Alpha Consumer

The Cost of Getting Married

By Kimberly Palmer

Posted: September 24, 2009

Marriage has long been advocated as a way to counteract poverty, since something about making a lifetime commitment seems to help generate wealth. That's one reason some people advocate public policies that encourage walks down the aisle, from subsidized marriage counseling to tax credits. But recent research by professors at Saint Mary's College and the University of Notre Dame found that in some cases, current tax policies penalize marriage, especially among low income couples.

A single mom with an income of $21,000 and two children, for example, can receive earned income and child tax credits of $5,460. If that single mom dates a single dad with the same financial profile, they would each receive $10,920 in tax credits. But if they got married and filed jointly, they would jointly receive only $3,400. That means marriage would cost the couple $7,520 a year.

The researchers say policymakers should change the tax code so it doesn't impose a cost on people who choose to get married.

Couples in higher income brackets can face a similar problem: Two high-earners can push themselves into a higher tax bracket than the one they would face individually.

For more on the financial impact of marriage, see: "Marriage's Financial Pros and Cons."

What many fail to see...

I'm all for marriage and it's quite undeniable that the breakdown of the family has tremendous financial implications of which children suffer most. However, many fail to mention that there is distinction between first marriages and remarriages. The protective factors are not the same AT ALL--especially for kids. Kids actually do better in single parent families than in remarried/step families. Currently, about half of the marriages is the US are re-marriages. Luckily, there has been a recent groundswell of research and evidenced-based knowledge showing what makes marriage succeed or fail. It is essential that first marriages have the best shot at success by making this knowledge commonplace. - @imarriage http://marriagetweets.com

Marc of CA @ Sep 24, 2009 16:17:51 PM

Catholics "get" something here

These researchers see a negative moral issue to be exposed if government has constructed any policies which financially encourage people to merely live together and not get married.

Fine. Here is something else coming down the pike that I wish they would also address. Some of the conservative opponents of health care reform have suggested alternative mini-reforms on what they like to call "free-market" principles. One of those suggestions, to address the high number of twenty-somethings who forgo health insurance (due to cost), is for family insurance policies to be modified so that SINGLE children could stay on the parents' coverage to age 29. Married twenty-somethings would not get this break.

It's not just "government" that can devise alluring encouragements to the idea of un-married cohabitation. Hello, church. Are you listening?

Muser of NM @ Sep 24, 2009 10:30:19 AM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Alpha Consumer

Alpha Consumer

Kimberly Palmer, senior editor for U.S. News & World Report, writes about how to save money, avoid scams, manage debt, and be a savvy shopper. Send your personal finance questions to her for expert money advice.


advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!