Dude, Where's My Recession?

Back to blog

In-the-Know and the Common Cluecless

Recession is on the minds of the class who track the economy on an almost ritual daily basis. There's no denying the fact there is turbulence in many sectors of our economy. Credit is virtually shriveling under the strain and inflation is nearing the roof.

Hunky-dory is the class who track when the next promotional offerings of Starbuck's latte and jean sale at Nordstrom. While some of us who are buckling down our spending and bracing for what's to come, others are blindly burning money unaware of the plight ahead. When the time come when easy-access money and credit becomes widespread unavailable, perhaps then we can all see the real picture. For the time being, I can only thank the hunkie-dories for keeping our economy afloat.

uckBay of UT @ May 02, 2008 01:25:29 AM

GDP per Capita

It should be pointed out that the main definition of recession has little real meaning in the lives of most people. A much better measure is GDP per capita. When GDP fails to grow as fast as population growth you are in recession. The lives of the average person are getting worse. By this definition we are already in a recession.

The Economist ran a great article on this a couple months back if anyone wants to read more.

jesse of NY @ May 01, 2008 22:59:16 PM

Bush outsmarts them -- yet again

W has the same move: Sit back, let the Dems demand something, then give it to them. It's incredible. His father made the mistake of coming out of a (very, very mild) downturn one quarter too late; he should have taken it in the 2nd Q (the way W is), not the 3rd. The economy will be spritely by July, roaring in September; same with oil: let the futures geeks extend themselves to the max, allow the early summer refinery switchover to take full effect, then open the spigots on the SOR to full--and once again, he's not outstupided. W is really amazing. I'll bet he indicts a few of them too.

Joe Y of PA @ May 01, 2008 20:30:03 PM

recession? Only under the GOP...

There HAS to be a recession. The Democrats said so. The MSM said so. The Democrats need one because they need to blame Bush for a bad economy. Finally. Only if there is a recession, are the Dems able to justify a change. God forbid that Bush gets any credit for anything at all. Complete employment. Stock Market over 11000. Lately, it seems as if recessions only happen if the media convinces the public that there is one happening. If you examine the actual causes of the slow down, liberal policies will be a big reason. Too much gov't interference. Too much spending. To much grandstanding about oil and the war. How is demanding that the oil companies give up 10 billion dollars going to lower the price of oil? NO exploration. No nukes. Too much pork. Remember the banks worrying about "red lining" bad credit risks and they were forced to find a way to lend to those people? It wasn't about race. It was about risk. And now, those risks have become actual liabilities. Fancy that.

Cargosquid-United Conservatives of Virginia of VA @ May 01, 2008 20:00:42 PM

What?

Oh my, what is Sen. Obama (D-Buyer's Remorse) going to do now? "Change!" "Hope!"

Denny, Alaska of AK @ May 01, 2008 17:51:48 PM

Capital gains, and classification of "rich"

I simply can't vote for a candidate, regardless of party, who talks down to us like we are unaware of the numbers.

I cannot accept that my parents may have to pay even more capital gains on their retirement property simply because they were patient and made wise real estate choices over the last thirty years.

I cannot accept the lowering of the classification of "rich", raising taxes even higher on a group of people who already pay 39% of their income to taxes.

We read the actual news, so we know.

Lewis Salem of NC @ May 01, 2008 15:23:37 PM

My economy

I am in sales (selling to suppliers of consumer product manufacturers) and first qarter was good - about 20% over plan. My biggest customer, which had been lagging called today and said they were increasing orders because things are picking up. They sell to paint manufacturers - so paint is picking up. Guess what that means? Yeah - walls need to be painted both re - decorations and new construction. Best investment acive I've ever read (Gerald Appel) is to do the counter-media strategy, becasue business reporting is 180 degrees off. when the NY Times say eeverything is bad,bad, bad it is time to buy, buy, buy. Sell on good news. Remember newspapers employ journalism majors - the first ones to say "They didn't tell me there was math in this class!"

C guy of OH @ May 01, 2008 14:21:14 PM

Recession - the primary definition

To: "Not so bad" (by Dave Green of NC)

If history bores you, scroll to the end of my tale for my thoughts on what "recession" means to the proletariat.

You might be amazed at the number of who people remember the Great Depression quite well. You can check goverment statistics for the number of people over 100, and the number born during the Depression. Visit nearly any retirement or nursing home in the country and you'll meet other people who remember those Depression years. Ask them to share their stories.

My five-generation family of over 200 (including spouses) has a motto: If you don't have cash for 'wants' don't buy them, and always put as much as you can into a investments that pay interest. The only exception is family homes bought with fixed-rate mortgages paid off as soon as possible.

The eldest two generations in my family remember the Great Depression. The ages of generation 1 still living are 104, 102, 99, and 85. All were born and raised on a small ranch bought by an ancestor in the 1840s. During the Depression the family fared reasonably well by selling livestock and poultry and, except for sugar, coffee and rice, raised their own food. The eldest three graduated from a 'teacher's' college, their tuition paid by working as housekeepers 'in town' supplemented by their mother's 'chicken and egg' money. The first two returned to the ranch and taught grades 1 - 12 in a two-room schoolhouse. The third married and taught school in another state. They still have sharp brains and an avid interest in history and politics. The youngest, with his two sons, runs the family ranch. They have no 'hired' hands. His work begins at dawn and ends at sundown, six days a week.

My dad, whose parents were very poor, worked his way through college and grad school and was in the Navy during WWII. During the war we lived in Richmond, CA. Food and many other things were rationed, so we grew what vegetables we could in the garden of our tiny house. An elderly widow in back of us raised chickens. We traded vegetables for chickens and eggs. Mom made most our clothes; the rest were hand-me-downs from older cousins, and we handed our 'out-growns' down to younger cousins.

My husband and I (Generation 2) were 'depression' babies, now in our early 80s. His family was so poor he, along with the other kids in the little town went to school barefoot. He was smart, eventually managed to work his way through medical school, and devoted his career to serving the poor. He never became a 'rich' doctor' but we always set aside what we could for retirement because we though of "Social Security" as a Ponzi scheme for political use.

Finally, RECESSION. American Heritage Dictionary, Fourth Edition: "recession: 1. The act of withdrawing. 2. An extended, moderate decline in general business activity."

By definition #1, many people who aren't greedy and/or 'flippers' are withdrawing j(receeding) from spending on "wants". The cost of their needs (food, gas, clothing) have risen far faster than their incomes or, in the case of retirees, income from conservative investments. A great fear of knowledgeable proletariats, mentioned only in passing (if at all) by the MSM, is that the Democrats, especially if Obama is elected, will take even more of their incomes when the Bush tax cuts, which so many believe affect only "the rich," expire.

Quote: On taxes, Obama again sounded confused about capital gains. He said he was "mindful that we've got to keep our capital gains tax to a point where we can actually get more revenue." So why does he want to almost double the rate? He claimed "that's not something that's going to affect the average person with a 401(k)," even though it's a tax hike on the 100 million Americans who own stock. Source: "Obama's Fox Trot" - Investor's Business Daily - Posted Monday, April 28, 2008

Quote: At a June 28, 2004 Democratic fundraiser in San Francisco, [Hillary Clinton] told supporters that "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

Quote: Tampa Dave writes: Friday, February, 22, 2008 10:13 AM

The Wall Street Journal’s Steve Moore has done the math on Obama’s tax plan. He says it will add up to a 39.6 percent personal income tax, a 52.2 percent combined income and payroll tax, a 28 percent capital-gains tax, a 39.6 percent dividends tax, and a 55 percent estate tax.

People suffering from the inflation of the cost of 'needs,' and who also understand the intentions of the Democrats are withdrawing (receeding) from consumerism.

Grandma Mollie of FL @ May 01, 2008 14:13:19 PM

Newspaper Network TV Recession

Where do you get the idea that all is woe?

By reading the papers and watching network TV.

Whose business model is imploding?

The newspapers and network TV.

Lemme 'splain:

Talking heads and ink-stained wretches see their pals & co-workers losing their jobs.

The scribblers are scared silly because (deep down) they're aware that they have no talents/skills/abilities that anyone values outside their hothouse media world.

Fear + (well-founded) lack of self-worth + Nano particle of evidence = Sky Falling Down!

Now you know!

PS Doin' fine in the worst state economy in the US! Help wanted signs all over...

Jagcap of MI @ May 01, 2008 13:44:58 PM

it's investment, not consumption

The true measure of business cycles is not personal consumption (sorry all you Keynesian holdouts!!!) but investment. The last five (official) recessions pers. cons. has either stayed flat or increased modestly. Where the bus. cycle is obvious is in investment, which plummets during a recession. The last few quarters real investment has declined as has inventory valuation. However, it is interesting to note that the length and depth of the latest investment downturn is historically about average for a recession, and should if the past holds, be turning around. If it doesn't, then we'll know for certain that we're in a recession. And only then will we know the depth of it.

When people say "the economy sucks", or something to that effect, they can only speak from a personal or local perspective. It might "suck" for them or their family or friends, but in the aggregate, that's another issue. There is no doubt we are in a slowdown (or contraction), but that is an altogether different position than a recession (trough).

In fact, we have had such long term low employment, we could clearly have been in an inflationary gap. And, given our huge trade imbalances, it could be the case that the large imports actually had a deflationary effect on the economy. Only now are we seeing inflation creep up as the dollar is depreciating. Thus, the adjustment we are experiencing: higher prices, increased unemployment, decline/slowing in GDP, are all characteristic of a return to natural real GDP, not a "recession".

Since investment has driven the last 25 year record growth, congress should eliminate the cap gains tax and balance the deficit to spur investment and free up loanable funds for business.

Rob Mandel of CA @ May 01, 2008 13:13:24 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You
Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!