Someone's Apologizing for Sorry Fuel Economy but Not Automakers

Back to blog

I have a honda civic lx and I get 44 mpg. I'm pretty sure that no ford or mercury is going to come anywhere close to that.

Natalie of OH @ Oct 27, 2008 13:12:20 PM

Also,

Better fuel economy technology developed since 1992 was used to justify increased engine size and performance horsepower, extra luxury items such as power windows, air conditioning, etc that add weight to the car, and an overall increase in size of cars.

So even though engines are significantly more efficient today, those gains are offset by consumer demands for luxury, increased space, and performance.

My first car was a 1978 Datsun B210 that got 41 MPG. HOWEVER, it also was much smaller, lighter, had narrow tires (reduced friction losses), had only 89 HP from a tiny 4 cylinder engine, no A/C, no power brakes, crank windows, no safety features except seatbelts and bumpers, and took a day and a half to get to 60 mph, if you were lucky enough to be going downhill with the wind at your back! Gas was under a dollar per gallon at the time.... That car used so little gas, I thought the gas gauge was broken!

Dennis of @ Jul 02, 2008 14:19:01 PM

Not entirely...

Keep in mind the DRASTICALLY stricter safety standards applied to modern vehicles. These can have a significant impact on the weight of a vehicle, and as a result, will reduce the fuel economy (heavier/stronger frames and roll cages, better brakes, air bags, etc). That's not to mean automakers are off the hook for things - they certainly haven't been doing their part (for example, all those electric cars that got smashed despite their owners wanting to keep them). You just have to keep in mind that there are often other factors to consider in the situation as well.

Matt of IN @ Jun 24, 2008 16:09:42 PM

Funny!

Funny how in 1992 I bought a GEO Metro for $9998 that got over 50 MPG...Now... nothing but a $35,000 hybrid gets close to that...What happened to that technology? ??? I think BIG OIL happened to it! We have better technology..but it MUST be being suppressed by someone. Someone who's getting rich off the working mans' pain. Go Burn in hell you greedy F$%^&s

Bill of AR @ May 17, 2008 21:12:07 PM

Back to blog

Add Your Thoughts
About You

Beyond the Barrel

Marianne Lavelle, senior writer, seeks out the path to an energy future that doesn’t wreck the planet or put you in the poorhouse.

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!