The Ultimate Flaw in Obamanomics

Back to blog

Reaganomics/Bushynomics was a bust

You said :

"My take: It's worth noting that plenty of liberals and Democrats think it would be just fine to return top rates to just the stratospheric levels examined by the CBO. (I appear with them all the time on TV.) The (silly) argument: The economy did just fine at those rates in the 1950s—why not today? I believe John McCain's policy director, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, gave a pretty good answer in a chat with me not long ago:

Because you would also have to root for a world war and have the other economies in the world literally in ruins. "

Either you SuperLie-Siders can't get your stories straight , or Holtz-Eakin knows as little about economics as does McCain.

You always preach about the benefits to the U.S. economy that derives from globalization , since growing numbers of middle-class consumers worldwide will expand the market for U.S.-produced goods and services. If that's true , then the "ruined" world economy of the '50s would have been a DETRIMENT to our economic growth . Presumably , things would have been even better for us had world economies been healthier. Also , the World War was in the '40's , not the '50's , and the '50's were characterized by the rapid reduction in the federal debt/GDP ratio as taxes were raised to pay off the war debt. This should have been a further drag on the economy , yet it was not. The reason is that prosperity was widely-shared then , unlike now , which provided the necessary DEMAND side of the supply-demand interaction that so many of your brilliant rightwing economists have forgotten about.

Because wages have not kept pace with productivity growth , as in the postwar decades , the source of consumer demand in the past 25 years has been placed on the backs of future generations , with skyrocketing levels of public and private debt. Much of the private debt , as it goes into default , will no doubt be added to the public ledgers in order to bail out the principal welfare recipients of this country - Wall Street financiers

Face it , you guys have been cheerleaders for policies that have crippled the strongest economy the world has ever known. When this housing bust is over , the vast majority of middle-class Americans will have little or no negative net wealth , save for that represented by their future claims on Social Security and Medicare , and now you want to diminish the value of that as well ? How do you sleep at night ?

Gordon Gekko would be proud of you.

.

Goldilocksisableachblonde of MD @ May 24, 2008 14:12:25 PM

Boil down.

Obama's first challenge with Social Security is how to get the $2 trillion dedicated Trust Fund back from the payers of income tax who "borrowed" it for spending on other things (including top-end tax cuts and unfunded wars). THAT, not 75-year projections, is the near-term crisis of Social Security. Democrats are indispensable for this task because Republicans won't retrieve YOUR social security money---their DNA lacking both the requisite integity and fortitude. (The author's argument about tax "evasion" being insurmountable is proof of this.)

As for medical care, the sooner that all taxpayers are on the hook for all of it, the sooner we'll find ways to drive down the costs---just as other nations have done and are doing. Citizens CAN tame both the corporations AND the trial lawyers via democratic government anywhere on earth when they choose to do so. We Americans are BEHIND, not ahead, as Republicans insist on imagining.

As for "Obamanomics", there is no such thing. It's just "economics", either led by Democrats for people or led by Republicans for corporations. That's the whole debate, and the rest is smoke and fog.

Daniel David of NM @ May 24, 2008 12:53:05 PM

obamanomics

Sure in a vacuum you bring up good points but there are many more variables that can be used to affect this equation. Here are a few to ponder. Liability reform can drastically reduce the cost of health care. Lets offer different tiered medical services with limited levels of liability. If someone said to me look you can pay for a new dental crown that costs $900 and full liability protection or you can pay $600 for one with limited liability then a lot of people might pick the limited. Another potential variable is to outsource more of our health care to foreign suppliers that use lower cost labor. You okay but I don't want to go to Costa Rica if I want my gallbladder yanked out... Well ponder this. There are 360 Sovereign Native American nations located within the U.S.A. These locations could easily offer international zones for foreign medical services. For example Costa Rica could set up a hospital clinic on an indian reservation and offer services using lower cost labor and foreign laws. For that matter the US could set up international medical zones anywhere it wants. There are many creative ways to reduce health care costs and because Americans have been so rich for so long we forget that creativity can solve so much.. Lets start thinking smart again.

Ace @ May 24, 2008 05:55:33 AM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!