Some Deem Double-Hull Tankers Worth the Cost

Back to blog

Another supplemental link

I pointed out the phase-in of the law in the previous day's posting, which is embedded as a link above, but if it would be helpful, here it is as well:

http://www.usnews.com/blogs/beyond-the-barrel/2008/2/28/exxon-still-sails-single-hulled-in-alaska.html

Marianne Lavelle of DC @ Mar 04, 2008 11:59:51 AM

Double Hull double talk

It would have been better journalism to point out to your readers the phase in law than let them assume Exxon Mobil was negligent, and others think they are scofflaws.

J Frailey of CO @ Mar 01, 2008 16:38:02 PM

Some references

Companies have until 2015 to convert to double-hull tankers, according to the U.S. Coast Guard:

http://www.uscg.mil/d13/publicaffairs/news/oil_pollution_act_of_1990.htm

A description of how the law is phased in based on vessel age, gross tonnage and hull configuration, is in this April 2000 General Accounting Office report:

http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/11000/11300/11351/d0080.pdf

Marianne Lavelle of DC @ Mar 01, 2008 11:27:54 AM

agreed

that article was poorly written and researched. and i fight oil companies in alaska for a living.

Bob Shavelson of AK @ Mar 01, 2008 04:36:23 AM

Double Hull

Looks like someone did not do their research. Because, the only tankers that carry crude are double hull by law. It is not a simple fact of company responsibility, it is the LAW. Maybe next do better research into all the facts and do not print only what sells.

Joe of CO @ Mar 01, 2008 01:05:48 AM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You

Beyond the Barrel

Marianne Lavelle, senior writer, seeks out the path to an energy future that doesn’t wreck the planet or put you in the poorhouse.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!