Capital Commerce

The 11 Blunders of Hank Paulson

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: November 17, 2008

Strategist Ed Yardeni says that  "everything that [Hank] Paulson has done or endorsed has worsened the credit crisis and sent stocks reeling." Like what, for instance? Like these, and I quote:

(1) Paulson's Super-SIV proposal was a distraction that went nowhere. It was the first clue that he likes half-backed schemes that are hard to implement.

(2) The vaunted "Teaser Freezer" hasn't worked. Neither has the Hope Now Alliance. Indeed, many borrowers who've been foreclosed never even heard about these new outreach programs to keep them in their homes.

(3) Letting investment banks borrow from the Fed's discount window just after Bear Stearns failed suggests that letting the firm go was done as a risky gesture to the principle of avoiding moral hazard, which has subsequently been thrown out the window.

(4) The government's unwillingness to provide transparent rescue plans started with the mysterious $29bn Bear Stearns portfolio acquired by the Fed.

(5) After multiple assurances that Fannie and Freddie were solvent, they were seized and put into conservatorship. Stiffing owners of their preferreds opened an estimated $25bn black hole in the capital of regional banks that owned these securities. It also seized up the one market that financial firms had for raising capital.

(6) Refusing to support the suspension of mark-to-market accounting was Paulson's second biggest mistake.

(7) His biggest mistake was letting Lehman go under. Dick Fuld should have been forced out, and Lehman should have been rescued. A guy who ran GS and all the MS advisors around him should have known that letting Lehman go under would blow up money market funds and the commercial paper market. It also blew up the prime brokerage business and massacred the hedge fund industry, which sent stock prices into a free fall.

(8) When AIG was seized, the terms of the government's rescue package were punitive. They've been recently eased, but the firm can't raise funds by selling only 49% of its various non-core assets, as required by its "bailout" deal.

(9) TARP was a really bad idea that was sold to Congress and the public by inciting a panic, and sending the global economy into a tailspin. Claiming that the Treasury could purchase one-of-a-kind troubled assets in reverse auctions made no sense. The RTC solution to the S&L crisis of the early 1990s won't work to end this crisis.

(10) The Capital Purchase Program of TARP, started on October 14, is providing capital to banks that probably should be forced to fail and to those that don't even need it. Hopefully, Congress won't give the second $350bn installment of TARP to the Treasury.

(11) Paulson has been aiming to kill "bad" hedge funds. The result of his disjointed fixes has been a massacre of innocent bystanders, including long-only investors getting killed in all the stocks that hedge funds are being forced to sell.

My take: I think Paulson's credibility with the financial markets has been exhausted. Now I am not sure what the magic solution was. Maybe some  recapitalization of key players plus an Uncle Sam-led home refinancing plan. Or maybe a) suspending mark to market, b) a zero capital gains tax for the next five years, and a corporate income tax holiday. But I will give this to Paulson: He does strike me as a guy who is working himself near death to deal with an amazingly tough problem.

Hank Paulson and Neal Kashkari

How can I contact these two men? Can you supply me with their addresses or their Email addresses?

Pastor Phil Schoenherr of OR @ Feb 10, 2009 15:41:42 PM

Mark to Market Accounting

I would expand point 6 to add "and perpetuating the impression that the mortgage-backed securities are toxic assets." I don't get it. Replacing MTM with any other method would be more accurate, and instantly recapitalize the affected financial institutions. Let's use an extreme example: Let's say that, for a given security, half of the securitized mortgages are bad, foreclosed, and will sell at a sheriff's sale at 10 cents on the dollar. What that would mean is that the security is only worth 55% of its face value. Under MTM, we're saying that, because no one's buying or selling, the security is worth zero. How accurate is that? This isn't smoke and mirrors accounting, this is a correction of a basic misrepresentation of the capital structure of every institution with sub-prime mortgage securities. Replacing MTM with a more objective measure would be the single greatest way to recapitalize the affected institutions.

Bob Schaefer of OH @ Nov 21, 2008 16:06:11 PM

You are right

What you write is true - Hank Paulson has been a disaster. There really are no words to express how stupid it was to let Lehman fail - except may hubris - hubris that the American financial system would shake it off and that his buddies from Goldman would survive and prosper with one less competitor. I disagree that more transparency is needed - the Treasury should be working like the Fed - mysteriously. We are in a vicious deflationary spiral and the market should believe that Treasury might buy any asset at any time. That gives investors confidence they are buying alongside the government and makes shorts fear they are selling the asset that the government is about to come in and buy. There will be plenty of time a few years from now to review what was actually bought and when.

Paulson's plan now seems to be punting the ball to the Obama administration - really capping the abject failure that his tenure has been. In light of the market's recent moves - especially the dangerous sell off in financials - one must wonder if our economy and financial system can wait 2 months for someone to come in and straighten this mess out.

When the historians write the books on the Great Depression II, they will certainly write about how Hank Paulson was the WORST TREASURY SECRETARY EVER.

Lloyd of NY @ Nov 19, 2008 19:10:29 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!