to remove distressed assets from bank balance sheets. When Japan used AMCs, their effectiveness was limited in part because they did not purchase enough assets. AMCs did not help recapitalization, either, and Japan had to come up with different mechanisms to use public funds for recapitalization. Both these risks are also present for the U.S. plan."

Me: Indeed, in an interview with CNBC, Paulson seemed to imply that $700 billion was not going to be enough money to make the asset-buy work. And good luck going back for more dough. The first bill barely passed. What's more, FBR Capital Markets estimates that Wall Street needs another $1-2 trillion in new capital, in the form of direct injections, to stablize. And it continues ...

Paulsen--throw the bum out!

Paulsen said that the huge increase in oil price was "clearly" supply and demand and not market speculation all the while key experts were telling Congress that it was speculation trading driving the prices up. Yet, Goldman Sachs kept telling us there was a shortage as tankers sat full all over the world. We can only guess that Paulsen and / or his buddies at Goldman and hedge funds were reaping great rewards.

When the market bubble collapsed with subprime, it is now clear that the 4% consumption drop with oil is not proportional with the 65% drop in price. Paulsen is either ignorant or a liar.

And now we have him guiding the bailout of financial institutions? Bush needs / needed to fire the bum! And if you think this is political, you are wrong. Obama's pick is likely to be worse since those Democratic geniuses guided us to the subprime crisis that combined with high energy costs, got us where we are.

Jim Bortzfield of TX @ Nov 22, 2008 00:24:05 AM

Bank Bailout Money Should Be Going to Companies that Produce

When will the economic experts realize that technological and educational investment should be the biggest benefactor to the bailouts. If we trully want to rebuild our manufacturing base here in the US, we must invest in the industries that keep the US competitive and productive. Does manufaturing debt make us productive? As we are seeing it's just a sink hole.

So if we don't invest wisely now with the billions being spent and running through our governments coffers (it seems to change by the day), may I ask when will we invest in new ideas that will create jobs? We will have missed a tremendous once in a century opportunity to do it wisely and help rebuild our economic footing for this new century.

Just handing out money to banks, hoping they will do the right thing and lend it wiesly is not the ultimate answer we need. This just feeds on what has already been occurring for a decade now. In my opinion, let the strong banks survive these tough times and let the weak banks wither. We have become debt producers by their mass marketing of debt. They have been the primary cause. The banks receiving bailouts have contributed greatly to this shift from producing products to producing debt during this past decade.

Perhaps it's about time these debt producers all went away, and we got back to basics of what made our economy strong in past decades. Investment in people, ideas and those producers of new technology products that will keep America competitive should be the primary focus.

Vince Golubic of TX @ Nov 20, 2008 22:00:32 PM

This is all fine and good to have Treasury continuing to "bail out" things until the bond-buying public (including especially foreigners) figure out that the USA government IS NOT a good risk. We are broke. We should not be able to sell bonds except at high rates. Our government is the biggest debtor in the world and the rating agencies should have long ago downgraded it.

of @ Nov 20, 2008 10:38:41 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!