Two Cheers for Russia's Invasion of Georgia

Back to blog

Our 'ally' was a manipulative brat

Gerogia is a Western ally only because it wanted to regain an internationally recognized independent South Ossetia as part of its territory. It's not like South Ossetia became independent last week. It happened 12 years ago and Georgia has been fuming ever since.

Georgia TRIED to get into NATO, so that if it pulled this kind of bone-headed stunt (and it would), and Russia intervened (and they would/did), NATO would be forced, by International treaty, to respond, pitting the US and Western Europe against Russia over a piece of territory the inhabitants of which long ago declared independence from the invader. Georgia KNEW it couldn't fight Russia alone and thought its oil pipelines would be enough to get Europe and the US involved when their petition to join NATO was put on hold.

Georgia was a bully who was trying to manipulate its big friends when it to picked on someone smaller who had a bigger friend. Georgia got what it deserved.

That said, why the hell is this idiot author shilling for the Republican energy plan based on this whole thing? "All of the above" is a plan? Gods, I hate policy-making by slogan. It appeals to the weak minded sheeple of the world.

All of the suggestions listed WILL DO NOTHING IN THE LONG RUN unless steps are taken NOW to change our lifestyle without necessarily reducing our quality of life. High energy prices encourage that change, as well as spur the research and development of the very energy alternatives we need. Gas prices will not trend downward for very long because as soon as more people start using gas, up goes the price again. The US does not have enough oil reserves - drilled or not - to meet CURRENT US demand. And does anyone think the oil companies will let themselves be locked into a US market when someone else will pay more for the same oil? Not in this reality. Talk about deluded. Besides, if the US stopped all oil exporting, so would other countries, and since we don't produce enough to meet our own needs - and CAN'T even if we drilled everything we have - other countries would hoard oil as well. And when it's all gone, what then, genius?

I don't like paying high gas prices any more than the next person, but that only makes me look at alternative ways of using less gas. That saves me money more than any of those impractical, five to twenty years until it's online BS ideas. The idea of energy independence is attractive and certainly not isolationist. We need energy independence, but we don't have to ruin the country, or the planet, or destroy the future of our children to do it. We have an opportunity to do it right, instead of right now and since none of the suggestions above are a 'right now' solution, why not do it right for a change?

"All of the above" only works when all of the answers provide a solution, and they all don't. Let's be responsible for a change in this.

Fatesrider of CA @ Aug 12, 2008 16:21:16 PM

"As for peace through strength, don't forget your Republican commander in chief has the ground military so strapped, we could not respond to an ally in distress on a bet. Putin knows this. Why don't you? Do they dupe 'em good in MO or what?"

Daniel David, Putin also knows that the no one in the West would fervently criticize what he is doing and they would seek to morally equate what he is doing to what we had done in Iraq. He also knows that the UN is feckless and won't be able to do anything as long as Russia has veto power, that we would blame Georgia as the aggressor and that as long as we perceive we need Russia, we will not do anything to upset that balance.

You're right that with the current missions in Afghanistan and Iraq we wouldn't want to get in a major war with Russia. But you are a fool if you only think that the reason Putin took this action was because of American weakness. It is world weakness he correctly perceives and it is because of world weakness he took this action.

And if this does not drive home the point that WE NEED INDEPENDENT, DOMESTIC ENERGY SUPPLIES I don't know what does.

Chris of AZ @ Aug 12, 2008 15:56:10 PM

What's a "weekling"

Go ahead, Fazha, support your Republicans. But don't try to fool us that you would know a "family issue" from a turnip.

As for peace through strength, don't forget your Republican commander in chief has the ground military so strapped, we could not respond to an ally in distress on a bet. Putin knows this. Why don't you? Do they dupe 'em good in MO or what?

Daniel David of NM @ Aug 12, 2008 15:31:11 PM

No Borders

I say we fight until the bitter end... No Borders... only US and them. Anyone who supports the death of America or is against our fight should either step aside or be crushed. We won't be finished until the last terrorist bass turd is dead... I hope!

Damien Fraley of LA @ Aug 12, 2008 14:54:15 PM

Libertarian Response to a dumb democrap

Republicans want Peace through Strength where Democrats want peace through submission. I am a Libertarian... I will follow the Republicans if the subject is security, defence, personal protection, and family issues for sure. This weekling above my post is an idiot!

Fazha Kinzfragun of MO @ Aug 12, 2008 14:50:38 PM

Mercy, what an assault (on reason)

Only a Republican shill would title an article "Two Cheers for Russia's Invasion of Georgia"----so he could give you the Republican solution. Cheers for an invasion!!!!! That's the mean-spirited tag.

Oops, we've had a dang Republican for 8 years. No solution.

Wrong hat (as Bullwinkle used to say).

Daniel David of NM @ Aug 12, 2008 14:14:23 PM

Did I hear what I think I heard?

Did GWB really look into the eyes of V. Putin and see his soul and now tells that soul that he should not invade a country with a soverign government and to withdraw all troops immediately?

Or else, the Texas cowpoke will wag his finger at him maybe?

And it took just hours for the U.S. to airlift Georgian troops in Iraq back to Georgia to defend their homeland--but it may take 50 years to withdraw U.S. troops from that same Iraq?

Back home in Crawford, do they sing "What He's done for others, he won't do for you?" on Sunday morning?

HillbillyBill of TN @ Aug 12, 2008 13:18:05 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!