Capital Commerce

A Pale Ron Paul? Skimpy Agenda for Libertarian Bob Barr

By James Pethokoukis

Posted: May 27, 2008

Over the weekend, the Libertarian Party chose former Rep. Bob Barr as its presidential candidate and professional sports handicapper Wayne Allyn Root as its vice presidential candidate. Now since the Barr-Root ticket has scant chance of winning—though it just might spoil John McCain's chances for victory—you would think its policy proposals would be bold ones with lots of details. Barr and Root are in the persuading business, not the victory business, for the moment, after all, so they need to fully display the power of their ideas. Yet when I hopped over to Bob Barr's campaign site, I didn't find too much of what I was looking for, at least when it comes to economic policy. What does Barr propose? Here is the gist:

The federal government must take the lead in making significant cuts in spending. Focusing on earmarks risks distracting attention from the broader problem of a government wildly wasting the money of hard-working Americans. Tens of billions of dollars in corporate welfare—essentially aid to dependent corporations—should be eliminated. Largesse for middle- and upper-income Americans, particularly so-called "entitlement" programs, must be cut. Billions in so-called defense spending, which protects America's populous, prosperous allies rather than Americans, must be eliminated.

Me: What are we talking about here, exactly? Axing all subsidies? Eliminating the R&D tax credit? What sorts of cuts in entitlement spending and how deep? Some more from Barr:

Cutting spending would allow America to implement real tax reform. Our goal should be to reduce both the tax burden on Americans and the intrusion in their lives resulting from IRS enforcement of the income tax. One of the best approaches would be to adopt some form of a consumption tax, like a national sales tax, replacing the Internal Revenue Service and all federal income taxes as well as payroll taxes.

Me: Are we talking the "fair tax" here or something like it? What would be the rate of this vague plan? There are a gazillion think tanks in D.C., including the libertarian Cato Institute, with a gazillion tax reform plans. These are the sorts of broad ideas you would offer if you were at 60 percent in the polls rather than an asterisk. (The Intrade betting market gives a third party just a 1.4 percent chance of winning the election. So far, there's no Barr-Root boomlet.) C'mon on, Libertarians, where are your calls to disband the Fed or put us back on the gold standard or allow citizens to print their own currency? (This is what Ron Paul has called for.) Dazzle us!

Starchild....

Well said. But I hope that you are being overly pessimistic. While not one of my six ballots was cast for Mr. Barr, I am hoping that my overall distrust of the man was mistaken. I have seen several interviews of him and Mr. Root and I have read his writings at several blogs and I believe that Mr. Barr is indeed a libertarian, albeit an imperfect one (most of us are). Mr Root I have very little misgiving about. According to a true blue Libertarian, Mr. Root eagerly asks questions and seeks to refine his own beliefs so that he may be a better libertarian. As someone who seeks be a better Libertarian, he has earned my trust.

Nathan J. Hickson of CO @ Jun 13, 2008 10:15:56 AM

Barr more of a threat to Obama than McCain

The real danger in the Barr/Root campaign is not to the Republicans, but to the Democrats, and the reason is the "blue" Democrats -- the Blue Dogs and the Blue Collars. Current polling shows 12% of Democrats cannot stomach Obama, and these are primarily the Blues. They likely will not switch to McCain either, but in what will be a contentious election, they won't sit it out either. Come time for the debates, they will be open to the small-government pitch of the Libs. The 8% of Republicans who can't stomach McCain may do the same. That's a 4% spread, and enough to influence an election.

But it gets worse for the Democrats. Few Republicans can take the pure-freedom policies of the Libertarians (borders, abortions, drugs, gays, etc) and will not switch. However, these are hot-button issues for Democrats, and ones on which Obama will equivocate. Singe-issue Democrats will defect where as single-issue Republicans won't. Pair this draining of votes with the Nader factor, and it all starts piling up against Obama.

And it gets worse.

For all his charisma, Obama breaks when discussing the details of policy in a confrontational mode. He will wither during the debates when pitted against well-honed warriors like Barr, McCain and Nader. Obama will finish the job the Libs have started.

Enjoy your moment my Democrat friends ... it will be short lived.

Guy Smith of CA @ Jun 10, 2008 11:06:22 AM

Ron Paul was

Count me among those deeply troubled by the results in Denver, which I saw first-hand as a delegate, especially (as Jesse of Illinois writes) the selection of Wayne Allyn Root as the VP candidate. As things stand, myself and many others are stuck with a presidential ticket we cannot in good conscience support.

I hope that Barr and Root make a strong and clear enough break with their conservative roots, and talk enough about hardcore libertarian ideas, to earn my support, if not my enthusiasm. But given the possibility the Libertarian Party's 2008 standard-bearers will not get markedly better, and that they will meanwhile accelerate the party's ideological drift still further by attracting more pragmatist and conservative oriented members, it is definitely worth taking a hard look at the future of the LP as a vehicle for liberty.

For the present however, I think the results in Denver were close enough, and mixed enough, that the fight for the soul of the Libertarian Party is not lost. Leaving the name "Libertarian Party" in the hands of people who aren't promoting libertarianism would be a great loss for the libertarian movement, and those of us who believe in the Non-Aggression Principle would be unwise to abandon ship unless/until an equally viable alternative vehicle for promoting liberty materializes. Therefore I urge my fellow radical freedom loving Libertarians to be patient and not let them drive you out of the party just yet.

There are, as always, many good down-ticket Libertarian candidates worth supporting in this cycle. If Barr and Root do poorly, some previously misguided Libertarians may realize that single-mindedly pursuing the golden ring of electoral success is not the magic bullet they thought it was. And who knows when the U.S. government may unexpectedly commit some outrage that will have a transformatively radicalizing effect on many. Let's see where things go.

Starchild of CA @ Jun 10, 2008 04:04:55 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!